Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

General News

Enlightened Backbone of Liberalism Amputated: How it Happened

By       Message Marta Steele     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 8481
Become a Fan
  (13 fans)
- Advertisement -

  

 

 Today at DC's Center for American Progress (CAP), three distinguished liberals (one actually a Social Democrat) discussed the history of liberalism and its roots. The moderator was John Halpin, a senior fellow at CAP, and the guests were author, professor, and CAP Senior Fellow Eric Alterman and Michael Kazin, a professor of social movements and politics at Georgetown University.

The occasion was the recent (April 12) publication of Alterman's latest book, The Cause: The Fight for American Liberalism from Franklin Roosevelt to Barack Obama (New York: Viking 2012), coauthored with Kevin Mattson and called by CAP "the first full-scale treatment of postwar liberalism."

A history of liberalism is most valuable for all those left of the Right wing, I'd say, because the Right wing, for all intents and purposes, can't be reached. A consistent theme throughout the stimulating discussion was that liberalism has lost its self-confidence. Too personified for my taste, but true.

After the discussion, it became clear to me, and Alterman agreed, that the ruthless surgeon/amputator was the deterioration of our public school system that can be traced back to the seventies along with the rise of plutocracy and its dumbing down of the populace to the level of irrationality that fuels the money grubbers.

The Children's Crusade was led, after all, by middle and upper-middle class college students seeking to activate the principles they were studying as part of their humanities curriculum, emphasis on which has decreased also with the rise of the plutocracy over the decades since the seventies.

The Enlightenment is the backbone of liberalism, said Alterman, that flowering of reason that fueled the American Revolution and the values it sought to perpetrate.

- Advertisement -

"Liberalism has a lot to learn," he said. The key to life is learning from the mistakes of others, he continued, quoting his good friend Warren Buffet.

Along with the Enlightenment, came the second of its three main roots, New Deal liberalism, which added the theme that beliefs must be realized, not simply idealized. The government must be on the side of individuals, championing equality of opportunity, which became an issue in this country with the advent of the industrial revolution.

The third principal root of liberalism was a product of the 1960s, cultural liberalism, which demanded civil rights for those who had never before enjoyed them. The problem with this emphasis is that it must be coupled with economic liberalism to be effective, said Alterman. And it wasn't.

Kazin's very valuable contribution at this point was to distinguish between liberalism and the Left wing. "The Left brings up issues that liberals won't face," he said. For liberals, slavery was an issue that would resolve itself through time, a problem that could be solved by deporting all blacks back to Africa. For the abolitionists, who ultimately triumphed, there was no compromise. The slaves had to be freed, and they were.

In the late nineteenth century, the labor unions that arose to protect and sponsor workers' rights were led by radicals and considered radical, even by liberals, who hated strikes, which were frequent at that time.

- Advertisement -

To accomplish what needs to be done, said Kazin, the Left must ally themselves with the liberal elite. Added Halpin, the Left feels freer to criticize government than do liberals.

Liberals and the Left are nearly symbiotic, said Alterman. Liberals, including the Kennedys and LBJ, were late to champion civil rights in the sixties and had to be prodded, but to get the job done, LBJ was as crucial as the radical MLK.

The liberals also stab themselves in the back with internal back stabbing over disagreements, losing sight of their friends, the Left wing, and in this process, their opposition to their real opponents, the right wing, is being weakened. The Right wing presents a united front against them, further diluting their strength.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

View Ratings | Rate It

Marta Steele is an author/editor/blogger who has been writing for Opednews.com since 2006. Her original website, WordsUnLtd.com, first entered the blogosphere in 2003. She recently became an editor for Opednews.com. She has in the past taught (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Heads Up! Bernie to Be Interviewed on MSNBC 9 pm Tonight with "Exciting" News

Review: Andrew Kreig, "Presidential Puppetry: Obama, Romney, and Their Masters"

Ohio Heroes On Path To Deposing Rove

Smart Security or Dumb Dollar$?

There Is Life on Mars, Not Just Water

Shall the Truth Set Us Free? (with a surprise afterword by Greg Palast)