Tags for This Article:

Government (3581) Congress (3367) Democracy (1979) Politics (1578) Justice (1477) Religion (1191) Presidency (819) Progressive Values - Issues (721) Poverty (671) Taxes (539) Education (489) Taxes (384) Liberty (378) Libertarian (209) Happiness (166) Conservative Right (72)


Populum
Tag Cloud
Control Panel

Fine tune your search to access content

Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
June 21, 2008 at 10:35:23

View Ratings | Rate It

Dear Conservative:

by Robert Cogan     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

You are proud of what you personally have struggled to accomplish and of your country. But you are angry at our government and some fellow citizens. Some of your dissatisfaction has just cause. But you frequently complain about government or taxes or “those people.” “Those people” frequently have even less education and less money than you do.

But pride is not a virtue. It's a sin according to every major religion's scriptures, the Old Testament, New Testament, Koran, and those of Hinduism and Buddhism. And scriptures also tell us that anger is sinful too, and needs to be controlled. What happens is God's plan. Anger at it is a rejection of God's plan. And anger harms the angry person himself: it raises blood pressure and contributes to strokes and heart attack.

Why are governments “instituted among men?” Our Declaration of Independence says it is to secure to us the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But you don't have a right to life really, if you don't have air you can breathe without getting sick from it, water that safe to drink, cook and bathe in, safe food, adequate clothing, shelter and some medical care. And you don't have real liberty or ability to pursue happiness unless you can get an education that enables you to get skills that allow you to choose to work in one or more jobs or places.

These fundamental things aren't cheap! They are expensive! I know that you frequently don't have much money to pay taxes. But sometimes you are complaining about people even poorer than you, while the truth is that very rich people get off paying proportionally much less of their incomes in taxes than you do. Before complaining about taxes and too many government workers, please remember main functions that government employees perform.

What government workers should we have less of? Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, Veterans hospital workers, police, troopers, and prison guards who protect life and liberty? Should we have instead more privately employed retail clerks? Or maybe there should be a cut back in Water Department workers who make sure the water is safe to use, or Sewer departments that take poisonous wastes away? In their place should we have more privately employed workers in plastic factories? How about cutting out infrastructure maintenance and having more private janitors, etc.? Think how expensive it is to maintain or replace bridges or levees in New Orleans or along the Mississippi river: it costs hundreds of billions of dollars. Whatever the source of climate change may be, the U.N. Has estimated that the nations of the world will have to spend $20 trillion to adjust to it over the next 20 years. Where there are costs, there will also be benefits, but the wealthy will find ways to exploit those benefits.

Would you really want to give up Social Security and Medicare to cut payroll taxes? Are you sure on the income you have had that you could voluntarily have saved enough to pay your own medical bills and for decades of retirement? If you want SS and Medicare for yourselves, even though it is partially paid for by the taxes of others, is it fair to complain if some of your taxes go to help pay for it for others?

Education is very expensive, but do you really want to cut school taxes greatly? If the next generation of kids aren't educated well enough, they won't be able to be employed productively enough to contribute to your social security and medical care.

Why was the Constitution of our country formed? The Constitution itself says:

“We the people,... in order to form a more perfect Union, establish justice, insure Domestic Tranquility, promote the General Welfare, and secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity...”

Increasing inequalities of wealth versus poverty make for a less perfect union, envy, and anger. They promote crime, which is injustice, not justice and Domestic disturbance rather than Tranquility. Poverty restricts rather than enhances Liberty. The poorer you are, the less free you are to go where you want and do what you want. And please remember the purpose “to promote the general Welfare!”

You complain about personal laziness and schools not doing their job. The truth is that children of very poor people, whether black, white, yellow or red, are disadvantaged from birth, or maybe even before conception. Their mothers have poor diets, and other health problems that leave their babies less healthy, born into poor homes. Spina bifida, for example, is related to a deficiency of folic acid in mom's diet. Studies of meaningful differences in the experiences of young American children show that the poorest adults speak much less to their babies and offer less encouragement than do adults in middle class families, and middle class adults speak somewhat less to their children and encourage them less than do wealthy adults, who also provide much more stimulus from toys and learning objects, not just TV. And runaway fathers are hardly confined to black men who may have no resources for support. By the time very poor children get to school, they are much less capable of schooling than middle class and wealthy family children. Schools are a false scapegoat for the effects of poverty!

Yes, there are some differences of behavior and values between subcultures in our un-melted pot of a country and throughout the world. But it's judgmental and prideful to hold many or all of another group in contempt for differences they may not be able to help. Judge not, that you be not judged. We all make some poor choices. We marry Mr. or Ms. Wrong and 50% end up in divorce. We smoke, drink, we buy SUV's and bottled water. We mostly don't even choose our religion but are born into it. But we pridefully choose to believe it is the only true religion and morality and others hold “false religions.” And we try to impose ours on them. Historically this has led to terrible killing.

