Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
June 12, 2008 at 20:55:45

View Ratings | Rate It

California Suit Against Whole Foods for Carcinogen in Body Care Products

by Ronnie Cummins, Founder, Organic Consumers Association (Posted by Stephen Fox)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

California Files Lawsuit Against Whole Foods, Avalon, and Others Whose Products Tested Positive for Carcinogenic 1,4-Dioxane in OCA Study
  • Organic Consumers Association, 6/10/2008 
  • Details are here: http://www.prlog.org/10079593-california-lawsuit-whole-foods-avalon-and-others-with-products-containing-carcinogenic-1-4-dioxane.html
  • OAKLAND, CA - Reacting in part to a study released by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) in March of this year, but also based on their own testing, the Attorney General of California has filed a major lawsuit against body care household-cleaning product companies whose products recently tested highest for the carcinogenic contaminant 1,4-Dioxane.   

    Under California's "Proposition 65" consumer products that contain toxic levels of 1,4 Dioxane must have warning labels stating they may cause cancer.  1,4-Dioxane is typically produced as a byproduct when ingredients are ethoxylated with the petrochemical ethylene oxide, a process which has become standard practice for many cleansing and moisturizing products.  

    The suit, California v. Avalon Natural Products (manufacturer of the Alba brand), also names Whole Foods Market California (manufacturer of the Whole Foods 365 brand), Beaumont Products (manufacturer of the Citrus Magic brand), and Nutribiotic (read full Attorney General suit here). It is unclear exactly which products manufactured by the aforementioned companies triggered the lawsuit, but all named companies have sold products that tested close to or in excess of 20 parts per million for 1,4-Dioxane in the OCA study released at the Natural Products Expo in Anaheim, CA in March (read study results here).

    Last week OCA sent a letter to the four companies named in the California lawsuit to see if they are planning changes to their labeling or product formulations.  Only one company responded.  In a letter to the OCA, Beaumont Products wrote, "Upon being notified that there was a problem with our product, we verified that the problem existed, then took immediate action." Beaumont has reformulated their products to remove the problematic ingredient, highlighting their dedication to providing safe products, in contrast to the lack of action taken by the other three companies. http://www.organicconsumers.org/bodycare/beaumont.doc)


    The California Attorney General (AG) alleges these companies should have put warning labels on products containing high levels of 1,4-Dioxane, stating that they may cause cancer. The lawsuit states, "Plaintiff alleges that  each defendant has known since at least May 29, 2004 that the body washes and gels and liquid dish soaps contain, 1,4-dioxane and that persons using these products are exposed to 1,4-dioxane."  Per Proposition 65, fines for mislabeled products are as high as $2,500 per day for each violation.  FAQs about 1,4-Dioxane can be found here.

    "These companies need to stop treating the inclusion of cancer causing chemicals in their products as 'business as usual' and reformulate before consumer confidence in the natural products and organics industry is permanently damaged," says consumer activist David Steinman who conducted the OCA study and originally exposed the presence of 1,4-Dioxane in baby bubble bath products in his book Safe Trip to Eden and in a February, 2007 press conference with the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. (The press release can be found here .)

    The AG's complaint  states that California wants, "…preliminary injunctions, permanent injunctions, or other orders prohibiting the defendant(s) from exposing persons within the State of California to 1,4-dioxane without providing clear and reasonable warnings…"

    "The OCA's 1,4-dioxane study elevated the issue of fake 'natural' and 'organic' brands that utilize petrochemicals in their formulas in March, and now we are seeing labeling enforcement on a scale never seen before," says OCA National Director Ronnie Cummins. "We used an independent laboratory and found that numerous 'natural' and 'organic' brands tested positive for 1,4-Dioxane, a cancer causing contaminant resulting from the petrochemical ethylene oxide being attached to one or more ingredients."

    For immediate release: Interviews with David Steinman or Ronnie Cummins can be arranged by contacting Adam Eidinger at 202-744-2671.

