Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   14 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Edward Snowden, A Modern Paul Revere

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 6/24/13

Source: Antiwar

"The authoritarians are coming! Indeed, they are already here"

Edward Snowden's hegira -- from the beaches of Hawaii to the teeming metropolis of Hong Kong, and then on to Russia and ultimately Ecuador (as of this writing) -- dramatizes the decline and fall of the American republic in ways historians will look back on as emblematic of our era. As a lone individual makes fools out of bumbling US government officials, outmaneuvering them at every turn, defenders of the regime -- let's call them Regimists -- are frantic. 

While Glenn Greenwald and the Guardian newspaper are pulling back the curtain on the Surveillance State, the Regimists are rallying around some very revealing talking points, one of which is that the countries Snowden has sought refuge in are hardly bastions of civil liberties. Hong Kong, an autonomous region of Not-so-Red China, Russia (every good neocon and neoliberal knows Putin = Stalin), and now -- eeek! -- Ecuador, which is being cast as another Venezuela. In response to these developments, Ken Roth, head of "Human Rights Watch," tweeted:
"Snowden's #Ecuador is limiting asylum rights and criminalizing journalists who harm security."

No sooner had Snowden's plane touched down on Russian soil then Roth retweeted this pearl of wisdom from one of his "human rights" buddies:

"Edward Snowden, martyr for online freedom and privacy, now passing thru Moscow? Say hi to Alexei Navalny while you're there."

As one Twitter wit quipped:

"Seems @KenRoth is following Snowden around the world, blasting HR in every country his plane is landing."

Your check is in the mail, Ken.

I hope that check isn't over two figures, however, since this particular talking point only underscores the arguments Snowden, and civil libertarians in the US, have been making: that the creation of a secret police state apparatus represents a fork in the road for the United States. Snowden said his motive was to make it possible for the American people to decide whether the Surveillance State is what they want -- and that they couldn't do this unless they knew what was going on behind their backs.

Aside from the absurdity of criticizing someone who is merely passing through a country that isn't exactly a libertarian utopia, fleeing a threat to his freedom and possibly his life, the fact of the matter is that there aren't any free countries left in the world -- not with the US falling rapidly (and secretly) into authoritarianism.

It is a "soft" version, to be sure, at least for the moment. But the baring of authoritarian teeth was visible this [Sunday] morning, when the journalist who broke the Snowden story, Glenn Greenwald, appeared on "Meet the Press." Host David Gregory assumed the tone of a Justice Department prosecutor when he sternly asked:

"To the extent that you have aided and abetted Edward Snowden, even in his current movements, why shouldn't you, Mr. Greenwald, be charged with a crime?"

To this onscreen transformation of a supposed "journalist" into the Grand Inquisitor, Greenwald responded:

"I think it's pretty extraordinary that anybody who would call themselves a journalist would publicly muse about whether or not other journalists should be charged with felonies."

Well, yes, it is extraordinary, but I think we should all be getting used to it pretty soon. And it's not like there's no precedent: I recall the Weekly Standard demanding the prosecution of the New York Times for revealing the Bush administration's hand in pioneering the eavesdropping system the Obamaites have perfected, with other conservative "journalists" joining the chorus. But this used to be the kind of thing only neocons would say out loud -- now the "liberals" have appropriated the neocons' rhetorical style as well as their intelligence-gathering methods.

It was clear what Gregory was doing: letting the journalistic mask slip for a moment, and assuming his real role as the Voice of the Powers That Be, he was issuing a direct threat on behalf of his government sources -- We're gonna get you, punk!

I wouldn't be at all surprised if they tried: Gregory, with his sources in officialdom, may have been alerted to the possibility. As Glenn pointed out, the Obama administration has proffered the "legal" theory that a Fox News journalist who worked with a source inside the government is a "co-conspirator" and therefore a felon: even David Axelrod, the President's own chief political advisor, confessed he found this "disturbing."