Our federal government as a whole is extremely corrupted by campaign contributors and special interests. That goes for Congress as well as the Presidency, and Democrats as well as Republicans. They serve these concentrations of wealth and votes. Twice we chose to elect a president partly because he said he was Born Again, a “Compassionate Conservative” and shared our values. But he's recently admitted that he abused alcohol up to age 40. And he has been terribly badly advised and served by others. Pride tends to prevent our admitting poor choices and correcting them. Let's put it aside, stop trying to force our religious and political values (like voting democracy for Muslim countries) on others, and make a better choice next election. Please put a little study into the Libertarian and or Green parties. They can only grow, and do better, if you do so.

Please pass these words on, if you find good in them.

Your Friend, Progressive

 

The author is a 67 year old, white male American retired college professor of philosophy. He is a long-time minor activist in the civil rights, anti-war, profeminism movements and taught critical thinking and social philosophy. He has been a unionist, on the Board of Directors of a food coop, an ACLU chapter president, a CASA, and is currently an elected Green Party member nearing, with relief, the end of a 4-year term as a Borough Councilman in his small hometown. He is happily married, for 37 years, to a woman significantly responsible for his modest success in life, the couple have two great kids.

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 comments

Hater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired
John HanksHater of Nazis above all. Hobbies include activism, military model building, military history, exciting and vital conversation with retired crooks. Retired

Republicans are not conservative.

They are radical criminals and they are deaf to any moral appeal or argument.  They are no different from Nazis or Communists or Zionists.  They will lie, cheat, steal and kill to secure any advantage.  Everything about them is decadent, pornographic, and bogus.  Their patriotism is treason.  Their religion is a vicious and cruel con job.  They pander and feed on every human weakness.

 

by John Hanks (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1485 comments) on Sunday, June 22, 2008 at 11:19:18 PM
 


A concerned citizen and former mathematician/engineer now retired and living in rural Maine.
PrMaineA concerned citizen and former mathematician/engineer now retired and living in rural Maine.

To be Fair

Not all Republican are conservative, but some are.  Some Democrats are conservative, most are not. 

I do agree that a terrible sickness has infected the Republican party that seems to make them, as a political party, what you describe.  As a party, Republicans cheat, steal and lie to achieve their ends and as a result people are leaving that party.  If the Republican party withers and dies, I say good riddance, but something else wil take its place.  The battle will continue. 

by PrMaine (13 articles, 12 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 420 comments) on Monday, June 23, 2008 at 9:09:20 AM
 


The author is a 67 year old, white male American retired college professor of philosophy. He is a long-time minor activist in the civil rights, anti-war, profeminism movements and taught critical thinking and social philosophy. He has been a unionist, on the Board of Directors of a food coop, an ACLU chapter president, a CASA, and is currently an elected Green Party member nearing, with relief, the end of a 4-year term as a Borough Councilman in his small hometown. He is happily married, for 37 ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Robert CoganThe author is a 67 year old, white male American retired college professor of philosophy. He is a long-time minor activist in the civil rights, anti-war, profeminism movements and taught critical thinking and social philosophy. He has been a unionist, on the Board of Directors of a food coop, an ACLU chapter president, a CASA, and is currently an elected Green Party member nearing, with relief, the end of a 4-year term as a Borough Councilman in his small hometown. He is happily married, for 37 ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Drawing Distinctions

I agree with the sentiment but can't really draw a clear, bright line between Republicans as criminal and Democrats who take special interest money and vote for enormous bills that also allow criminality by whoever. Whenever you hear "deregulation" for example, you can be certain embezzlement, fraud, unjust enrichment, etc. will follow. And the Clinton administration led a lot of that in laws like the Private Securities Litigation "Reform" Act, etc.

 Someone once said "Republicans and Democrats are two wings of the Vulture Party. " I like that saying.

by Robert Cogan (12 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 at 2:06:21 PM
 


The author is a 67 year old, white male American retired college professor of philosophy. He is a long-time minor activist in the civil rights, anti-war, profeminism movements and taught critical thinking and social philosophy. He has been a unionist, on the Board of Directors of a food coop, an ACLU chapter president, a CASA, and is currently an elected Green Party member nearing, with relief, the end of a 4-year term as a Borough Councilman in his small hometown. He is happily married, for 37 ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Robert CoganThe author is a 67 year old, white male American retired college professor of philosophy. He is a long-time minor activist in the civil rights, anti-war, profeminism movements and taught critical thinking and social philosophy. He has been a unionist, on the Board of Directors of a food coop, an ACLU chapter president, a CASA, and is currently an elected Green Party member nearing, with relief, the end of a 4-year term as a Borough Councilman in his small hometown. He is happily married, for 37 ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Reply

Thanks for your comment, John. I tend to agree. For a long time in life I wrote like you have here. But finally I came to the conclusion that writing that way might make me feel a little better for a while, but was not helpful in persuading anyone of different views. My hope is that although I put this on a liberal or progressive site, it would be circulated, even to things like "Town Hall," and "Free Republic" .

by Robert Cogan (12 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Monday, June 23, 2008 at 7:32:36 PM
 


retired schoolteacher
Married and mother of two.
Hobbies: Pottery, reading, studying world affairs, music & gardening
I was broken hearted after 9-11 and didn't know where to turn. All around me people were buying into the MSM. While I knew we were being manipulated (PNAC)it seemed I was alone. Got very depressed, especially after the invasions or Iraq and Afganistan. Millions of innocent people slaughtered. WE were told to shop. Since then I've been on my own investigative jou...

to see more of bio, click on member name

JoAnn Walkerretired schoolteacher
Married and mother of two.
Hobbies: Pottery, reading, studying world affairs, music & gardening
I was broken hearted after 9-11 and didn't know where to turn. All around me people were buying into the MSM. While I knew we were being manipulated (PNAC)it seemed I was alone. Got very depressed, especially after the invasions or Iraq and Afganistan. Millions of innocent people slaughtered. WE were told to shop. Since then I've been on my own investigative jou...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Conservatives like to blame welfare

Thank you so much for your article. I just received this email from a lady I know and wondered how I could respond with a more accurate list of the things that are ruining our country. Here is her list. Perhaps someone reading this could revise it into something appropriate.

NEW PREAMBLE TO THE CONSTITUTION

 

This is probably the best e-mail I've seen in a long, long time. The following has been attributed to State Representative Mitchell Kaye from GA. This guy should run for President one day..

 

"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional.  We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."

 

ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

 

ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc.; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.

 

ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.

 

ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes. Get an education and go to work. ...don't expect everyone else to take care of you!

 

ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested in public health care.

 

ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.

 

ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.

 

ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful. (AMEN!)

 

ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.

 

ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care where you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came from! (Lastly....)

 

ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!

 

 

If you agree, share this with a friend. No, you don't have to, and nothing tragic will befall you if you don't. I just think it's about time common sense is allowed to flourish. Sensible people of the United States speak out because if you do not, who will?

 

by JoAnn Walker (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 7 comments) on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 at 8:47:14 PM
 


The author is a 67 year old, white male American retired college professor of philosophy. He is a long-time minor activist in the civil rights, anti-war, profeminism movements and taught critical thinking and social philosophy. He has been a unionist, on the Board of Directors of a food coop, an ACLU chapter president, a CASA, and is currently an elected Green Party member nearing, with relief, the end of a 4-year term as a Borough Councilman in his small hometown. He is happily married, for 37 ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Robert CoganThe author is a 67 year old, white male American retired college professor of philosophy. He is a long-time minor activist in the civil rights, anti-war, profeminism movements and taught critical thinking and social philosophy. He has been a unionist, on the Board of Directors of a food coop, an ACLU chapter president, a CASA, and is currently an elected Green Party member nearing, with relief, the end of a 4-year term as a Borough Councilman in his small hometown. He is happily married, for 37 ...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Reply to New Constitution

I like sarcasm even though I think it's not effective in persuading people to change their opinions. I love the Preamble. As to the rest, there are parts I like and others I think need some revision. For example, I like Art. 1 Sentence 1 but think the second sentence needs some revision. On Art. 3, one needs to find a  way of dealing with sometimes unsafe products put in the "stream of commerce" maybe by "badvertising" and not modified even after they are found to hurt or kill people. Canned meat, for example, in Civil war times, could easily kill you through poisons, some not easily detectable. The way law deals with that now is "strict liability" which leads to fines hopefully big enough to stop production of profitable but dangerous products. But it's unsatisfactory. SUV's and large pickup trucks, for example, not only guzzle gas and drive the price up for everybody else, and present visibility hazards. They have a proven engineering defect: centers of gravity so high most rollovers are caused simply by their "tripping" over the drop from road surface to berm, or low curbs, or guard rails. But it wouldn't be right to apply strict liability to them...or to do nothing at all about them.

 While on the subject, even a lame duck president or Congress could force readoption of the 55 mph speed limit from the 1973 oil embargo days - just withold federal highway money until the states enact it. But I haven't heard that Bush, Cheney, Congress or the Panderdates McCain or Obama yet say those dirty words "conservation," and "efficiency." Sometimes I wonder if they can perform the governmental equivalent of "activities of daily living!"

 

by Robert Cogan (12 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 13 comments) on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 at 4:27:47 PM
 

 

6 comments

 

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

John S. Greenway by AJ Buttacavoli

Cancer Full Moon January 10-11 2009 by Cathy Lynn Pagano

Breaking The Real "Last Taboo" - The Things No One Dares To Say by Frank Schaeffer

Preliminary Memorandum of the Justice Robert H. Jackson Conference on Federal Prosecutions of War Criminals by Lawrence Velvel

Goodbye to Bush in Three Minutes by David Swanson

FOOD SAFETY REGULATIONS - the intended QUICKSAND now taking under all sustainable agriculture by Linn Cohen-Cole

Amnesty vs. AIPAC: Senate to Consider AIPAC Resolution Endorsing War in Gaza by Robert Naiman

Unlawful Assembly by David Swanson

Boot Bush on 19th by David Swanson

More about sociopaths in American politics by Gene Messick

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2009