Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

Cypress College's Peter Mathews interview with Stephen Fox on California, eventually labeling aspartame as a carcinogen

By       Message Stephen Fox     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 10/18/16

Author 4578
Become a Fan
  (14 fans)
- Advertisement -

The URL is:

This is a long but thorough interview, with real insights as to why labeling aspartame as a carcinogen is not only a vital issue in regard to protecting health, but also a vital political issue, in terms of rolling back the evil influence of one of the biggest Neocons of them all, Donald Rumsfeld, who forced the FDA approval for Aspartame in 1981 (the other is Dick Cheney, in my humble opinion).

Just truthfully labeling it as the carcinogen it has always been, by the State of California under Proposition 65, is a major step towards righting some of the worst wrongs existent in our beleaguered world, and certainly, just to start to correct the worst abuses of the regulatory processes that were visited upon Government in the last half of the 20th Century.

The Proposition 65 impetus should be extended to other states under existing statutes, whenever possible, if they don't have the same precise legal machinery allowed under Prop. 65. Gradually, the heavy mantle of Rumsfeld's oppression must be removed, even if only incrementally.

For the startling testimony of New Mexico's most progressive State Senator, Gerald Ortiz y Pino, plus Fox's condensed history of the total regulatory failure inherent in aspartame still being on the market, please also see this important earlier OpEdNews article:

- Advertisement -

New Mexico State Senator Ortiz y Pino Supports California Labeling of Aspartame as Carcinogenic

- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

I have most recently started a Facebook group: Bernie Sanders: Advice and Strategies to Help Him Win! As the primary season advanced, we shifted the focus to advancing Bernie's legislation in the Senate, particularly the most critical one, to (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

CA Exit Polls reveal 23% Discrepancy; 11 States With Vote "Flipping" Evidence; Our New Directions in American History?

In the California Primary, More Ballots Remain Uncounted than the Total Number of votes for Hillary Clinton!

What does Coca Cola's Dasani bottled water have in common with Death by Lethal Injection?

Mirena Interuterine Devices can cause Depression, Mood swings, Acne, Back Pain, Uterine Cysts, and Uterine Perforations

Comments Image Post Article Comment

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
Connect with Facebook     Connect with Twitter            Register with Facebook     Register with Twitter


You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments  Post Comment

Stephen Fox

Become a Fan
Author 4578

(Member since Jan 21, 2007), 14 fans, 169 articles, 5 quicklinks, 1237 comments, 14 diaries

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

  New Content

Excellent and thorough interview, with the listen, and hopefully, one that will inspire the reader to send in your own letter in the remaining 5 days that your email can be accepted in Sacramento as testimony and as commentary on why this labeling should proceed under Proposition 65, some unique California legal machinery to protect the health of its citizens.

Submitted on Tuesday, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:08:41 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)

Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment