Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Dick Durbin: Don't rule out cuts to Social Security

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Valuable 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 4/19/11

opednews.com

Joan McCarter for Daily Kos

Sen. Dick Durbin (John Gress/Reuters)

Following up on fellow "Gang of Six" member Sen. Mark Warner's disturbing remarks about Social Security, Sen. Dick Durbin today comes right out with it: Social Security cuts are on the table in budget negotiations.

He further says that Obama's plan as outlined in his speech last Wednesday is "the other side of the spectrum" from Rep. Paul Ryan's plan, and should be considered the left side of the debate. While being left of Ryan, the Obama plan is by no means the "other side of the spectrum." It's been correctly called "center right" by Paul Krugman, and "a rather conservative one, significantly to the right of the Rivlin-Domenici plan" by the Center on Budget and Policy Priority's Bob Greenstein. This isn't going to be good.

"You have the House Republican budget from Congressman Paul Ryan, who I know and like, which is going to be placed somewhere on the right side of the spectrum. You have the president's suggestion, which will be on the other side of the spectrum. And if and when we reach an agreement, it will be in the middle, a bipartisan effort, which I think has a chance to succeed," Durbin said in an interview for ABC News' "Subway Series."

He gets a good kick in at Sen. Bernie Sanders, who has legislation -- cosponsored by Majority Leader Harry Reid -- to keep Social Security out of the budget negotiations. It's a "sense of the Senate"-type resolution, a marker put down politically, but not actually binding on the body or with the force of the rule of law. Nonetheless, Durbin says, "I think Bernie is going too far with his language."

Specifically on Social Security:

"In 2037, as we know it, Social Security falls off a cliff," he said. "There's a 22-percent reduction rate in payments, which is really not something we can tolerate. If we deal with it today, it's an easier solution than waiting. I think we ought to deal with it. Many of my colleagues disagree, put it off to another day. But from my point of view, leaving it out makes it easier politically, including it, I think, meets an obligation, which we have to senior citizens."

One specific change Durbin said should be considered right now is reducing Social Security benefits to the wealthy.

Durbin is simply not telling the truth there. Social Security does not "fall off a cliff" in 2037. With no intervention, it could pay out 75% of benefits beginning in 2037. Not ideal, but not off a cliff, either. The means testing he's considering "right now" wouldn't actually save the program much at all. There actually aren't that many wealthy seniors, maybe two percent of the over-65 population, and the administrative costs to the SSA involved in making income determinations, measuring need, and policing the system would be significant. The only thing it would achieve would be to turn Social Security into welfare, leaving it badly damaged and ready for the next big political hit.

There are some very serious issues with Durbin being the messenger of doom for progressives on this. First, framing the Obama proposal as the left pole in negotiations, meaning that any truly progressive budget approach is shoved out entirely, irrelevant. The other problem is that Durbin is Obama's closest ally in the Senate, and that the Obama administration is to some extent involved with the Gang of Six negotiations. National Economic Council Director Gene B. Sperling has spoken with them. The extent to which Durbin is paving the way for the administration to back cuts to Social Security -- achieving that Grand Bargain -- is as of yet unclear, but the possibility cannot be ruled out.

All of which is so mind-numbingly politically stupid it's hard to believe it's coming out of Durbin's mouth. Supposedly, Obama and the Dems are planning on hinging the 2012 election on bashing the GOP for their proposed Medicare plan. That issue is blown out of the water if Social Security cuts happen on the Democrats' watch. Bad policy. Bad politics. Disastrous for America's middle class.

 

articles reprinted from Dailykos.com
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Rush Limbaugh's Sponsor List

Comcast favors Fox News, charges $204 more for MSNBC package. ACTION NEEDED

Ron Paul takes lead In Iowa, Newt Gingrich falls off cliff

Busted: Scott Walker fell for Prankster posing as David Koch

The Bundy Ranch flashpoint, one Nevadan's perspective

Meet Foster Friess, Billionaire who Bought Iowa for Santorum

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

but nevertheless sent him this e-mail this morning... by John Sanchez Jr. on Wednesday, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:14:42 AM
This marvelous analysis will be hidden as a commen... by Sheila Samples on Wednesday, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:35:24 PM