Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
6 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Confront Corporate Personhood: Take Back our Planet

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H4 4/24/13

opednews.com

by  Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap   and  Heather Buckner

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/11945424@N05/8332476164/
by Daniel Hardman

With the 43rd anniversary of Earth Day this week, we have to wonder why the health of the planet is at an all time low.

How many people do you know who would aspire for a world without clean water to drink? How many are in favor of acid rain, food poisoning, or natural disaster? What about asthma? Higher cancer rates? Starvation? Do many of your friends dream of a United States without our glorious mountain-scapes, deciduous forests, or glistening lakes? Would any rational person want these things for their country, their children, themselves? The answer, obviously, is no, they wouldn't.

Numerous surveys and polls reinforce the reality that Americans' are overwhelmingly in favor of environmental protections. In fact, when asked to choose between environmental regulation and energy production, a whopping 94% of Americans believe in prioritizing protection of clean water and air over all else.

The American people don't want to destroy our environment, contaminate our water, poison our bodies, and clog our skies. To the contrary, we would overwhelmingly prefer increased regulation in order to protect our resources and sustain our earth. If this is so clearly the case, why then is the natural world literally being destroyed before our eyes? Why are there are no adequate laws controlling oil, food, water, land, and air, and why are the meager regulations we do have being blatantly ignored and repeatedly overturned?

The answers to these disconcerting questions are rooted in a history of concentrated power, corruption, and specifically, some very questionable Supreme Court decisions regarding the U.S Constitution. In January 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that "corporations are persons" under the first amendment, essentially entitling them to spend unlimited, unchecked money on political expenditures.

This ruling doesn't come out of nowhere. Indeed, it is merely the latest in a series of decisions dating back to the late 1800s which have granted corporations rights as human beings, allowing them to avoid regulation, and resulting in uncontrollable corporate influence over politics.

These days, such rulings have conveniently enabled large multinational corporations to shield destructive and illegal practices under the cloak of the US constitution. Through precedents set by the Supreme Court and reinforced time and again, wealthy corporations have convinced America to grant them personhood, with all the built-in constitutional rights.

But the obvious reality is that corporations are not people. They do not breathe, eat, or drink water. They have only one basic need: profit, and this in itself confirms the faulty logic of corporate personhood.

When people make decisions, we often think about financial gain too, but we also consider such matters as health, safety, happiness, social and environmental well-being. Corporate giants do not consider these things. They are businesses, not people, and it is fallacy to allow them control of decisions regarding the health of our people or our planet. Yet they have somehow been granted the right to cry "freedom of speech!" and "equal protection!" in order to avoid being held accountable to real humans.

Monsanto, for instance, cites the US Constitution in countless lawsuits to force unlabeled genetically engineered and chemically injected foods onto the public. In Vermont, Monsanto argued "free speech" to prevent the state from requiring labeling on dairy products containing Bovine Growth Hormones (rBGH). Just this month, the corporation snuck a legislative "rider' inside an unrelated Senate spending bill, which essentially gives the company complete immunity from any federal court action against any new Monsanto GMO crops that are suspected to be dangerous to the public or the environment.

Meanwhile, the fossil fuel industry has taken full advantage of "corporate personhood" to spend exorbitant amounts of money on lobbying and other political endeavors. In the 2012 election year, fossil fuel groups have spent more than $153 million on campaign ads to promote pro-fossil fuel candidates. One corporation, Chevron, contributed $2.5 million to a super PAC to elect House Republicans. In exchange for the support, Republicans voted consistently to protect the $2.4 billion in taxpayer subsidies to Big Oil. Meanwhile everyone else pays a hefty price. The True Cost of Chevron is a 64 page report highlighting some of Chevron's most outrageous crimes against humanity and nature.

The list of offenses by these and other corporate giants goes on and on. They claim "free speech," "property rights" and "equal protection," to avoid regulation, buy off politicians, and justify misconduct. In reality, if they really were people, they would be people guilty of such activities as bribery of public officials, grand theft, fraud, destruction of public property, money laundering, provoking unjust wars, and flat out murder.

So why has nobody arrested Chevron?

The American people have the right to protections for our health and our environment. We have the right to ensure our families have access to clean water, healthy food, and breathable air. This is why grassroots organizations through the Move to Amend Coalition are calling for a constitutional amendment to eliminate corporate personhood.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap is Executive Director of Democracy Unlimited. She grew up in Santa Fe, NM and came to Humboldt County in 2001 by way of Western Massachusetts where she was studying education and community at Hampshire College.

She (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Confront Corporate Personhood: Take Back our Planet

Congress Responds to Move to Amend Grassroots Organizing with "We the People" Amendment

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

and I think we should incorporate. Seriously. All ... by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:07:44 PM
Thanks for reading our article! I hope you'll sign... by Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap on Friday, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:47:21 PM
There was never the "right to free silence" and if... by BFalcon on Thursday, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:13:45 AM
The first amendment "-guarantees a right "not to s... by Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap on Friday, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:49:21 PM
And that the calims like this above are part of th... by BFalcon on Friday, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:47:55 PM
A faster way to supersede fossil and radioactive... by Mark Goldes on Thursday, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:11:00 PM