Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 8/24/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (5 comments)

Calls for Boycott of Abercrombie & Fitch

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By Andrea Defusco-Sullivan  Posted by Sherwood Ross (about the submitter)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (31 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com


Prospective buyers of Abercrombie & Fitch clothes should boycott the chain until it decides to market its clothing to everyone, no matter what their color, creed or lifestyle.


The retailer's offer to pay cast members of the popular hit " Jersey Shore " TV series not to wear A&F brand clothing is discriminatory as the series is centered on the lives of Italian-Americans living in New Jersey .


A&F's public relations gurus said the TV series is "contrary to the aspirational (sic) nature of the brand." We all know that it's okay to bash Italian-Americans...because we see it in the media everyday, except that it isn't okay because bias is bias...even against good-natured, tan young people with vowels at the ends of their names.

Just imagine if the cast members were African- or Asian-American, or if A&F said something like "Your hallal lifestyle is contrary to the aspirational (sic) nature of the brand."

A&F reportedly offered actor Michael "The Situation" Sorrentino "a substantial payment" not to wear its clothes as doing so "could cause significant damage" to the brand.


" Jersey Shore " host MTV dismissed A&F's offer as "a clever PR stunt" and it has been noted the retailer in the past has sold T-shirts reading "G.T.L.", said to refer to " Jersey Shore 's" pre-party routine of "gym, tan, laundry."


The " Jersey Shore " flap is not the first involving A&F's publicity practices. In 2003 it was accused by Citizens Against Pornography, a St. Louis, Mo., group, of selling "soft porn" catalogues in its stores marked "for adults only." "They (the models) have no clothes at all---their genitals are covered but they are nude," one of the complainants said. "We don't feel retail stores should use that form of advertising."

                                 #

(Professor Defusco-Sullivan teaches writing at the new American College of History and Legal Studies, in Salem, N.H.)

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

really? by sbaker on Thursday, Aug 25, 2011 at 8:39:31 AM
A PR Stunt by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Thursday, Aug 25, 2011 at 8:49:15 PM
Some folks by Laura Roberts on Thursday, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:25:04 PM
Wow by Mark Colwell on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:50:37 AM
Exactly by Laura Roberts on Friday, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:04:18 PM