Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats

OpEdNews Op Eds

Clearing the Barr to a majority president with instant runoff voting

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 8/15/08

This year former Republican Congressman Bob Barr has won the Libertarian Party's nomination for president and will appear on the ballot this November in nearly every state. Consumer advocate Ralph Nader will join him as an independent on most state ballots, while former Democratic Congresswoman and prominent African American leader Cynthia McKinney will represent the Green Party on dozens of state ballots.

Their candidacies point to an easily correctable flaw in our elections: we don't require candidates to win with a majority of the vote. Instead, states typically use "plurality voting" that allows the candidate with the most votes to take office even if opposed by a majority. Plurality voting makes it far harder to hold leaders accountable - and fails to accommodate voters having more choices. It means that every Member of Congress can win re-election even if strongly opposed by most voters, and every state this fall will awards its presidential electoral votes to candidates that most voters might have opposed.

In contrast, majority voting is the international norm for presidential elections. Most nations use two-round systems, with a runoff between the top two candidates if no candidate wins a majority of the first-round vote. Ireland uses instant runoff voting that simulates a runoff process in one trip to the polls by allowing voters to rank candidates in order of choice: first, second and third.

Plurality voting works fine when elections have only two choices. But it goes haywire when more candidates run - witness the hand-wringing over Ross Perot in 1992 and Ralph Nader in 2000.

We can expect more hand-wringing this year. In a recent Rasmussen Research poll, fully 10% of likely voters said they would vote for Bob Barr or Ralph Nader if matched against Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama. Republicans are fearful that Barr will split the majority vote in his home state of Georgia and close states like Nevada, while Nader and Cynthia McKinney together easily could split Democratic majorities.

Already some partisans are decrying their candidacies, but the fact is that most Americans prefer to have voter choice. They like voter participation. They want candidates to raise tough issues. They're fans of democracy, and choice, participation and vigorous debate are rather important conditions of it. We should welcome more perspectives and more opportunities to hold major party nominees accountable.

Intriguingly, two innovators willing to advance beyond plurality voting happen to be John McCain and Barack Obama. Obama was the lead sponsor of Illinois legislation to establish instant runoff voting for certain state elections, while McCain made a ringing endorsement of its adoption for state and federal elections in a 2002 ballot measure in Alaska. Not only that - Nader, Barr and McKinney also all have been outspoken advocates of instant runoff voting.

They can take comfort that their bold stance keeps demonstrating gaining popular support. Exit poll surveys in cities implementing IRV show strong voter enthusiasm, and it has won by landslide margins in a series of ballot measures in jurisdictions like Oakland (CA), Minneapolis (MN), Sarasota (FL), Santa Fe (NM) and Pierce County (WA).

Our elected leaders can't have it both ways. If they don't like "spoilers", they can adopt instant runoff voting or runoff elections by mere statute. If not, they must live with the consequences. I know which decision most Americans want them to make.

FairVote is a non-profit, non-partisan organization devoted to electoral reforms that respect every vote and ever voice. Signature proposals we have developed or advanced include proportional voting, instant runoff voting, ranked choice voting, the (more...)
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Democracy Lost: the Iowa Caucus, the New Hampshire Primary, and the Shortchanging of American Presidential Politics

Let's End Gerrymandering with Fair Voting for Congress

John Gideon, R.I.P. - and the "Gideon Initiative" for citizenship ownership of our elections

Was the Iowa Caucuses' Real Winner Not in the Race?

Clearing the Barr to a majority president with instant runoff voting


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 15 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Clay likes to throw around "lies" and &q... by Rob Richie on Friday, Aug 15, 2008 at 7:38:08 PM
Just the facts.Don't patronize me, just give u... by Joyce McCloy on Friday, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:38:05 PM
IRV is now official policy in Minneapolis and St P... by Michael Cavlan on Friday, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:14:37 PM
Why do you think Greens support IRV? I mean, ... by Clay Shentrup on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:14:44 AM
Joyce -- We know what what you're about: fight... by Rob Richie on Friday, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:23:39 PM
Call some Australian Greens and other third partie... by Clay Shentrup on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 2:17:22 AM
I haven't looked into the matter closely enoug... by JC Garrett on Friday, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:20:00 PM
JC Garrett,I completely agree that you cannot call... by Clay Shentrup on Friday, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:56:38 PM
Rob,The claim in Science magazine that when using ... by Clay Shentrup on Friday, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:51:45 PM
Clay, Just glanced at this and am not going t... by Rob Richie on Friday, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:16:01 PM
Rob, The Science magazine claim was that "a v... by Clay Shentrup on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:11:11 AM
Briefly. Rob Richie and FairVote offer good resear... by Terry Bouricius on Monday, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:45:51 AM
doesn't realize he is part of the problem and does... by Stanimal on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 1:31:16 AM
Some time ago I was compelled to seriously examine... by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 9:28:45 AM
Well, I will tell you that I have studied FairVote... by Clay Shentrup on Saturday, Aug 16, 2008 at 2:18:53 PM