Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats

OpEdNews Op Eds

Do the rich deserve their wealth?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (10 fans)

It should have been political suicide for the GOP to threaten to block all legislation (including an extension of unemployment benefits) until Congress extends the Bush tax cuts to the wealthiest 2% of American taxpayers. Or so it seems to those Americans who see the Republicans' ultimatum as contrary to basic decency.

Some polls indicate that a majority of Americans disagreed with the GOP's stand. But this disagreement didn't rise to a level of outrage that would deter Mitch McConnell or John Boehner.

Why wasn't there more outrage? After all, what the Republicans were trying to do would worsen an already high degree of income and wealth inequality. The USA is the most unequal of all advanced industrial societies.

The statistics are striking. 44 million Americans live below the poverty line. According to a Reuters report last October, "in 2009 inequality was at the highest level since the Census began tracking household income in 1967." In 2007, the latest year for which figures are available from the Federal Reserve Board, the top 1% of U.S. households owned 33.8% of the nation's private wealth, while the bottom 90% owned only 28.5%.

This inequality undermines democratic government. An increasingly wealthy ruling class funds the political campaigns of candidates who can be counted on to look after the interests of this class. We're becoming a plutocracy.

Our ruling class can afford private education, private health care, and even private security. Their well-being is uncoupled from the welfare of the mass of citizens. They are content to starve the public sector by depriving the government of revenue it needs to fund basic social programs. Welcome to America, an "advanced" capitalist society in which large segments of the population are falling through a weak and tattered social safety net.

One reason for the lack of outrage is that many Americans at all income levels feel that the wealthy "deserve" their high incomes, and that the government has no right to redistribute this wealth to poorer, "less deserving" citizens.

What does the word "deserve" mean in this context? People receive very high incomes due to some combination of talent, hard work and luck. By definition, we don't deserve luck. Do we deserve our talents? No, we get those through a genetic lottery - once again, a matter of luck. Yes, many talents need hard work to develop. That leaves us with hard work, the third component in personal economic success.

Would a wealthy person want to argue that income should be proportioned according to effort? The working poor of this country would be glad to hear this, especially those whose work is physically demanding, and those who must work at more than one job to support families. But I doubt that such a view would be popular among the upper ten percent of taxpayers.

Any sensible person understands that there must be enough income inequality to create incentives for the more talented and energetic members of society to do their utmost. Everyone benefits from such inequality.

But how much inequality can be justified in this way? Do all citizens or classes benefit from the degree of inequality in the U.S.? When 44 million live in poverty and 17 million children live in households that are insecure in their food supply? When, according to the Economic Policy Institute, the richest 10% received nearly 2/3 of total income growth from 1979-2007, while the bottom 20% received almost nothing?

Another term for private wealth in this context is private property. What does it mean to call a car or a house "my property?" What is the difference between something being in my possession (perhaps through a criminal act) and its being my property? The difference is that society, through its government, will protect and uphold my claim to what is my property.

The problem of accelerating economic inequality can be put this way: why should the members of a democratic society uphold the claims of, let's say, the top one percent of households to 34% of the nation's private wealth? Is a plutocracy to everyone's advantage? If not, then there is no good reason for citizens to uphold such claims.


I'm a retired philosophy professor at Centre College. I also am a regular columnist for our local paper, The Danville Advocate-Messenger, as well as the Lexington Herald-Leader. My last book was Posthumanity-Thinking Philosophically about the Future (more...)
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Are humans creating a posthuman future?

The Mythology of Individualism

Walmart, Waltons epitomize America's class war

Denmark: Land of the Free

Do American workers have the Stockholm Syndrome?

The GOP response to global warming is irrational and dangerous


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Do people deserve even their capacity to exert gre... by Brian Cooney on Friday, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:00:17 AM
Success under capitalism, especially capitalism in... by John Reed on Friday, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:52:53 PM
The main rason why there is such a big proportion ... by David Chester on Saturday, Dec 25, 2010 at 2:41:15 PM
LVT sure sounds good. I'll certainly vote for it. ... by Daniel Penisten on Sunday, Dec 26, 2010 at 2:04:23 PM
The first thing to do is to read the literature on... by David Chester on Friday, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:53:23 AM
Thanks. I went into the site you offered link for.... by Daniel Penisten on Friday, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:41:51 PM