Tags for This Article:

Obama-Barack (4510)  McCain-John (3902)  2008 Elections (2414)  2008 Election Presidential (1305)  Foreign Policy Failure Iraq (814)  Foreign Policy Failure Afghanistan (171)  Foreign Policy Failure Pakistan (58)  Bank Failure (55)  Fed Oversight Failure (17) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
September 11, 2008 at 16:37:10

Headlined on 9/11/08:
Election 2008: Hope vs. Fear. Unity vs. Division. Success vs. Failure.

by Douglas Drenkow     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

The Historic Election of 2008

"In the future days which we seek to make secure, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms.
"The first is freedom of speech and expression. ...
"The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way. ...
"The third is freedom from want. ...
"The fourth is freedom from fear."

Those Four Freedoms were enshrined in the State of the Union speech by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in January 1941, just months before Pearl Harbor, the most devastating attack on America to that date. Today, seven years after another horrific shock to our collective system, we are embroiled in an election that the entire world recognizes is of truly historic proportions -- and not just because of the amount of pigment in one candidate's skin, or even the centuries of slavery and discrimination with which his race has been burdened. Simply put, the election of 2008 is no less than an epic contest between hope and fear: hope that can set us free, and fear that can be -- and is -- exploited to keep us divided and conquered, by powers-that-be both foreign and domestic.

Government, Though Imperfect,
Is Not the Enemy. It Is Us!

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
-- Preamble to the U.S. Constitution

Surely unrecognizable to Abraham Lincoln -- who gave his all to preserve the federal government of the United States -- the Republican Party today has as its bottom line the mantra that government is part of the problem, not part of the solution. But government, of course, even as imperfect as it is, is the one and only body constituted for we citizens to secure our liberties, as by reigning in those who would -- intentionally or inadvertently -- oppress us.

That truth has come down through history to our challenging modern times, when corporations exert more control over the lives of ordinary individuals than any government ever did at the time of our revolution. There is nothing inherently evil about a corporation; it is, of course, a truly remarkable creation for turning a profit. But by the same token, there is nothing inherently benevolent about a corporation; it exists in law for the enrichment of its shareholders, not necessarily the benefit of society at large. It is, thus, a legitimate and vital role of government to regulate the commerce of corporations, so that the rights of all are protected.

Indeed, even the security of corporations themselves is enhanced by prudent government action. The severe financial crisis we are experiencing today is a direct result of the deregulation -- not the regulation -- of business in recent years. New Deal reforms saved the banking system -- and thus American capitalism itself -- during the Great Depression; it will take likewise wise and far-reaching action by our government to quell the current crisis and restore confidence in our historically debt-ridden public and private sectors.

For the GOP to continually attack government as the enemy is tantamount to attacking whatever we as a people can and must do together in order to survive and thrive, as it has necessarily been since the dawn of civilization.

"[T]hat the strong may not oppress the weak."
-- From The Code of Hammurabi

Obama: Uniting Our States

"A house divided against itself cannot stand."
-- Abraham Lincoln, Paraphrasing Jesus Christ

This year, as four years ago, the electoral map of the United States is eerily reminiscent of the Free State / Slave State map of the Civil War. Moreover, that pattern of Blue States and Red States is repeated throughout the country as "blue counties" and "red counties" -- the former more urban, the latter more rural, the swing votes mainly in the suburban and exurban regions.

That divide seems at times to be as unbreachable as it is untenable: No nation can long survive as a nation if its people are permanently balkanized along lines of race, creed, religion, or any other difference. Looking at it another way -- and that is how a democracy is supposed to function, isn't it? -- it is easy to tell a nation's enemies from its allies: Your foes want to divide you; your friends want to unite you.

"[T]he end of the U.S. as united states"
-- The Stated Goal of Usama bin Laden

"We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."
-- Benjamin Franklin

 1  |  2

 

http://www.douglasdrenkow.com

Doug Drenkow is a writer, editor, webmaster, and producer. A fourth-generation Democrat, Doug has produced the political talk shows "Barry Gordon From Left Field," on radio, and "NewsRap with Barry Gordon," on cable TV, featuring top progressive guests in the nation. Having met his wife through the Internet, Doug is a big believer in the power of new media!

Doug Drenkow's progressive political commentaries have appeared in print, on radio and TV, and online -- as in OpEdNews, DailyKos, BuzzFlash, UPI, and BBC News Worldwide.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

Richard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.
Richard MynickRichard Mynick is a US citizen who, despite the best efforts of the corporate media, noticed something disturbing about how the 2000 election was decided, & felt it augured poorly for democracy.

What you call Obama's "inspiring call for unity and hope" is

really a dangerous subterfuge. It's partly pure campaign fluff, designed to appeal to voters who are impressed by pretty-sounding hot air.

But even worse, it's a way of steering public consciousness away from the outrages that the US ruling elite has perpetrated against the rest of the population. It's a way of saying, "It doesn't matter how many terrible crimes the Wall St oligarchy has committed. It doesn't matter that they've gamed the system, in order to rob the population blind. Let's just forget all that! We'll pretend it never happened, & we'll go on living together in 'harmony' -- where the oligarchs continue to rob you all blind -- but we'll all smile about it, feeling good about each other because we're all Americans!"

With the complicity of the Democrats, the Bush administration has committed great crimes against the Constitution & the US population. Obama's fatuous happy talk about "unity" amounts to a relatively clever & pleasant way of urging the population to forget about all this & get over it, because no one in power, of either party, has the slightest intention of doing anything about it. In fact, they intend to continue all the crimes, in a largely unchanged manner. But Obama is suggesting that it would be better if we all smiled happily about this situation. (This is part of the reason why many rightwingers, like David Brooks of the NYT, & many poohbahs on Wall St, like Obama so much.)

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 3 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1212 comments) on Friday, September 12, 2008 at 11:32:41 AM
 


organic vegetable farmer
Jim Eldonorganic vegetable farmer

this is no "epic contest"

It may be a contest, but "epic" in appearance only, just as Richard indicates above.  Hollywood works for the status quo.

The real contest is between the status quo and its opposition.  But since the opposition has no unity, whether in political party, individual representative or singular message, the prognosis is not good.  We also have woefully inadequate media access to generate that unity.  How do we oppose a government/mass-media collaboration that treats protests as "terrorism", dissenters as "enemy combatants" and third party candidates as irrelevant egocentric "spoilers"?

by Jim Eldon (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 132 comments) on Friday, September 12, 2008 at 12:51:49 PM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Keith Olbermann Broke Up With Me! by Shannyn Moore

Children dying in Haiti, victims of food crisis exacerbated by four devastating tropical storms Posted by Stephen Fox

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Crops Threaten Human Fertility and Health Safety Posted by sadelaine

Surviving an Economic Crash: Resources and Tips by Kathryn Smith

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

A Turkey By Any Other Name--Is Still the Governor of Alaska by Brasch

Home Depot Founder: Retailers Who Don't Support GOP "Should Be Shot" Posted by Joan Brunwasser

Congress Opposes Bush Pardons by David Swanson

Fate of Lakotahs Highlights America's Failed Native American Policies by Stephen Lendman

Senate testimony by police captain reveals 9 sticks of missing dynamite in 'Omaha Two' bombing case by Michael Richardson

Go To Top 50 Most Popular