Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
23 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Columnist George Will Sides With Hitler, Not Churchill, and Uses Hitlerian Tactic to Do So

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 4   Must Read 2   News 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 1/20/14
Become a Fan
  (50 fans)

opednews.com

George Will, the far-right political commentator for the Washington Post, headlined on January 1st, "The Price of Political Ignorance: More Government," and he opened by implying that Winston S. Churchill despised the public and democracy and believed that they need to be manipulated by some elite, for their own good. In other words: he cited "Churchill" as validation of his own longstanding belief, which he was arguing for in that column.

This viewpoint that Will holds was actually first systematically asserted by Plato in his Republic (a book that Dr. Will himself admires), but in modern times it has come to be known as fascism -- the very thing against which Churchill famously waged war.

Here is how Will carried out his fascist deceit in that column:

Will implied, but did not directly assert, that Churchill held this actually fascist belief, by Will's opening with: "It was naughty of Winston Churchill to say, if he really did, that "the best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.'" Will said that this supposed quotation, from supposedly the conservative hero Churchill, "raises awkward questions about concepts central to democratic theory," and Will closed by praising a Koch-funded academic whose "evidence and arguments usefully dilute the unwholesome democratic sentimentality and romanticism that encourage government's pretensions, ambitions and failures," when that government happens to be democratic, as opposed to fascist.

However, those "awkward questions" about democracy were actually presented not just by Plato, but by Churchill's own mortal enemy, Adolf Hitler, who said, in Mein Kampf (v. 1, Ch. 3), that democracy "by forcing the individual to pass judgment on questions for which he is not competent, gradually debases his moral character," and (v. 2, Ch. 1), that "the impenetrable stupidity of the electorate" produces a government where "everyone gets everything he wants," until government becomes exhausted by all the pandering. (Thus, Will's own title was: "The Price of Political Ignorance: More Government." Will, like Hitler, believed in small government, by intrinsically superior people; not in big government, that cares for everybody.) Hitler's contempt for the electorate was visceral, when he said (v. 1, Ch. 3), "The revulsion of the masses for every outstanding genius is positively instinctive. Sooner will a camel pass through a needle's eye than a great man be 'discovered' by an election."

Did Churchill really agree with Hitler in despising democracy? No: it's just a snobbish fascist's attempt to produce yet another fascist Big Lie.

As recently as 24 April 2012, historian Richard M. Langworth headlined "Churchill on Democracy," and he opened: "Not by Churchill: "The best argument against Democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." Deseret News in Salt Lake City is the latest to publish this red herring. Commonly attributed to him, but with no authority, this is ... cynical." Then, Langworth linked to one of his own earlier postings, which quoted from Churchill's published writings and speeches on the subject, and which say such things as:

At the bottom of all the tributes paid to democracy is the little man, walking into the little booth, with a little pencil, making a little cross on a little bit of paper -- no amount of rhetoric or voluminous discussion can possibly diminish the overwhelming importance of that point. --House of Commons, 31 October 1944

How is that word "democracy' to be interpreted? My idea of it is that the plain, humble, common man, just the ordinary man who keeps a wife and family, who goes off to fight for his country when it is in trouble, goes to the poll at the appropriate time, and puts his cross on the ballot paper showing the candidate he wishes to be elected to Parliament -- that he is the foundation of democracy. And it is also essential to this foundation that this man or woman should do this without fear, and without any form of intimidation or victimization. He marks his ballot paper in strict secrecy, and then elected representatives ... decide what government, or even in times of stress, what form of government they wish to have in their country. If that is democracy, I salute it. I espouse it." --House of Commons, 8 December 1944

It is obvious that Churchill and Will would not be friends; they would be enemies. Hitler and Will would be friends. This is shown even more by Hitler's only publicly recorded (and enormously successful) fundraising speech. It was given at the Industry Club of Dusseldorf on 27 January 1932, and attended by virtually all of Germany's tycoons. He said:

This whole edifice of civilization is in its foundations and in all its stones nothing else than the result of the creative capacity, the achievement, the intelligence, the industry, of individuals: in its greatest triumphs it represents the great crowning achievement of individual God-favored geniuses. ... You maintain, gentlemen, that German business life must be constructed on a basis of private property. Now, you can defend such a conception as that of private property only if in some way or another it appears to have a logical foundation. This conception must deduce its ethical justification from an insight into the necessity that Nature dictates. [This "necessity' is the doctrine of Adam Smith's "invisible hand' of God.] ... Private property can be morally and ethically justified only if I admit that men's achievements are different. Only on that basis can I assert: since men's achievements are different, the results of [i.e., the fortunes resulting from] those achievements are also different. ... It is madness to say: in the economic sphere there are undoubtedly differences in individuals' value, but that is not true in the political sphere. [If that were so], there would emerge a cleavage between the economic and the political orders, and [the only way] to bridge that gap is to [repudiate the tendency that comes from the communists and from the democrats, their tendency to] make the political order swallow up and determine the economic order. [Hitler assumed here that one of these two must dominate over the other.] ... It is then absurd to allow this principle [of hierarchy] to hold good only in one sphere -- the sphere of economic life and its leadership -- and to refuse to acknowledge its validity in the [broader] sphere of the whole life-struggle of a people: the sphere of politics. ... To sum up the argument: I see two diametrically opposed principles: the principle of democracy which, wherever it is allowed practical effect is the principle of destruction: and the principle of the authority of personality which I would call the principle of [individual] achievement, because whatever man in the past has achieved -- all human civilizations -- is conceivable only if the supremacy of this principle [the supremacy of economics over politics] is admitted.

