Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (15 comments)

Electrical Engineer Disproves Einsteins Relativity Theory: The Ruins Of 106 Years Relativity

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Last week the newspapers were filled with the discovery of "impossible" particles traveling faster than the speed of light. A month ago an "impossible" star was discovered and earlier the Pioneer space probes also refused to adhere to the law. This way, the scientific establishment will slowly but surely be forced to return to reality, the reality of the existence of a real, physical ether with fluid-like properties. The inevitable result of that will be that Einstein's relativity theory will go down in the history books as one of the biggest fallacies ever brought forth by science. In the future they will look back to relativity with equal disbelief as to the "Earth is flat" concept. The relativity theory not only goes against common sense, as Tesla already said in 1932, a fundamental thinking error has been made by Maxwell in his equations. This eventually lead to the erroneous relativity theory, as is proven in this article. It is therefore no exaggeration to state that the scientific establishment is going to have a religious experience.

The scientific establishment has been completely beside the mark by worshiping Albert Einstein and forgetting about Nikola Tesla. This logically thinking realist already wiped the floor with the theory of relativity in 1932 and thus proved for the umpteenth time to be far ahead of his time:

 "It might be inferred that I am alluding to the curvature of space supposed to exist according to the teachings of relativity, but nothing could be further from my mind. I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved, is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view."

Isn't it just beautiful how Tesla makes perfectly clear that the Emperor of modern physics has no clothes with simple logic?

Read more: click here

 

http://www.tuks.nl/

MSc. in Electrical Engineering; Programmer (C++, Linux, etc.); Alternative Energy ( http://bit.ly/a2XL1u ); Ossenhoorblazer ( http://www.ossenhoorn.nl/ )

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

security concerns by Ned Lud on Monday, Oct 31, 2011 at 7:07:58 AM
I'm in the top right: by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:17:34 PM
In pursuit of constancy they made Einstein a reluctant God by Paul Repstock on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:57:05 AM
likes and dislikes by Ned Lud on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 9:35:55 AM
Satan believers by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:30:34 PM
Logic? by Maxwell on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:21:23 PM
p.s. by Maxwell on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:23:30 PM
p.p.s. by Maxwell on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:30:30 PM
Tesla tranmitter by Arend Lammertink on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:13:32 PM
Re: Logic? by Arend Lammertink on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:42:32 PM
Not sure what this proves: by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:28:54 PM
Relativity not part of the design of nuclear weapons by Arend Lammertink on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:42:05 AM
Love this topic by Peter Duveen on Wednesday, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:55:20 AM
Einstein's wife: by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:59:18 PM
And Einstein's Legacy? by Bill Johnson on Wednesday, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:39:24 AM