OpEdNews Op Eds

Does the ACLU Really Support the 1st Amendment?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
- Advertisement -

Does the ACLU Really Support the 1st Amendment?
(image by Freedom Tracks Records)

Thomas Jefferson began editing the New Testament while a sitting president and, later attempted to have his revision become the official U.S. government-endorsed version, ensuring it would be read in every public schoolhouse of his day.  James Madison stated the 1st Amendment would aid in the spread of Christianity.  Benjamin Franklin openly complained the framers weren't seeking God's guidance enough while drafting the Constitution. 

Many today equate "religion" with belief in God, while it is far more likely, based on the subsequent letters of Jefferson, Adams and Madison, that in the 1st Amendment, the word "religion" refers to institutional religion.   Regardless, as Jefferson later clearly stated, what is actually true about God, religion and science has no relevance to the protection of free expression.  Whether modern science theories are accurate or poorly constructed fairy-tales is irrelevant to 1st Amendment protections.

According to legitimate polls, in the United States over 50% of scientists, 70% of physicians and 80% of educators claim to believe in God.  Even though virtually all historically prominent scientists and many living scientists believe the evidence demonstrates grand design, the ACLU refuses to protect their highly credentialed scientific conclusions.  Instead, it demands that educators deliberately lie to our children by omission, leaving out the fact many major historical and living scientists and every signer of the Declaration agree the scientific evidence demonstrates design.

Militant atheist Richard Dawkins agrees the "God question" is central to the scientific thought and inquiry of virtually every major scientist, including Charles Darwin.  Yet, many today pretend God is not a question for science.  To ignore what major scientists have publicly stated is to teach our children questioning what is true is not relevant to education. Many of those who endorse gross censorship of the known facts of history and science, are the same folks who are angry over the one-sidedness of conservative talk radio.

Modern evolutionary theory does in fact address the "God question".  Any theory claiming "randomness" or otherwise assuming the universe is a result of "natural" unguided processes, is implying to impressionable students there is no God.  Quite obviously, nobody from our extremely narrow tiny window perspective could possibly know the universe or anything contained therein is a result of unguided processes.  Why then, would we imply this to our children?

Atheism has no more protection under the 1st Amendment than Catholicism. Is freedom of speech or science itself really being served when only a non-evidenced based superstitious assumption is taught in public schools?  According to biographer Walter Isaacson, Albert Einstein said: "I have a deep feeling of faith, a deep religiosity that comes from my appreciation of the way the Lord made the universe."  Every signer of the Declaration agreed evidence for God is beyond all rational dispute.

Should we forbid Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, DaVinci, Newton, Copernicus, Galileo, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, Paine, Darwin, Einstein and leading DNA expert Francis Collins, from teaching their scientific opinions in public schools?

- Advertisement -

Does the ACLU really support the 1st Amendment?  You decide.

Links to Footnotes and More Information:



Richard Aberdeen is a Nashville, Tennessee based author and songwriter and owner of Freedom Tracks Records, a multi-genre independent record label focusing on political and social issues, where the music is always free.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Are There Homeless Veterans in America?

Can Charles Darwin be Trusted?

Is Atheism Scientific?

Does the NRA Really Support the 2nd Amendment?

Should We Boycott Walmart & Exxon/Mobile?

Is Richard Dawkins Really a Scientist?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The term "religion" means multiple things and, to ... by Richard Aberdeen on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:44:37 AM
It is perfectly legal, and always has been to tea... by George Flower on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:29:28 PM
I think you missed the point.  It is not tru... by Richard Aberdeen on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:50:18 PM
You did not understand the point of my comment, w... by George Flower on Saturday, Jan 25, 2014 at 7:49:06 PM
It is illegal for a high school teacher to state ... by Richard Aberdeen on Saturday, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:14:47 PM
If you Google "ADL creation in public science clas... by Richard Aberdeen on Saturday, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:32:10 PM