Mussolini famously tagged fascism as "the corporate state." The basic principle is that aristocrats, the people who control corporations, control the government. Churchill did not agree: he was anti-fascist.

Among fascists -- that is, extreme conservatives, people who believe in rule by the aristocracy (or else by a theocracy, which is just a religious form of aristocracy) -- the tactic is common of saying or implying that a certain "quotation" was said by one of the great proponents and defenders of democracy, such as Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, or other great Founders of America, or such as Winston Churchill, when that "quotation" is actually nowhere to be found in the given historical figure's writings or in the writings of that individual's personal acquaintances. The tactic is always done in order to provide "authority" for the given fascist belief, for readers who are democrats and who therefore respect the given falsely cited person. It is rampant on Fox "News" and other such "news" media. Few of these people have Ph.D degrees, or Pulitzer Prizes, but George Will has both. Neither certificate is a license to lie, even if it might have been won by lying effectively, and by not having been exposed by our "news" media even after decades of his doing it -- demonstrably lying or deceiving, which he certainly has done, though there has been space here to discuss only one instance of it.

Incidentally, that Koch-funded scholar earlier referred to is Ilya Somin, who also wrote other far-right things, such as an essay "Foot Voting," arguing in favor of what's otherwise known as the race to the bottom in corporate regulation and taxes: maximum competition between localities so that corporations will locate in places with the lowest regulation and lowest taxes, so that the public will take on that burden from which corporate owners are being freed, via the public's higher taxes, lower wages, and higher pollution (toxic air, water, and food). "Foot voting" (fascism) is compared to "ballot box voting" (democracy), which is portrayed as being vastly inferior. It's all just an elaborate and well-funded scam by aristocrats and their flaks such as George Will, fishing for conservative suckers.

----------

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They're Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

 

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They're Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010,  and of  CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Indications that the U.S. Is Planning a Nuclear Attack Against Russia

Harry Reid Effectively Kills Obama's TPP and TTIP International Trade Deals

Elizabeth Warren Comes Down Hard Against Global Warming, Separates Herself From Hillary Clinton on Climate Change

The Propaganda War About Ukraine: How Important It Really Is

Retiring Obama Administration Prosecutor Says the SEC Is Corrupt; Prior Reports Indicate Administration's Corruption

How Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Congressional Republicans, Created Child-Refugee Flood

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 23 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Churchill never said those words about the averag... by Richard Langworth on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:59:40 AM
You misrepresent what my article says. I said, "W... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:27:54 PM
Re. your "Churchill's views on democracy were mor... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:33:03 PM
Dead leaders should be judged by their actions mor... by Richard Pietrasz on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:38:23 PM
Great catch, Mr. Zuesse!I did not know, previous t... by Charles Roll on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:11:46 PM
Reminds me of Churchill's remark (one he did say)... by Richard Langworth on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:23:10 PM
Your misrepresenting what my article said is wors... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:07:50 PM
We are all gatekeepers of our memes.The star acto... by Peter Niniart on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:18:17 PM
Good article.  I've also read Mein Kampf, so ... by Derryl Hermanutz on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 3:48:23 PM
Dear oh dear. To know so much about Churchill is ... by Richard Langworth on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:44:20 PM
Another, even more famous thing Churchill did say ... by Maxwell on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:55:23 PM
You miss the intent of Will's distortions and lie... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:23:48 PM
People are fooled by GWill, but it is not always b... by Richard Pietrasz on Tuesday, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:06:02 PM
At this time, the fraction of historians that beli... by Richard Pietrasz on Tuesday, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:40:01 PM
 Time is a lofty perspective, and the facts ... by Susan Lee Schwartz on Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:34:36 PM
I am deeply touched by what you said. You told me... by Eric Zuesse on Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:49:34 PM
Thank you for the compliment, I appreciate it. ... by Richard Pietrasz on Thursday, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:47:55 PM
Churchill was also instrumental in bring the US i... by Maxwell on Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:28:32 PM
George Will is a swine of the highest order, thank... by Donn Marten on Monday, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:27:10 PM
George Will is a shill. That's why I stopped readi... by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:59:56 AM
Hee, hee. I adore your sense of humor, Dan, and t... by Susan Lee Schwartz on Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:17:09 PM
"That said, the Koch brothers are two of the 85 p... by Maxwell on Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:31:26 PM
I use to see Wills at a restaurant in Georgetown ... by Alejandro “EL CONDOR” Arce on Wednesday, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:27:47 AM