Life Arts

Correlated: presidential preference and intelligence

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

- Advertisement -

Folks from states which favor Obama seem to be significantly more intelligent than those from states which favor McCain.

The Disclaimer:

This is an unprofessionally-produced statistical analysis I have thrown together using data from online sources (current as of September 24). Here's how I did it:

The Data:

I took the estimated average IQs from a table at which computed intelligence from SAT scores by state (utilizing a table at The averages are well above 100 because they are derived from college-bound SAT scores.

Then, from RealClear Politics I created the following variables:

1 - solid McCain 2 - leaning McCain 3 - toss up 4 - leaning Obama 5 - solid Obama
So, Texas (solidly pro-McCain) is a 1, North Carolina is a 2, Florida (a toss up) is a 3, Oregon is a 4, and Massachusetts (solidly pro-Obama) is a 5.

The actual data table I created is at the end of this article.

The Results:

- Advertisement -

A Spearman Rank Correlation produced a probability of 0.005, which is generally considered a highly significant correlation. (It means that the probability that the relationship found between estimated IQ and candidate preference was due to chance was 1 in 200.)

The Conclusion:

It strongly suggests that states with more intelligent citizenry (by virtue of being better educated) are more likely to favor Obama than McCain.

The Discussion:

There's some problematic history to such claims. A few years ago, a series of "studies" purported to show that states with more intelligent inhabitants were much more likely to vote for Kerry than for Bush: for example, Unfortunately, the estimated IQs were never found to be valid and were largely dismissed as fraudulent.

- Advertisement -

In 2006, conservative Steve Sailer, founder of the Human Biodiversity Institute and movie critic for The American Conservative, published new figures based upon the work of Michael McDaniel, a professor of business at my old alma mater, Old Dominion University. He computed an insignificant probability (-0.12) that there was a correlation between average state IQ and voting for Bush over Kerry, thus claiming to debunk the notion that intelligence and voting patterns were related.

Why is my analysis different from Sailer's? I can't say. I'm not a statistician; I'm a clinical psychologist (very familiar with IQ tests in an assessment context), and while I have some basic knowledge of statistics (and used rather complex canonical models for my thesis and dissertation), I've done no such analyses in many years. I'm certain a competent statistician or research designer would find shortcomings in my design, and challenge my conclusion. I'm certain questions may be raised regarding the validity of candidate preferences from RealClear, the actual relationship between SAT scores and estimates of IQ, and the appropriateness of the Spearman statistic. But, for now, I'm just putting it out there to provoke some discussion, perhaps to compel others to do more serious work addressing the issue.

And asking. . . is anyone really surprised?

Next Page  1  |  2


A bluegrass bassplayer, photographer, husband and father, Dr. Deaunym is also a clinical psychologist in north Georgia. He considers his views truly conservative: those of our founding fathers (and mothers) such as Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, who (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Correlated: presidential preference and intelligence

Political Circus 2008

What Jefferson would say about Huckabee


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Interesting that Washington DC has the only two-di... by Meryl Ann Butler on Thursday, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:12:01 PM
It is interesting that there appears to be a relat... by tabonsell on Friday, Sep 26, 2008 at 5:34:17 PM
It makes sense that the real association is betwee... by Sue Deaunym on Friday, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:37:28 PM