Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Could a Cuban Human Rights Organization be Outraged over Government's Pact with the U.S.? Well, Yes.

By       Message Steven Jonas     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 1/7/15

Author 50778
Become a Fan
  (15 fans)
- Advertisement -

Reprinted from Greanville Post


Author's Note: The Statement of the "Human Rights Organization of Cuba," a fictional body, is itself fiction (except that it is of course, in its content based upon fact).

Following the joint announcement by the offices of the Presidents of Cuba and the United States of the intention to re-establish diplomatic relations and in the meantime ease joint restrictions on travel, cultural exchanges, certain types of commercial relationships, etc., while jointly releasing/exchanging several high-profile prisoners, a wide variety of anti-Cuban US organizations, politicians, and individuals went nuts over that announcement.

They cited "human rights violations" on the part of the Cuban government (mainly dealing with civil liberties, and the supposed "rights" of those who would violently overthrow the Cuban Revolution) as THE reason why there never should or could be normal relations established between the two countries.

Sen. Marco Rubio, the son of "persons who fled dictatorship in Cuba" is a prime example of this sort of thinking. (Somehow, it happens that Sen. Rubio never happens to mention that the Cuban dictatorship they fled was that of the U.S.-supported Fulgencio Batista, and that they "fled" for purely economic reasons. The family saw greener pastures elsewhere. But that is another story.)

Suppose in Cuba there was something like an "ODHC" (the "Human Rights Organization of Cuba"), concerned with human rights violations -- in the United States. And then who knows, if there were such a one, they might issue the following (totally fictional) blistering attack on President Castro for his move towards normalization. For this space, this is how such a statement would read in English.

"We, the Human Rights Organization of Cuba, are outraged by the recently announced joint decision by our President and President Obama of the United States to move towards a normalization of relations between our two countries. Of course, one could point out that until the trade embargo imposed by the United States in 1961, put into law by the U.S. Congress in 1992 and then further expanded by President Clinton in 1999, is lifted, there can be no true 'normalization.' But even before that were to occur, we must take exception to the whole idea of our nation entering into such a series of agreements with the greatest violator of human rights on the face of the Earth.

- Advertisement -


"It should be noted that Rightists in both major U.S. political parties (which are actually one party with two faces) have criticized President Obama for engaging in this significant change in the relationship between our two nations, based on what they claim is Cuba's record on human rights. However, all they can refer to is our nation's acting to protect itself against both open and covert allies of the United States who would overthrow our Revolution if they could.

"We, on the other hand, can point to a long record of human rights violations by the United States, both domestic and foreign, which is second to none, and which has nothing to do with any planned or hoped-for attempts to overthrow the U.S. government. This list is far from complete. It should be noted that we are here briefly reporting what we regard only as the principal ones...

"1. Perhaps the greatest one is the manner in which the United States, at both the governmental and non-governmental levels, treats its citizens of color -- African-Americans, Latinos, and Native Americans are the principal groups here -- in segregation, especially in housing, in educational disparities, in employment opportunity, in imprisonment, and of course, in a series of incidents, highlighted recently but representing what the Yankees call 'business as usual,' illustrating how their young males are routinely treated by the police. The originally Southern Doctrine of White Supremacy now covers the nation as a whole.

"2. To the extent that one of the two leading political parties can manage it, women are routinely discriminated against in terms of abortion and contraceptive rights, employment opportunities, and equal pay for equal work.

"3. Until very recently, one of the two leading political parties has made discrimination against the lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender (LGBT) community a central plank in their party's national and state platforms. Although there have been major changes in the U.S. on these issues in recent years, the Party is still fighting a strong rear-guard action against them. The Republican Party is still fighting hard to allow discrimination in employment based on 'religious beliefs' that tries, without success, to hide the policy's blatant homophobia.

"4. To the extent that class divisions and concentration of wealth and income can be characterized as human rights issues, among the advanced capitalist countries, the United States has one of the widest gaps on both measures, between the wealthy and everyone else.

- Advertisement -

"5. The right to vote is perhaps the most basic of the civil rights. The Right in the United States has always attempted to deprive working people, especially those of color, and women, of their right to vote. In the aftermath of the U.S. Civil War, the first objective of the then newly formed Ku Klux Klan, was to prevent the newly freed slaves form voting, by the use of violence. This was the policy of the Democratic Party in the South until the explosion of the civil rights movement in the 1960s. Then, first under President Nixon, the Republican Party's "Southern Strategy" was implemented. (Note: Many editors at TGP do not support the electoral track as a viable option to change society in the United States, and endorse a boycott and other options, while explaining to the masses why not voting is and should be seen as a vote of rejection for the status quo and its fraudulent elections.--Eds)

"In its contemporary form, the party is using its control of an increasing number of state governments, in part through changing the borders of the electoral districts to concentrate Democratic voters in a small number of them (quaintly called 'Gerrymandering'), and in part by requiring 'Voter IDs' which are for the most part made very difficult and relatively expensive to obtain, especially by students, non-whites and the elderly, the Republican Party is engaged in an increasingly effective campaign to sharply limit voting rights among those groups in society which are less likely to vote for them.

"6. Then there is money in politics. Increasingly, with the cooperation of the Republican Supreme Court and politicians of both major parties, at both the Federal and State levels, an increasing number of government offices are simply bought and sold. This practice certainly violates the human right, in what is supposed to be a democracy, to have truly representative government.

"7. One could go into great detail about the fact that the United States does not guarantee the basic right to health care for all of its citizens, as every other developed capitalist country, to say nothing of our own, does. We will not, here.

"8. Finally, for this list we come to the use of torture as an official policy of the U.S. government. There can be no worse violation of human rights than engaging in this medieval practice on a regular basis, with the support of the highest levels of government. It happens that its use violates Article VI of the United States' own Constitution, which supposedly makes both the Geneva Agreements and the United Nation Convention against torture part of its 'supreme law of the land.' For Cuba, this practice is especially egregious since so much of it occurred on Cuban soil in the so-called 'Guantanamo Bay Naval Base,' that was stolen from our nation under an unequal lease originally negotiated in 1903.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://thepoliticaljunkies.org/
Steven Jonas, MD, MPH, MS, is a Professor of Preventive Medicine at the School of Medicine, Stony Brook University (NY) and author/co-author/editor/co-editor of over 30 books on health policy, health and wellness, and sports and regular exercise. In (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pope Francis and Change in the Roman Catholic Church

Limbaugh, Santorum, Sex, and the Origins of the Roman Catholic Church

Gay Marriage and the Constitution

The "Irrepressible Conflict" and the Coming Second Civil War

The Republican Party and the Separation of Church and State: Change Does Happen

What the Gunners Want: What's in Rick Perry's Pocket, Unlimited