Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   20 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds


By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 11/12/10

When President Obama announced that he would be naming a commission to work out a plan for reduction of the national debt, some of us expected that the people to be named would include such names as Paul Krugman and Jonathan Turley, a man with expertise in matters financial, and one with great knowledge of history and constitutionality. Instead, he named as co-chairs Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson, which thoroughly dampened any hope for a real progressive solution that could possibly solve the problem.

The rest of the panel was merely an afterthought to most of us. It was much like his announcement of all the Clinton/Bush retreads to work with him in the White House. Without a doubt, these people and their opinions lowered our expectations and hopes for a really progressive program of reform in the most necessary areas of government.

As for the commission "co-chairs," the selection of these two men was the most perplexing. Both held their positions of importance in a totally different era and have seen no reason to change their minds about anything since the Reagan years. Former Senator Simpson was always a hard-right Republican who felt that the government had no business even dabbling in the area of health care or the welfare of the common people. He spent almost his entire career in trying to eliminate Social Security and every other vestige that we ever had, thanks to a president named Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Erskine Bowles served about the same amount of time as an adviser to a number of presidents in years gone by, in between hitches on Wall Street.

Now, both of these esteemed gentlemen spend their time sitting in their lavish homes, re-living their days of glory, secure in their respective government pensions, and complaining that their fat investment portfolios are so successful that they still must pay a bit of income tax. Their own retirement is secure and they don't want their heirs to pay any tax for the privilege of inheriting their assets when they pass. Both chafe at the prospect of any of "their money" being used to support those "lesser people" who were less fortunate, (or more compassionate) than they. In short, chalk up one more bad decision by President Obama.

Now we are back to Square One; how should the problem be handled? When pondering problems of national finance, I find it very useful to consult my friend, Richard, and I did so this morning when discussing the news. He had one of the best takes on the problem that I have heard:
"We read all the time the right-wing garbage that 'every man, woman, and child owes $135,000 as their share of the national debt.' Let's be perfectly fair and divide it equally among all of us -- right after we divide income and wealth the same way -- equally. After all, we do want to be perfectly fair, don't we?"
Realistically, we know that this is not going to happen! But the answer is still out there in that unexplored space where Congressional Republicans and a large number of Democrats refuse to go. Letting the Bush tax cuts expire would be a huge leap forward. Granted, it would not please the Middle Class or anybody else. But it's called "sacrifice," something with which those of us who can recall World War II are intimately familiar.

Nobody has ever yet been asked to sacrifice to pay for Bush's Wars. It has all been done on the national credit card; all the unnecessary spare parts and second engines for the fighter planes, the rip-offs by the "civilian contractors," the pay-offs to the blackmailing despots that we installed in the conquered territories. All of it has been kicked down the road with the intent of leaving the payment to generations yet unborn.

Now, we have reached the end of the road. Bush's bar tab must be paid. The bouncers are ready to break a few kneecaps, and we have no choice but to pay. The leaders of the United States have been on a 10-year power binge but now the bar is closed. While the leaders of the nation want to penny-pinch their way out of the situation, cutting off the flow of food to the kids and the elders will not do it. With the 90% top tax rate of the Eisenhower years lodged in the memory, the answer seems clear.

The only funds available to the government come from taxation and that is the monster that keeps the rich awake at night. That's okay. While they're lying awake, worrying about their stockpile of cash and investments being "raided," the rest of us are lying awake, worrying about how we will manage to pay the rent or feed the kids until we can earn or borrow more money. It is well past time that the "have-nots" tell the "haves" -- "Welcome to the club! We have to pay our bills or live on the street. Now you must pay yours because there is no room for you in our neighborhood."

The exorbitant tax breaks must go! The rates must be adjusted upward. The bills must be paid. Now, just do it!


This writer is eighty years old and has spent a half century working with handicapped and deprived people and advocating on their behalf while caring for her own workung-class family. She spends her "Sunset Years" in writing and struggling with The (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)


The Naked Truth About Rape

Sarah Palin Simply Does Not Matter

Revolt of the Grannies!

The Truth about Your Income Tax



The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 20 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
We are entitled to entitlement programs like Socia... by Linda Ross on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:54:19 AM
Do you get the feeling that all obama's "picks" we... by bruce powell on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 9:38:52 AM
how much influence la Hillary had on the persons h... by Mary Pitt on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:52:14 AM
I always have voted for Nader until I felt I had t... by bruce powell on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:19:41 PM
First because she was Obama's opponent in the prim... by Mary Pitt on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:03:28 PM
Dept "Commission". Please.Anytime you see the wor... by 911TRUTH on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:17:51 AM
but the people who were on it were not. It was sim... by Mary Pitt on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:01:50 PM
I saw through Obushbama long before the election. ... by 911TRUTH on Sunday, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:18:38 AM
but I see no message except defeatism. I admired t... by Mary Pitt on Sunday, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:54:24 PM
did you vote for obama? was it not wasted?... by hourglass on Sunday, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:18:29 PM
It helped to make sure that our current administra... by Mary Pitt on Sunday, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:29:22 PM
If a new kind of commerce emerges it follows that ... by Margaret Bassett on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:25:54 PM
When I was a child in school, I was so impressed b... by Mary Pitt on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:49:55 PM
Lots of history - Use SC 08 primary as a focal poi... by Margaret Bassett on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 4:38:08 PM
Maybe the reason for our national aversion to wome... by Mary Pitt on Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 6:40:21 PM
This deals with whether we believe in retrospect t... by Margaret Bassett on Monday, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:59:20 AM
Sometimes it's enough to boggle the mind. The Tea ... by Mary Pitt on Monday, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:59:17 AM
It details the here and now and puts all Americans... by Margaret Bassett on Monday, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:39:10 PM
I believe he can be a fearsome defender of the nee... by Mary Pitt on Monday, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:53:04 PM
...What SHE said! We love you Margaret...... by Sheila Samples on Monday, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:22:14 PM