Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
2 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Doing the Benghazi Shuffle

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (14 fans)

opednews.com

Doing the Benghazi Shuffle

As informed voters know, Mitt Romney is no foreign policy guru.   His European trip this summer was a gaffe-fest which, while providing entertaining reading here at home, irritated citizens and leaders of several allied nations.   Rumor has it that Romney was stung so badly in last week's debate by his Benghazi blunder, that he is now actually checking news sources outside of the Fox bubble, cramming for this week's foreign policy debate.   Expect another round of major policy reversals.

In the Daily Republic article, Romney sees Libya from his kitchen, I wrote "Gov. Mitt Romney, either confused about the details and timeline or not caring and simply wishing to score cheap political points, blasted President Barack Obama, saying, "An apology for America's values is never the right course.' "By Wednesday, major newswires had explained the timeline clearly and as facts were compared with statements, both Republican and Democratic Party leaders condemned Romney's appalling lack of judgment."   Well, Republican strategists have successfully buried Romney's "appalling lack of judgment" under a mountain of editorials condemning President Obama for the terrorist attack in Benghazi, including one by this paper.   I asked last week: "Does it make sense for congressional Republicans to cut U.S. embassy funding by $500 million annually and then complain about inadequate security in Benghazi?"   Apparently it's "Yes," if you can convince voters the attack was Obama's fault and distract them from Romney's blunders and malarkey.  

When Republicans voted to slash $1.2 billion from State Department operations in 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that reducing the State Department budget would be "detrimental to America's national security."     Mitt blusters he will increase the Defense spending $2 trillion, but you can expect deep State Department cuts with Romney/Ryan budgets.     It is truly naïve to believe the State Department and preventing wars are not essential factors determining our security.            

Question: Should U.S. embassy deaths be used as a football, kicked around to score cheap political points?   In the Libya column, I said, "Chris Stevens, the U.S. ambassador killed by terrorists, grew up right next door to us, in Davis. You have to wonder how his family feels about this crass politicization of his death."   Well, now we know.   Chris Stevens' father said it was "abhorrent" that his son's death has been politicized.   "It does not belong in the campaign arena."    Barbara Doherty, mother of a Navy SEAL killed in the attack also asked Mitt Romney to stop mentioning her son's name while campaigning. "I don't trust Romney.   He shouldn't make my son's death part of his political agenda."

Now, l et's see where Benghazi fits into the Big Picture; here's a list of U.S. Embassy attacks under the last five presidents:    Ronald Reagan: 1983, Beirut and Kuwait.   1984, Beirut and Bogota.   1986, Jakarta.   1987, Rome.   George H.W. Bush: 1989, Bogota, Panama, Bolivia, and Santiago.   1990, Tel Aviv.   Bill Clinton: 1993, Lima.   1995, Moscow.   1998, Beirut, Kenya, Tanzania.   George W. Bush: 2002, Calcutta, Pakistan, and Indonesia.   2003, Pakistan.   2004, Uzbekistan and Saudi Arabia.   2006, Pakistan and Syria.   2007, Athens.   2008, Yemen and Serbia.   President Obama:   2010, Pakistan.   2012, Cairo and Benghazi.   Terrorists don't really care which political party is in power and obviously no previous president had the god-like, omnipotent qualities Republicans are now demanding of President Obama.   Republican strategists don't want you to dig too deep into this matter; just accept their spin at face value.   But now you know, so let's move beyond their artificial distraction and discuss Romney's bogus budget math, bipolar policy swings, the blatant lies that permeate his campaign, and real issues affecting Americans.

 

http://www.amazon.com/Vile-Acts-Evil-Banking-America/dp/1448

Mike Kirchubel writes a weekly Progressive/Economic column for the Fairfield, California Daily Republic and is the author of: Vile Acts of Evil, a look at the hidden economic history of the United States. Vile Acts of Evil almost wrote itself. (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How Benjamin Franklin Caused the Revolutionary War

The REAL "Entitlement" Programs Benefit the Rich

This Financial Mess - Causes and Cures

The Civil War and the National Debt

Let's make Election Day a national holiday

Paul Ryan: The Paris Hilton of politics

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I thought it was the Republican House that reduced... by Archie on Monday, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:28:58 PM
I used "Republicans" and "congressional Republican... by Mike Kirchubel on Tuesday, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:57:25 PM