Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News

Don Siegelman and the Bush Double Standard

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 6/8/08

Don Siegelman, former Democratic governor of Alabama, is out of federal prison while he fights his conviction on corruption-related charges. At the heart of the Siegelman case was a charge that he received a campaign contribution from a supporter and then took actions that benefited that supporter.

As Siegelman's case works its way through the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, it is becoming more and more clear that a contribution of this sort does not constitute federal-funds bribery and the case never should have been prosecuted.

But here is what's most striking about the aftermath of the Siegelman case: His successor, Republican Bob Riley, took a campaign contribution from a supporter and then helped steer millions of state dollars toward that contributor--resulting in a new biotechnology center in Huntsville, Alabama. This transaction took place even though Alabama already has a vibrant biotech infrastructure at UAB and Southern Research Institute in Birmingham.

Representatives from the Huntsville biotech center recently traveled with Riley to Brazil to examine processes used there to turn sugar cane into biofuels. Evidently they plan to take knowledge picked up in Brazil and return to Alabama to make bucket fulls of cash.

Are Riley's supporters benefiting from their contribution to his campaign? Sure looks like it. Is the "deal" involving Siegelman substantially different from the "deal" involving Riley? Not that we can see. Does the Bush Justice Department, which was so eager to go after Siegelman and supporter Richard Scrushy, show any signs of going after Riley and the Huntsville biotech crowd? Not on your life.

In real life, that's called a double standard. In terms of justice, it's called selective prosecution. And that's why the U.S. House Judiciary Committee needs to keep a close eye on Alabama as it investigates the politicization of the Justice Department under George W. Bush.

 

I live in Birmingham, Alabama, and work in higher education. I became interested in justice-related issues after experiencing gross judicial corruption in Alabama state courts. This corruption has a strong political component. The corrupt judges are (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Boy Scouts and the Horrors of Their "Perversion Files"

Bush vs. Obama on Spending: It's No Contest

Why Is Karl Rove Planning to Visit the Backwoods of Alabama?

What's the Real Story Behind Karl Rove's Divorce?

Is "Morning Joe" Scarborough a Murderer?

Rove Might Be Trying To "Pull A Siegelman" With Julian Assange

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It is probably a pipe dream thinking that we will ... by Mad Jayhawk on Sunday, Jun 8, 2008 at 11:49:43 PM
I may have got it wrong but I thought that in the ... by Archie on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:46:44 PM
Anyone seriously interested in the unfathomable cr... by Linda Alvarez on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:54:11 PM