OpEdNews Op Eds

Chris Matthew's Ironic Sexism

      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 1/16/09

Author 3066
Become a Fan
  (8 fans)
- Advertisement -

During a discussion of the economy following Barack Obama’s speech on Thursday, January 8th, Chris Matthews made an amazing joke. His guest was discussing the concept of the  velocity of money - how quickly dollars change hands - and Matthews suggested that husbands should pay their wives for cooking dinner, to "move the money around."

The assumption that husbands can take their wives' unpaid work for granted, is stunning. The joke is also telling, in its recognition that such work would have value, were it not performed by women for their husbands.  

It's a testament to how far we haven't come: 45 years after The Feminine Mystique, this unpaid obligation is so easily assumed. To me, it exposes a fault line I see between truly radical feminism, and the liberal feminism that has become mainstream.

Liberal feminism focuses on opportunities for women in the public sphere, especially the workplace. Success is defined as greater numbers of women achieving professional, wage-earning status. The result has been a "second shift" when these women come home.

Radical feminists have long dared to speak the unspeakable - that perhaps the work that women do should be recognized as work, and compensated in some way. To them, Matthews' statement is not funny.

The work of Selma James, who started a "Wages for Housework" campaign, dared to ask the question that has the potential to unite both sides of the "Mommy Wars." That is: are women really liberated by greater access to the paid workforce, if their unpaid contributions to the economy are unrecognized and taken for granted? James talks about the "myth of liberation through work."

Key to this question, is overcoming the common perception that work done inside the home is "private," and not relevant to the community.

Later feminists have added to James perspective; e.g., Marilyn Waring, a feminist economist, has spent decades trying to get the UN to recognize the majority of the world's work that is done by women, as contributing to the world's economies.

- Advertisement -

Catharine MacKinnon, a feminist legal scholar , points out the problems with the legal definition of "equality." In her "difference vs. dominance" concept, MacKinnon explains that the law only promises equality of treatment when men and women find themselves in equal circumstances. Since men never confront pregnancy, breast-feeding, and the child care issues these conditions imply, equality can often become an empty promise.

Ann Crittenden has pointed out that how our culture pays lip service to motherhood being crucial, while assigning almost no value to the actual work of raising children.

And finally, Martha Fineman writes about the 'myth of autonomy." In short, she argues that we arbitarily assign the label "dependency"  to say, welfare mothers, when "we all live subsidized lives." Working husbands are dependent on their wives' household and child-care tasks in order to do their workplace jobs; co-workers are dependent upon each other's child care arrangements - whether paid or unpaid - as well.

The work of these feminists sheds a different light on Chris Matthews sex-stereotyping comment: Yes, Chris, the unpaid work of wives and mothers does contribute to the economy. Perhaps it's time we started acting like it.

President-Elect Obama is well know for stressing two popular values: 1) the “dignity of work”; and 2) the importance of responsible parenting. The former is often taken to foreshadow Obama’s intention to follow in Bill Clinton’s footsteps, aggressively moving recipients off the welfare rolls - as his ad which uses the phrases alludes to. Taken literally, the latter is an absolute crucial contribution to society - but, not being “work,” it falls short of providing “dignity.”

- Advertisement -

I hope Obama decides not to take the road President Clinton took, asking parents to sacrifice parenting in order to achieve "dignity." We need to re-structure our economy, to take into account the work that subsidizes us all.  



Amy Fried is the author of "Escaping Dick Cheney's Stomach." She received her Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior, and has been an advocate for church-state separation and other civil liberties issues. She writes on women's issues, media, veganism (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Erectile Dysfunction Ads Say About Our Culture and Our Health

What Makes a Good Leader?

Why Disability is a Feminist Issue

Confessions of a Junk Food Vegan

Old Enough to be Raped

What Part of "Emergency" Don't You Understand?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

of the typical husband/wife relationship. There ar... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:20:40 AM
I think you misread my article. The idea that the ... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Saturday, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:28:43 AM
If a woman should get paid for doing house work fo... by roy lutz on Saturday, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:49:01 PM
Oy, where to begin? Let me ask you this: What is t... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Saturday, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:05:15 PM
I admit, I was being facetious about payment for m... by roy lutz on Saturday, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:12:02 PM
I have several reponses to your notion that it'... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Sunday, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:54:30 AM
You apparently have a "Central Planning Commi... by roy lutz on Monday, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:31:04 AM
We already have central planning for all sorts of ... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Monday, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:01:57 AM
Amy, I'm trying very hard to find some common ... by roy lutz on Monday, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:33:19 PM
Another advocate of this theme is Riane Eisler in ... by Rady Ananda on Saturday, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:51:26 PM