Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

Did you know that Jonah Goldberg's and Obama's skin color are different?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

Jonah Goldberg just can't resist playing the hard-right, Republican race card, just one more time, on Obama. His latest article starts right off with the blatantly racist title, "Skin color is all that's new about Obama."- It can be said equally as accurately that skin color is all that's new about Goldberg, and I don't even know what color his skin is, and I don't care. Obama's skin color is some kind of obsessive issue with Goldberg, but he doesn't see that Obama had no more to do with his skin color than Goldberg did with his own skin color.

Did you know that McCain is a white man? During the primaries, we heard to the point of exhausted disgust that Hillary is a white woman and that Obama is a black man. I don't remember being reminded on a daily basis or it ever being mentioned that McCain is a white man. Has anyone noticed that, since we've never been told that?

Goldberg writes, "The oldest word in American politics is 'new.' Only in that sense is there anything new to Barack Obama."- Aside from that statement making absolutely no sense at all, the only thing new about Obama, which Goldberg is completely unaware of is that he is the first black man in American history to be nominated for and run a successful campaign for the presidency of the United States, the first man to change a pattern of all white presidents in over 200 years. Goldberg doesn't think that's new.

In the title, Goldberg refers to what's new about Obama. In the statement above, he refers to what's new to Obama. The one is objective, it's about Obama, the second is subjective, it's what's new to Obama. Goldberg, an accomplished writer, confuses his perspectives.

Goldberg writes, "The Bill of Rights, lamented the progressives, inhibited what the government can do to people, but it failed to delineate what it must do for people."- The Constitution doesn't inhibit, which means to restrain from what someone is trying to do. It actually forbids and makes it illegal for the government to even try to prevent us from having what the Bill of Rights guarantees as our rights.

Actually, the Constitution does delineate what it must do for the people. In the very first sentence, the Preamble, the law of the land is spelled out that the government is to "promote the general welfare."- Goldberg associates Obama's "spreading the wealth around"- with socialism or radicalism. Well, spreading the wealth around is promoting the general welfare. That's according to the requirement set forth in the Constitution.

Goldberg got both of those wrong.

Goldberg writes, "Wilson, Roosevelt and now Obama - all their ideas sprung forth from the work of John Dewey, the most important liberal philosopher of the 20th century."- It is impossible for Goldberg to justify using the superlatives "all"- and "most important"- in describing where Obama got his ideas. It's just possible that Obama had an idea of his own. Apparently Obama being a black man, as Goldberg is so constantly aware of, prevents Obama from having any ideas of his own. Not even one tiny, little, original idea. The all inclusive "all"- of his ideas must come from someone else. And, there are philosophers of the 20th century, as or even more, important than John Dewey.

- Advertisement -

Goldberg got both of those wrong, too.

Goldberg quotes Obama, "Because first we have to take back the White House, we have to take back the Senate, and we have to take back the House."-

Goldberg then writes in mind-numbing defiance of the obvious, "Note: If Obama wins next week, all three of his preconditions will have been met."- Goldberg is unaware that Obama is only running for the presidency, that if he wins, he will only be able to take back the White House, that other people besides Obama must win in order to take back the Senate and the House. They are all three separate political entities and separate physical locations. Obama can't occupy all three if he wins, as Goldberg seems to think.

Goldberg got that one wrong, too.

Goldberg gets paid good money to write this crap, full of semantic errors, factual errors, errors in the use of superlatives, and a failure to understand how the three branches of government are filled by more people than just the president.

- Advertisement -

Reading the articles written by the volunteer writers here at OEN, it seems that it's left up to the people who gladly volunteer and gladly accept getting paid nothing who are the most committed to providing the most accurate commentary and also providing the corrections necessary to keep the well paid writers, such as Jonah Goldberg, from getting away with their awful drivel.

And, yes, "most committed"- and "most accurate"- are superlatives, used appropriately, in stark contrast to the writing of Jonah Goldberg.

 

Ed Martin is an ordinary person who is recovering from being badly over-educated. Born in the middle of the Great Depression, he is not affiliated with nor a member of any political, social or religious organization. He is especially interested in (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Conyers' year of tolerating contempt

You need to read this! Rob Kall's declaration of war

Removal of the President from Office

Textbook descriptions of George Bush reveal psychopathy, and much worse.

The worst is yet to come; foreclosure fraud is the banksters' least problem

The twelve powers of a President.

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I'm not sure people like Goldberg even really ... by virginius "gin" arnold on Thursday, Oct 30, 2008 at 8:54:53 AM