Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 6 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 9 (15 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   13 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Clinton's Environmental Failure

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 12/9/12

Become a Fan
  (11 fans)

Rumor is that Clinton's State Department is about to recommend approval of the Keystone Pipeline. (Kevin Lamarque/AFP-Getty Images)

It seems just a tad early to be thinking about the 2016 election -- unless, apparently, you're Hillary Clinton. According to Maureen Dowd in The New York Times, she sent handwritten notes to losing congressional candidates and invited big Irish-American donors on a trip to Dublin this week. "She has enormous strength in the Irish-American community because of the Clintons' massive role in bringing peace to Northern Ireland," explained the publisher of an Irish-American newspaper.

Which, to tell you the truth, wouldn't worry me very much if I was one of Clinton's possible contenders. True, she's sewing up the all-important Danny Boy vote -- but it's possible she's about to dump hot water on another sector of the electorate. 

That would be the ones who worry about climate change. Young people, they're called. Also people who have their houses flooded or their farms baked. They're more of them all the time, somehow -- in fact, pollsters find 68 percent of Americans "very worried" about global warming, up from 46 percent in 2009. That's what happens when the warmest year in American history ends with the widest storm (Sandy) ever measured.

But the rumor is that Clinton's State Department is nonetheless about to recommend approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline, which the top climate scientists in the nation have unanimously called a terrible idea. As far as I know, though, Clinton's subordinates haven't reached out to ask them why. For more than a year now, iLeaked emails show embassy officials rooting on the project; it's classic D.C. insiderism. (And, weirdly, her rumored successor is just as involved -- Susan Rice has millions in stock in TransCanada and other Canadian energy companies.)

And in one sense it doesn't make much difference. Everyone in the capital's also known that the Keystone decision, in the end, will come down to President Obama, who will weigh State's findings and then rule whether the pipeline is in the national interest. When that happens, we'll find out if he's a more modern politician than Hillary, or if he's still fighting yesterday's wars too.

The first term of his presidency was, in essence, devoted to dealing with the remaining problems of the 20th century. He crossed one off the list--America finally joined the rest of the industrialized world in offering most all its citizens some kind of health care. And he tackled another, with his endless pursuit of that will-o'-the-wisp "energy independence."

"Under my administration," he boasted last March, "America is producing more oil today than at any time in the last eight years. That's important to know. Over the last three years, I've directed my administration to open up millions of acres for gas and oil exploration across 23 different states. We're opening up more than 75 percent of our potential oil resources offshore. We've quadrupled the number of operating rigs to a record high. We've added enough new oil and gas pipeline to encircle the earth and then some."

And he's right--he's shown no interest in leaving any carbon anywhere in the ground. Hey, he watched the Arctic melt at a record pace and then he let Shell head up to the open water and drill.

So Keystone will test whether the second term will be more of the same. In his case, of course, he never has to worry about voters, or donors, again. But one guesses that 50 years from now the only item on his legacy list anyone will still care about is what he did on global warming. Will he nibble around the edges, or will he actually take on the oil companies? Keystone will tell the tale.

As for Clinton, she doubtless figures four years is a long time, and--even though it's the one environmental issue in decades that's brought big crowds of environmentalists into the streets--that voters will forget her stance on the pipeline. Maybe she's right. But she didn't get anything else accomplished on climate either--the Copenhagen conference was the biggest bust on her watch. And given that the planet just keeps getting warmer and weirder, it's possible greens have a memory almost as long as Irishmen.


Bill McKibben is the author of a dozen books, including The End of Nature and Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future. A former staff writer for The New Yorker, he writes regularly for Harper's, The Atlantic Monthly, and The (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Idle No More, Think Occupy With Deeper Roots

Global Warming's Terrifying New Math

Clinton's Environmental Failure

Obama and Climate Change: The Real Story

Keystone XL: A Choice Between Big Oil or a Sustainable Planet

Obama and the corruption of big oil


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Humans will be here 50 years hence!... by Daniel Geery on Sunday, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:14:43 PM
Humans will NOT be here as long as 50 years if the... by Michael Rose on Monday, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:12:26 AM
NO!  NO!  NO!!!!!  This pipeline ha... by Jerry Wesner on Sunday, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:19:13 PM
People have had their houses flooded and their far... by agwscam on Sunday, Dec 9, 2012 at 8:04:48 PM
Delusional. Keystone XL Pipeline was and is a done... by Art Costa on Sunday, Dec 9, 2012 at 8:18:09 PM
All true.  ... by frang on Tuesday, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:24:50 PM
Hillary is the American Margaret Thatcher.  I... by Marta B on Sunday, Dec 9, 2012 at 8:28:18 PM
Kucinich is not considered by the Democrat Party, ... by Dennis Kaiser on Monday, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:34:21 AM
I left out healthcare in things Kucinich favors mo... by Dennis Kaiser on Monday, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:35:32 AM
Good stuff.... by Don Caldarazzo on Sunday, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:10:19 PM
Someone's got to feed the mice that feed the liz... by Ned Lud on Monday, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:31:45 AM
Anyone who can look at that photo of HC (and ... by Ned Lud on Monday, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:36:28 AM
What is the body count of people who exposed the d... by Steven G. Erickson on Monday, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:00:33 AM