Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
May 30, 2009 at 09:16:37

View Ratings | Rate It

Empathy (at SCOTUS)

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Freddie Venezia (about the author)     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Freddie Venezia - Writer

Empathy: The Republicans are saying Empathy is a code word for being an activist judge.

But what else might it mean?

Sonia Sotomayor has said, "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life", which some take to mean that she is racially prejudiced and shows gender preference.



But what else might it mean?

I am a white man who had one brother. Didn't I see things through the eyes of a white person? Didn't I see things through the eyes of a male?

"All men are created equal" is a foundation of our laws, but the men that wrote those words probably meant "All Free Wealthy White Men (males) are Created Equal", so that's how today's Supreme Court rules because many of them believe in interpreting the laws as they were intended. Of course when one of the litigants is a corporation, then (pardon the pseudo plagiarism from "Animal Farm"), "All Men are Created Equal, but corporations are more Equal".

I see things differently than my wife. I see things differently than an immigrant born in a communist country. I see things differently than just about anyone who does not have my same life experiences. Is it ok for Justice Scalia to see things through the eyes of a middle-aged white Roman Catholic Italian-American? What other choice does he have?

Is it wrong for seven members of the present Supreme Court to see things through the eyes of white males? Do those seven men all agree on every case? Do those seven men each think that they are applying the law as they should? Maybe the problem that the Republicans see is that they feel that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were written by Free Wealthy White Males and the vast majority of our laws were written by Wealthy White Males, and that is how it should be and how it should remain, but I don't think so. I have no Empathy for that mode of thinking, but I do have Empathy for the Empathy that Barack Obama and Sonia Sotomayor are thinking about.

Let's look at some hypothetical cases:

A man walks into an elevator occupied by a woman. He tells her to press the button that goes to the roof and that he is going to have intercourse with her. He tells her she will like it. When they get to the roof of the 10 story building, she asks him to wear a condom. He says he is not worried about babies, but she explains that it will protect him from a DNA match. They have intercourse and she doesn't fight him or talk to him as she was instructed.

He leaves her on the roof and says don't come down for 10 minutes. When he gets to the bottom floor, he hits every button on the elevator, so that it will take as much time as possible to return to the roof. After the woman gets down, she calls the police, and claims that she was raped. At the hospital, the rape exam shows no semen, no bruising of the thighs, no vaginal tearing (thanks to the spermicidal lubricant on the condom) and the medical practitioner is doubtful of any rape having taken place.

When the man is captured by the police, he claims the sex was consensual. He says that she never said "no" and even supplied a condom.

The man is found guilty and the case winds up in the Supreme Court.

Might the eyes of Ruth Bader Ginsberg see things differently that those of Chief Justice Roberts?

Is it pertinent that the defendant was a 6 foot 7 inch, 305 pound Black football player and the alleged victim was a 5 foot 2, 106 pound white woman who is the co-captain of a university debating team?

Next Page  1  |  2

 

I was born in Brooklyn, NY in 1945, worked as aircraft mechanic for 35 years and moved to Florida from Brooklyn in 2003. My wife and I will celebrate our 42nd wedding anniversary this year. Our only son is 41, married and has one daughter, plus his (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Court Decision"
The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions

$35.00
Lowest New Price $20.74

Number of pages: 528
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA

Supreme Court Decisions and Women's Rights
by Cushman C

$39.00
Lowest New Price $99.52

Number of pages: 320
Publisher: CQ Press

Supreme Court Decisions
by Jeffrey D. Stocks

$19.95
Lowest New Price $12.48

Number of pages: 112
Publisher: Prufrock Press

Irreparable Harm: The U.S. Supreme Court and The Decision That Made George W. Bush President
by Renata Adler

$8.95
Lowest New Price $5.10

Number of pages: 64
Publisher: Melville House

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Seeing others as we see ourselves by Margaret Bassett on Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 9:35:28 AM
Thanks Freddie for reminding us what empathy really means by E. Nelson on Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 11:39:52 AM
Empathy? by shadow dancer on Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 8:17:14 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum