Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

EVOLUTION OF THE UFO - we don't need no steenking aliens

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

EVOLUTION OF THE UFO - we don't need no steenking aliens
by Harry Mobley                      
                      
At one point I believed that UFOs came from some distant planet, but, after much research, I've come to the determination that they are actually human made.

The following is their development timeline as far as I can tell.  I welcome additional information and comments.

 This is an open post, and will be modified as needed.                                         
________________________________

TIMELINE
1923
Thomas Townsend Brown, becomes a physics student of Dr. Paul Biefield at the California Institute for Advanced Studies (later renamed Cal Tech). He discovered that if you apply high voltages of direct current to two metal plates separated by a dielectric, it would reduce their weight by a small percentage. The higher the voltage, the lighter it became, until it became weightless and could even lift a small payload.

1928
Electro-Gravitic propulsion (what UFOs use to fly) is patented by T. Townsend Brown - who had expanded work done by Nikola Tesla. This is called " The Biefield Brown Effect " or " Ion Wind ".

Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBBlZ8agldE

more on Tesla and T.Townsend Brown antigravity:
http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/2010/11/nikola-teslas-flying-saucer.html
http://www.ttbrown.com/
http://www.electrogravityphysics.com/html/t_brown.html
http://members.gcronline.com/cbrauda/

1938
T.Townsend Brown submits proposal to the Pentagon for the development of a Mach 3 disc shaped electro-gravitic fighter craft.  It is called 'PROJECT WINTERHAVEN'. This is a copy of that document:
http://www.americanantigravity.com/documents/military-research/Project-Winterhaven.pdf


The proposal is not accepted.

1938-1945
Germany decides to develop Brown's antigravity discs for it's Luftwaffe. Hitler can't admit that it is American technology so he claims that they had learned to harness 'Vril' - which he says is 'the mysterious energy of the Black Sun'.  In reality, the 'Black Sun' is only occultspeak for the solar eclipse.

The Nazi's first attempt was called the 'RFZ', after which came several models of 'VRIL' saucers, followed by seven models which were named 'HAUNEBU' - the latest having machine guns mounted on top and a Panzer style tank turret on the bottom.

Here are some images:

1944
Germany designs a 360 foot long cigar shaped 'mothership' to be a mobile lauch platform for the smaller discs. They call it the 'ANDROMEDA'.

At this same time, they are sending expeditions to Antarctica to attempt to set up an air base to attack the United States from the South Pole. This area they called 'NEUSCHWABENLAND'.

1946
Under 'OPERATION PAPERCLIP', over 760 captured top Nazi scientists and physicists who created these discs, and from other fields such as rocketry and mind control are brought to Fort Bliss, at El Paso, Texas; and White Sands Proving Grounds near Alamogordo, New Mexico.

1947
A UFO disc crashes near Roswell, New Mexico. I believe it was a test flight of a NAZI craft.
http://www.roswellufocrash.com/

1948
Another disc shaped craft crashes near Aztec, New Mexico.....or does it?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=UFO+crash+aztec+New+mexico&btnG=Google+Search

1951
Lubbock Texas - by this time our pilots are becoming adept enough to fly groups of Haunebu in standard 'V' formation. This became known as the 'LUBBOCK LIGHTS'. Sightings went on for about two months. Lubbock is just East of Alamogordo and White Sands.
1952
Rene' Couzinet shows off his new French 'aerodyne' which he calls 'RC360'

1958-1961
A Canadian company, A.V. Roe contracts with the U.S. military to produce disc shaped aircraft under PROJECT SILVERBUG.


They name the disc AVROCAR.
Take a look at the picture at the top of this page. Beautiful, isn't it?

 
This is what that same disc, the AV-7055 , looks like today...50 years later:


1950s and 60s
NASA uses the PEPP AEROSHELL - which was balloon launched from Roswell, New Mexico to test parachutes for the Voyager Mars lander program.  Oops!



1960
British Airships develops the 'SKYSHIP',  which it hoped to use for passenger use.


1962-
Since 1962 MOLLER INTERNATIONAL has produced several types of VTOL craft, from disc shaped to the 'SKYCAR', which looks more like a Formula 1 race car.


 1960s-
John Searl tests his 'SEARL DISC' which uses his 'Searl effect'.

1964
Astro Kinetics Corporation of Houson, Texas introduces it's ' DYNAFAN ' VTOL disc.

1967
At Wright Patterson AFB, four different sizes of disc shaped aircraft were sighted. I originally downloaded this pdf file from a site called 'USAF UFOS' in about 2003, and within a couple of days the site disappeared.

