Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Considering Everything

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 8/31/13

- Advertisement -

If you were listening to NPR's All Things Considered this past August 27 you would have heard a typical corporate media discussion about the pros and pros of bombing Syria. The conversation was largely framed by two options. Should the US hit the Assad regime hard or hit it even harder? All things considered, it was hardly a consideration of all the things the US might possibly do to stop the bloodshed in the war torn Middle Eastern nation. The idea of seeking some kind of peaceful negotiated settlement between the fighting factions was nowhere to be found on the news desk. That's not to say NPR's coverage lacked a broader vision. In fact correspondent Mara Liasson went so far as to describe impending US military action in Syria as a "proxy war" with Iran, who she noted "is developing its own weapons of mass destruction."

While you could interpret a potential US military strike on Syria as a proxy war with Iran, the actual existence of Iranian nuclear or chemical weapons programs shouldn't be open to interpretation. It either has them or it doesn't. Liasson offered nothing to refute the latest IAEA findings that point to the absence of any Iranian program on the brink of building nuclear weapons nor did she give us even a whiff of evidence that Iran is producing chemical warfare agents. After digging deep down into her reporter's bag to get to the bottom of the story, the only thing she had to offer listeners was an unsubstantiated claim. I remember hearing one of those somewhere before. It was about ten years ago, when that exact same claim was the driving force behind the invasion of Iraq. In the run-up to the war in Iraq weapons of mass destruction was the hot news topic that quickly cooled off as hopes of actually finding any vanished into the thin air from which the reports came from in the first place.

NPR is not alone in reporting all the news that fits some narrative of its own making. In addition to highlighting Liasson's so far unregretted error, the media watchdog organization known as Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) has also seen the same mistake crop up elsewhere on the media landscape. FAIR cites an August 23 USA Today editorial making what the advocacy group says are "unsubstantiated assertions about Iran having a nuclear weapons program to advocate the bombing of Syria, arguing that a failure to attack would send a message to Tehran." The USA Today editorial says that holding back on bombing Syria "would demolish U.S. credibility, not just in Syria but also in Iran, which continues to pursue nuclear weapons despite repeated U.S. warnings." It ' s a bold statement to make, especially when USA Today hasn't presented a shred of proof to back up the claim about nuclear weapons in the hands of Tehran.

Unverified claims about weapons of mass destruction should sound vaguely familiar to most Americans. It's the drum beat that led us marching into the war in Iraq, where we never did find any weapons of mass destruction but instead much more than we ever bargained for. It's time for NPR's All Things Considered, USA Today, and perhaps other news outlets to consider changing their tune and start basing their reporting of this story and others on solid facts we can stand by instead of the shifting sands of speculation we have been given so far.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -


JT Cassidy resides in Yokohama, Japan. His writings have appeared in the Baltimore Sun, Commonweal Magazine, Common Dreams, Counterpunch, the Japan Times, and elsewhere.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Google Content Matches:
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Revolution Will Not Be Downloaded

No-nuke Protests Erupt in Japan

Reaching Critical Mass

Unlocking Imagination

US Beef Smells Fishy


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

NPR's All Things Considered and USA Today consider... by J.T. Cassidy on Saturday, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:53:41 PM
NPR's All Things Considered and other news outlets... by J.T. Cassidy on Saturday, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:59:30 PM
Sorry, I tweeted this twice by accident and I don'... by J.T. Cassidy on Saturday, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:54:42 PM
Furthermore see: A Whiff of Evidence and Impr... by J.T. Cassidy on Saturday, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:50:40 PM