Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 6 (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Can you yell OUTRAGEOUS?

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   News 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (11 fans)

Max Baucus’ Senate Finance Committee released the “draft proposal” of its version of a healthcare reform bill. NOT in the proposal was the “government option” sought by President Obama and the country’s progressives. The progressives had long argued that the most cost-effective way to bring comprehensive medical care to all Americans was a “single-payer’ plan.

Republicans claimed that, regardless of whatever other reforms they might support, even if unenthusiastically, a “government option” component would condemn any package and garner solid GOP opposition. Solid Republican opposition has been from the start something the White House wanted at all costs to avoid. What it wanted, at all costs, was a plan that could genuinely be labeled as bi-partisan.

But the kick to the groin that was delivered today by at least 10 Democratic senators, according to the Washington Post, was their rationale: “It would be unfair to private insurers.”  While I don’t have the full list of the 10, here are the names of seven I know of: Max Baucus (MT), Ben Nelson (NE), Ron Wyden (OR), Mark Pryor and Blanche Lincoln (AR), Mary Landrieu (LA), and Tom Carper (DE).

Now that you have their names, I’m going to repeat what they said was the reason they eliminated a “government option,” but I’m going to repeat it in huge bold font.

It would be unfair to private insurers.

Ed Tubbs   


An "Old Army Vet" and liberal, qua liberal, with a passion for open inquiry in a neverending quest for truth unpoisoned by religious superstitions. Per Voltaire: "He who can lead you to believe an absurdity can lead you to commit an atrocity."

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Texas Board of Education: America's Taliban.

Refusing The Call; Will selfish Seniors hand over the USA's future to China?

Merry Christmas-- Ho, Ho, Ho What the Hell

Today's McCarthyism. Will we Stand up Against it, or Stand Down?

ANYone who would vote for Sarah Palin is not an American

"The horror, the horror" -- Health Insurance CEOs Testify in Congress


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

and perhaps the Obama plan public options, might w... by Jack Harrington on Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 2:05:24 PM
Aaaaaaaarrrrrrgh!  Well, at least we know who... by Bryan Emmel on Monday, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:20:02 AM
Unfortunately, these traitorous, lowlife charlatan... by Raphael Sidelman on Friday, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:08:22 PM