As far as I can find, this is the only place it still exists in it's entirety:

A few more photos from this file can be seen here about halfway down the page:
_________________________________________
Here are some listings from the U.S. patent office:

Patented July 30, 1957: Constantin Lent, Saucer-shaped Aircraft, Pat.# 2,801, 058
Patented Mar. 11, 1960: John Sherwood, Vertical Lift Flying Machine, Pat.# 213, 529
Patented Dec. 11, 1962: Irwin Barr, Rotating Flying Machine, Pat.# 3, 067, 967
Patented June 7, 1960: Heinrich Fleißner, Rotating Jet Aircraft with Lifting Disc, Pat.# 2, 939, 648 
Patented Nov. 27, 1956: John C. Fischer Jr., Rotating Circular Aircraft , Pat.# 2, 772, 057
Patented March 10, 1959: Homer F. Streib, Circular Wing Aircraft with Tiltable Ducted Power Plant, Capable of Vertical and lateral Flight, Pat.# 2, 876, 965
Patented Sept. 10, 1963: Nathan C. Price, High Velocity High Altitude VTOL Aircraft, Pat.# 3, 103, 324
Patented March 10, 1964: JCM Frost, Circular Aircraft Populsion and Control, Pat.# 3, 124, 323
Patented Jan. 26, 1965: Donald Eral Ordway, Circular Aircraft, Pat.#  Des. 200, 183 200, 183
Patented May 1, 1956: Leonor Zalles, Circular Aircraft, Pat.# Des. Des. 177, 564 177, 564
Patented Feb. 24, 1976: Paul S. Moller, Dixos, Calif. assignor to Discojet Corporation, Davis Calif., Flying Saucer Aircraft, Pat.# Des.  238, 938 usw. 238, 938, etc.

___________________________
2000-
There are several reports of Lockheed making a two man anti-gravity fighter disc which was supposedly tested during Desert Storm in Iraq and called 'X-22A DARK STAR'. However, I haven't found any reliable sources to confirm that this craft exists.


2001-
Russian aviation company, 'EKIP' creates a saucer shaped ship. It has both passenger and cargo models
_______

More recently, UFO sightings have mostly changed from disc shaped craft to triangle shaped.
These are reportedly built by Northrop Grumman, and they are the  'TR-3A BLACK MANTA' , [2] and the 'TR-3B ASTRA LOCUST'.

Several years ago, when I first heard of the TR3A, I was searching every possible place I could think of for pictures of it.

Even though the US government denies that this craft exists, the Czech army is well aware of it, and sees it as a very real threat.

I caught this drawing off their '.mil' web site:

 Why are the militaries from other countries familiar with these craft, when the American citizens who pay for them aren't allowed to know - and in fact, are lied to about their existence?

This picture I found on a site from Belgium.

A couple of years ago, I found a TR3B flight simulator program and did some test flying of the TR3B, but now, as you know if you clicked that last link, all links to that program download are dead.


This will give you an idea of what it was like:


Now begs the question:
Since there is ample evidence that  several countries around the globe have been flying these 'UFOs' for roughly 75 years, why are they still TOP SECRET ?

The answer to that is ' PROJECT BLUEBEAM ' - the last ditch effort to install the New World Order global government if all else fails... utilizing the time proven method called 'THE HEGELIAN DIALECTIC' .

Listen to what Ronald Reagan had to say about this when he was president:
( don't stop it after the first United Nations speech insert.. it will continue with several more clips)

'The Report From Iron Mountain" in 1963 was the top secret findings of a study to find if peace was possible in a modern world... and if it was possible, was it desirable?

They decided that if we were to live without war, we'd need some 'alternatives to war' for social cohesiveness, economics and job creation, population level maintenance/reduction,  political control, and other factors...

In SECTION 6: Substitutes for the Functions of War , under 'Political', we find:
"Credibility, in fact, lies at the heart of the problem of developing a political substitute for war. This is where the space-race proposals, in many ways so well suited as economic substitutes for war, fall short. The most ambitious and unrealistic space project cannot of itself generate a believable external menace. It has been hotly argued that such a menace would offer the "last, best hope of peace," etc., by uniting mankind against the danger of destruction by "creatures" from other planets or from outer space.
Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-our-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain "flying saucer" incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind. If so, they could hardly have been judged encouraging.
We anticipate no difficulties in making a "need" for a giant super space program credible for economic purposes, even were there not ample precedent; extending it, for political purposes, to include features unfortunately associated with science fiction would obviously be a more dubious undertaking.


Nevertheless, an effective political substitute for war would require "alternate enemies," some of which might seem equally farfetched in the context of the current war system.
However unlikely some of the possible alternate enemies we have mentioned may seem, we must emphasize that one must be found, of credible quality and magnitude, if a transition to peace is ever to come about without social disintegration. It is more probable, in our judgment, that such a threat will have to be invented, rather than developed from unknown conditions."
Later, in "Sociological"


"When it comes to postulating a credible substitute for war capable of directing human behavior patterns in behalf of social organization, few options suggest themselves. Like its political function, the motivational function of war requires the existence of a genuinely menacing social enemy. The principal difference is that for purposes of motivating basic allegiance, as distinct from accepting political authority, the "alternate enemy" must imply a more immediate, tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction. It must justify the need for taking and paying a "blood price" in wide areas of human concern."

And then, in "Substitutes for the Functions of War: Models"....

Next Page  1  |  2

 

No, his mind is not for rent To any god or government. Always hopeful, yet discontent, He knows changes aren't permanent, But change is. _________________________ diagonally parked in a parallel universe
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

EVOLUTION OF THE UFO - we don't need no steenking aliens


Strict Standards: Non-static method DomAnalyze::removeStyles() should not be called statically in /home/opednews/public_html/populum/classes/DomAnalyze.inc.php on line 163

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

In all its meticulously researched, impressive, co... by Dante DeNavarre on Sunday, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:38:04 PM