OpEdNews Op Eds

Do We Deserve Our Constitution Any Longer?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

I’d love to know who here really really cares anymore about what’s happening, because when you no longer care about something, you simply no longer deserve it.

 

Having watched C-SPAN, and having listened to callers express outrage over the recent actions of the U.S. Congress, and looking through the Diaries on the Rec List here and at other sites, any visitor to our small planet might conclude we American citizens no longer deserve our Constitution.

 

If you really do care about the U.S. Constitution, that would mean you’d be willing to do something in its defense. We all know lip service and action are two different things. So if you do care, or you think you still care, please allow me to explain some things about our Supreme Law, and what can be done to prevent it from being ignored any longer.

 

In life, we know there are two types of Opinion: objective and subjective. Objective opinion is based on what we clearly know to be true, i.e. the facts. Subjective opinion is based on what is true for us individually. As it happens, the Constitution is also divided into these two categories. The objective aspect is its seven articles, or its Structural Law. The subjective aspect is its twenty-seven amendments, or its Civil Law. You can debate all day and forever about what 28th Amendment would best serve the U.S.A. today, but there’s no debating how such an amendment is to be proposed and ratified.

 

It should be clear that the 110th U.S. Congress has failed to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. The vote on FISA is but one example in a long list (and if you think that list is at an end, I’d suggest it’s just beginning). The Constitution provides exactly two ways to propose change for the union: Congress or Convention. And if there are two ways to get something done, and one is out of commission, what do you do?

 

When we examine the convention clause of Article V, at first glance, it appears there are many unanswered questions. How is such a convention to be convoked and convened? Once convoked, what happens? Once convened, what happens?

 

Due to recent legal history, it’s been determined that it’s up to the politicians in Congress to decide whether this nation shall ever hold a federal convention. In other words--and there are current members on record stating this--as soon as there is genuine interest in utilizing this aspect of the Constitution, the Congress will act.

 

Many people fear an Article V Convention, because they are ignorant in their belief that it’s the same thing as a constitutional convention. This is incorrect. A constitutional convention is for the purpose of writing and proposing a constitution, whereas an Article V Convention is for writing and proposing amendments to our U.S. Constitution. Citizens who cannot make this critical distinction between a constituional convention and an Article V Convention are what we call stupid, i.e. lacking intelligence.

Whichever convention you’re talking about, it’s important to keep in mind that discussing and writing new law is not the same thing as ratifying new law. Ratification requires a certain amount of approval before a proposed law has any effect.

 

If you--yes you--believe that "voting" new legislators into the Congress to replace those who have failed the Constitution will make things right again, then your credibility as an American is questionable. The U.S. Congress is and has been compromised by corporate and special interests for one, and secondly, due to a hodge podge of electronic voting machines, we can no longer be sure as to the accuracy of any said "election."

 

For those who care, I suggest you put your money where your mouth is. I’d like to think there are enough apart of this community willing to co-produce a feature documentary which could and would create the interest required to coerce a convention call out of the U.S. Congress.

 

I'm a writer/artist/activist from California, with a degree in Creative Studies from the University of California at Santa Barbara. I've been an advocating for the convention clause of Article V since 2001.


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Hamlet 3:2

Hamlet 5:2

Note to Naomi Wolf

Short Playscript On Torture

Hamlet Adaptation (Act 1, Scene 3)

The First Stop Sign in America

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

http://www.articlev.orgaccording to physics, simpl... by john de herrera on Saturday, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:25:59 PM
I understand and share your frustration with the s... by JC Garrett on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:14:21 AM
While in the abstract I tend to agree with what yo... by PrMaine on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:51:16 AM
will have a chance to be considerd, will be at a f... by john de herrera on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:45:42 AM
There's no question that certain amendments co... by JC Garrett on Friday, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:00:40 AM
what exactly would happen after the call is coerce... by john de herrera on Friday, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:11:40 PM
I assure you that I don't comment on issues th... by JC Garrett on Saturday, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:02:18 AM
fail to propose credible legislation in regards to... by john de herrera on Saturday, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:28:12 AM
many of your points are fallacies. it seems you... by john de herrera on Monday, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:43:12 AM