Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

China vs US "Sea-to-Shining-Sea"

      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 12/18/13

Author 73066
Become a Fan
  (143 fans)
- Advertisement -
Source: Asia Times


The rise of China as an economic superpower was the most read news story of the past decade, surpassing the Iraq War and the attacks of Sept. 11
(image by REUTERS/STRINGER/FILES)
  DMCA

It happened now and it will happen again: a near-collision between an American and a Chinese naval vessel in the South China Sea. 

The USS Cowpens, a 10,000-ton guided-missile cruiser, got "too close" to a drill involving the Liaoning, China's first aircraft carrier, and its carrier task force, according to the Global Times. 

The US Pacific Fleet stressed that the cruiser had to take emergency measures to avoid a collision. Yet the Global Times accused the cruiser of "harassing" the Liaoning formation by taking "offensive actions."  

The paper spelt it loudly; "If the American navy and air force always encroach near China's doorstep, confrontation is bound to take place."  

Finally, China's Defense Ministry intervened to clarify that the vessels had "met" each other in the South China Sea but the worst was avoided via "effective and normal communication."  
- Advertisement -


Communication had better be damned "effective" from now on as China asserts itself as a rising sea power and it's obviously unclear who can really do what in the South as well as the East China Sea, not to mention the oceans beyond. 

It's a fact that China's still booming economy is directly dependent on its complex maritime lines of supply (and demand) -- mostly over the Indian Ocean and the Western Pacific. But that does not mean that China is trying to control its surrounding seas by imposing a sino-version of the 19th century Monroe Doctrine, which was essentially a continental strategy of hemispheric domination (ask any informed Latin American about it). 

Beijing is indeed increasing maritime patrols in the South and East China Sea. There have been some scuffles, mostly rhetorical, with, for instance, the Philippines. And as Beijing decided to create its new air defense identification zone (ADIZ), commercial airlines -- not inclined to jeopardize their insurance arrangements -- are all filing their flight plans with Beijing, which means they acknowledge China's right and authority. 

Let's say China is now in the stage of creating facts on the sea. For the moment, a kind of uneasy accommodation seems to prevail involving the Americans and also the Japanese. Beijing knows that the US Navy and the Japanese navy have better training -- and more experience -- than the Chinese navy. Once again, for now. 

Slouching across the Rimland

This is a pretty decent summary in the South China Morning Post of the recent growth of China's naval power in the context of a speech given by then president Hu Jintao last November "against the backdrop of US President Barack Obama's 'pivot to Asia'." 
- Advertisement -


It does connect a few dots between the new mantra coined by President Xi Jinping -- the "Chinese dream" -- and the rise of China as a maritime power. 

But there's way much more to it. There's no question Chinese strategists have stripped Obama's "pivot" upside down, and that means furiously brushing up on their Mahan, as in US Navy captain Alfred Mahan, and specifically The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, published in 1890. 

Yes, it's always about a "pivot." Mahan believed that the geographical pivot of empires was not the Heartland of Eurasia -- as with Mackinder -- but the Indian and Pacific oceans. For Mahan, whoever controlled these oceans would be able to project power all around the Eurasian Rimland, and also affect the "Heartland," deep in Central Asia. The Chinese know how this has translated into the US Navy being able to become a factor in Eurasia -- part of that "sea-to-shining-sea" domination enshrined in Manifest Destiny. 

Our strategists in Beijing are very much aware of how China -- as a state and even more as a civilization -- extends from the Heartland to the warm waters of the Pacific Rim. They are also aware of an absolutely crucial text, A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Sea Power, published by the US Navy in 2007. This is essentially the blueprint for Obama's pivot, based -- in theory -- on cooperation with local navies (Australia, Singapore, Philippines) rather than dominance. (Incidentally, the navy advertizes to whomever is concerned that "sea power protects the American way of life.") 

Inevitably, our Chinese strategists also brushed up on their Spykman, as in Dutchman Nicholas Spykman, who founded the Institute of International Studies at Yale in 1935. It was Spykman who conceptualized South Asia, Southeast Asia, China and Japan, as well as the Middle East, as part of the Rimland, which for him was the key to world power (not the Heartland). 

And it's also here that we see how what a sea power like the US calls "containment" is interpreted by a Heartland power like China (not to mention Russia) as "encirclement."  

It's also easy for Westerners to forget how China was once a formidable sea power, at the apex in the 15th century, via the exceptionally gifted Admiral Zheng He, commanding an extensive fleet of often remarkably large ships under the Ming emperors. 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Yes, the Heartland versus the Rimland. Like Yin an... by Charles Roll on Wednesday, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:05:49 PM
Schizoaffective more like it. As to whether that's... by paulvcassidy on Wednesday, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:24:57 PM
Wow, Cassidy, what a great sentence! I mean this: ... by Charles Roll on Friday, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:39:52 PM
There's always a precedent! It's submarine warfare... by Charles Roll on Friday, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:51:49 PM
"For the Chinese the sensible stance is submissive... by Charles Roll on Friday, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:48:07 PM
My Comment: "Schizoaffective more like it. As to ... by paulvcassidy on Wednesday, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:28:27 PM
Ah ha! You've gone Twitter on us! Awesome. ... by Charles Roll on Friday, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:41:35 PM
'... effective and normal communication' is, indee... by mhenriday on Thursday, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:09:04 AM