Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   18 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Character flaws and circumstances in America's deadly warriors-in-chief

      (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 11/13/12

Author 68236
Become a Fan
  (13 fans)
- Advertisement -


                                 America's presidents choose war

                                 Then watch it from afar

                                 Blood starts flowing 

                                 Body count starts growing

You may rightly ask after reading this article what earthly good will come of having written it? To be truthful, I don't rightly know; maybe nothing, maybe something. We live in a culture that accepts and even expects war. That must change or war will eventually annihilate humanity. To do nothing, to write nothing therefore is unacceptable to me. I like to think that seeking a better understanding of the chief warrior's deadly habit may be necessary before stopping the habit. 

My favorite American historian, the late Howard Zinn wrote the book, "A people's history of the United States."[1] An alternate title for this article could be "A pacifist's history of U.S. warriors-in-chief." I'm one of those "peaceniks" that dangerous patriots ("my country right or wrong") love to disparage. I hated compulsory RTC in college eons ago. I've never owned or shot a gun. And, to borrow a warrior's phrase, "I take no prisoners in arguments with "warnicks." All this is to say that try as I might to be objective this article may be biased. You decide. 

I'm going to examine very briefly five issues concerning our warrior presidents and war itself. First, how many military interventions have our presidents initiated and what has been the grave count from those interventions? Second, why have our presidents been so willing to send knowingly, countless people to their graves? Third, if war is murder and since US presidents do not go into battle themselves are they surrogate murders? Fourth, is any war "just?" Fifth, can America's endless wars be ended for good?

- Advertisement -

How many "grave" choices have U.S. presidents made?

Counting declared wars and other military interventions is difficult even in the Internet age where nothing seems to go untracked and unreported, but it is impossible to get any reliable estimate of total "grave" count from those interventions. Only cemetery keepers keep reliable tabs of their own plots. So my overall impression will have to do and it's really all I need to do since one death by force is one too many. 

Military interventions were launched throughout a sizeable part of the world over 300 times by 43 of our 44 presidents. President Benjamin Harrison didn't have time or strength to flex his muscles, dying from an illness after being in office only 32 days. The death toll of Americans alone from all those interventions amounts to over two million. Between six and seven million civilians died from U.S military intervention in Korea, Vietnam, and Iraq. A former CIA agent has estimated that six million people have died from covert CIA operations alone. [2]

Why do U.S. presidents make those choices?

To understand why anyone, presidents included, do what they do requires acknowledging their gender and knowing their character and their circumstances. As an organizational psychologist turned political psychologist in retirement I am going to tell you what I have concluded from decades of studying leadership. It's been leadership outside the Oval Office, but I think what I have learned can be generalized to it. What influences CEOs and presidents alike is more similar than different.

- Advertisement -


Need more be said? In the corporate world males sit atop the glass ceiling. Atop the political world is always a male warrior-in-chief. Wars throughout history have been started and fought by males with very few exceptions (Cleopatra and Margaret Thatcher, for example). America has always been a male dominated and aggressive society. While testosterone may play a tiny role in a president's aggression, it is to other personal characteristics and their circumstances we must look for primary explanations.


Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4


I am a retired (1995)organizational psychologist who has since concentrated on the subjects of the collusion between government and corporations and matters of war and peace. I have just finished writing my final book (final because I am staring (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

America's Corpocracy: The Legacy of U.S. Supreme Court Justice, Lewis F. Powell (1907-1998)

Robed Injustice

America needs a socially responsible capitalism

Tyranny's Hush Money

The Militarization of American Education

Stop Warfare, Not Medicare: A Pathetic Personal Experience but Still Undaunted


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
6 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Do you know how many people have been killed by U... by Gary Brumback on Tuesday, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:06:19 PM
"But to refute the claim made by many authorities ... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:30:41 AM
Thank you for your comments even though I disagree... by Gary Brumback on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:06:20 AM
But logic is not violated by the fact that, if I w... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:01:51 PM
"Slavery probably would have ended peacefully with... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:30:59 AM
I appreciate the fact that you did not call me a r... by Gary Brumback on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:20:52 AM
Lincoln and others had a moral obligation to act a... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:56:15 PM
Yes, I am idealistic but I don't neglect the "sad ... by Gary Brumback on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:00:16 PM
Kill the poor.  War for supremacy - or just f... by Don Caldarazzo on Tuesday, Nov 13, 2012 at 7:08:00 PM
Well thought out and well-reasoned summation of ou... by Arlen Grossman on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:39:42 PM
Since 1947(end of WW2) Glorious USA bombed more th... by jean labrek on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:39:27 PM
Thanks for your reply to Arlen, Jean. You refer to... by Gary Brumback on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:54:57 PM
Read more at - - and - webo... by jean labrek on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:04:41 PM
Thanks Jean, I'll look into those references.BestG... by Gary Brumback on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:33:46 PM
"Their agent"?... by BFalcon on Thursday, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:25:11 AM
Thanks very much Arlen for your compliment. I... by Gary Brumback on Wednesday, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:13:48 PM
for our aggression, heroes and villains aside, is ... by molly cruz on Thursday, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:55:32 AM
Nicely put Molly. You covered the matter from the ... by Gary Brumback on Thursday, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:24:37 PM