Let's be clear about what the stakes are in this fight: the US government has been busy setting up a comprehensive database that contains vital information on everyone in the country: they can call up your phone calls, your online activities, your movements -- anything and everything about you.

Oh, but we aren't looking at any of this "content," they cry: it's just "meta-data" we're collecting. Anyone who believes that vast treasure trove of potentially incriminating information isn't going to be used to the political advantage of whatever faction has access to it at the moment is living in a world of illusion. This is the kind of thing the old KGB would've loved to get their hands on: the idea of tracking the "social networks" that might sow the seeds of subversion is an authoritarian's dream come true. The belief that this could never happen here is what the myth of "American exceptionalism" is all about: we are somehow inherently inoculated against the toxic totalitarianism that poisons civil society in much of the rest of the world. History, however, refutes that conceit.

As McClatchy News reports, the Obama administration -- already surpassing all previous administrations combined in their relentless prosecution of whistle-blowers -- is cracking down hard within the government to make information of all kinds unavailable to the public, including the press. Tyranny percolates best in the dark, especially when the transition from a constitutional republic to democratic despotism is still in process. And we are right at that conjuncture when it's still possible to stop it -- which is why we're getting a virtually united bipartisan Establishment pushing back hard against Snowden, Greenwald, and those who support them.

They have revoked Snowden's passport -- a typically totalitarian tactic against political dissidents, long practiced by the Soviet Union and the US during the cold war era -- and my guess is that they will stop at nothing to discredit him, using methods straight out of the old KGB playbook. Consider what Snowden has told us about the ability of NSA "analysts" to penetrate the lives of anyone they choose to target, "even the President if I had a personal email." Snowden is no exception to this rule: they have a dossier on him, you can be sure, and there is nothing preventing them from handing out the juicy details (if there are any) to their favored "journalists."

In readying the population for quasi-authoritarian rule, our rulers have constructed an elaborate technological and "legal" machinery that implements and rationalizes what is in effect a "legal" coup d'etat. Snowden, however, has upended their plans by impeding the most vitally important element of the coup: getting Americans to go along with the program. The Bush administration thought they could do it by stealth and fear, and the Obamaites are pursuing that path with even greater determination than Dick Cheney ever showed. Just as they were on the brink of achieving their goal, however, one man -- a modern day Paul Revere -- sounded the alarm and wakened the American people to the danger they face.

In doing so, Snowden has made himself into a sacrificial offering on the altar of the Leviathan, bearing the entire burden on his own shoulders and suffering so that we might be free. Was there ever a nobler act performed in defense of our old republic? If so, I haven't heard of it.

Next Page  1  |  2

Justin Raimondo is the editorial director of He is the author of An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard (Prometheus Books, 2000), Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement (ISI, 2008), (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Assange's Last Stand?

The FBI vs.

The Hollow Empire

The Israel Lobby and the Road to War

The Sony Hack Fraud

Is America a Force for Good in the World?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Whatever Edward Snowden is, and wherever Edward Sn... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:25:54 AM
I disagree with your premise that Snowden is selli... by Wil Masisak on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:31:03 PM
with sundry cults of personality, especially those... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:55:42 PM
Freedom of thought, John. Ideas that support free... by Wil Masisak on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:51:34 PM
Why would any country pay him for what he' giving ... by David Weaver on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:45:51 PM
and to my knowledge has not offered to do so. He h... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:37:17 PM
Didn't Snowden say he wouldn't reveal anything tha... by Kristine Hoggatt on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:07:27 PM
Why didn't I think of that. Snowden must just be h... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:16:11 PM
Don't debunk Snowden as decent and courageous man ... by Guglielmo Tell on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:24:53 PM
What I said was that the United States must assume... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:21:30 PM
I exect your answer to be truthful if I own your A... by Wil Masisak on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:53:13 PM
Very well said!... by Nancy S on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:44:49 PM
that the NSA might not be able to isolate all of t... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:09:35 PM
Snowden, Manning... by Alan MacDonald on Monday, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:11:39 PM