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Book Recommendations for "CHILDRENS HEALTH CARE California"
California Child Care Health and Safety Training Program (Participant Handbook)(
by American Red Cross

$20.00

Number of pages:
Publisher: The American National Red Cross

American Red Cross California Child Care Health and Safety Training Program
by American Red Cross

$23.00

Number of pages:
Publisher: American National Red Cross

Medical care resources and utilization among low-income families with dependent children, (California. Office of Health Care Services. Medical Care Resources and Utilization Research Project. Report)
by Ralph Wood


Number of pages: 62
Publisher: Office of Health Care Services

Improving access to health care for California children
by Peter Hansel


Number of pages:
Publisher: Senate Office of Research

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments


Wild Oats, Whole Foods & This Organic Shopper

For several years I drove 22 miles ONE WAY to get to the nearest Wild Oats store, scheduling my trip to include other stops in that area so I could get the most bang for my gasoline buck.  When I heard they were changing to Whole Foods, I got a sinking feeling in my stomach, mostly because past experiences have shown me that changes such as this are seldom good.  I tried to keep an open mind and continued to shop there for a couple of months after the conversion to Whole Foods, but it didn't take long before I sensed my sinking feeling was justified. 
   The store is not as clean as it once was, many items I could only get at Wild Oats are no longer stocked, I don't recognize any of the employees anymore, and the personnel who do work there are not as knowledgeable as their predecessors.  One of the things I liked best about Wild Oats was their Wooden Nickel program wherein if I brought my own shopping bags I got to put wooden nickels into a box for a charity of my choice.  I don't know where this donation goes now and when I've asked, the employees don't seem to know either.
   Until I read the article in the Indianapolis Sustainable Food Alliance eNewsletter, I was not aware of the political goings-on about this merger; I only knew I didn't like the change as a consumer. My monthly trip to Wild Oats/Whole Foods usually amounted to about $200 and while I'm aware this amount will not make a dent in their bottom line, I am now boycotting all future trips to that store. I also plan to write the company to inform them of my opinion.  Thankfully, other grocery stores in the area are finally starting to catch on to organic foods so I will be able to eat, and if they don't carry items I used to get at WO/WF, then I will do without.
   In my opinion, Mr. Steinman said it best: "These companies need to stop treating the inclusion of cancer causing chemicals in their products as 'business as usual' and reformulate before consumer confidence in the natural products and organics industry is permanently damaged."  And KUDOS to Beaumont Products for taking responsibility...and Action! I 'bout fell off my chair since we live in a time when "I can't recall" and "We didn't know" seem to be typical PR fodder.
   I'm not sure product makers understand the mentality of an organic shopper - I believe we are different than what the product and marketing  companies are used to.  For example, the local Meijer stores are really beefing up the organic product selection, but they don't seem to understand that this consumer (and I believe most organic consumers) don't want organic items mingled on the shelves with other choices. Personally, I'd much rather see a section of the store devoted exclusively to organic products so I can walk in, get my shopping done, and get out.  I believe they think that by mixing them in with other items we might be inclined to choose the name brand that's on sale rather than the organic, or if I'm looking for organic canned peaches in the canned food aisle and don't find them, that I'll choose another brand instead.  I don't think they realize that for the most part, if no organic item is available, most of us would do without or try another store...or maybe that's just me.

by Kerry D (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Saturday, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:00:56 AM

Recommend  (0+)

REACTION TO WHOLE FOODS BEING SUED BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Whole Foods has a massive quality control issue that they must address, and not just mask under their 365 label. Their label must mean something in terms of quality, purity, and value. Right now, this 365/lawsuit by the State of California under its cancer prevention statutes withing Proposition 65 means that Whole Foods has an enormous quality control issue. What baffles me is that these tests were done about 4 years ago, so why didn't Whole Foods quit adding the carcinogens and reformulate their products accordingly? This can only have resulted from their corporate hubris.

As a consumer protectionist, it is really clear to me that Whole Foods customers and former customers who are concerned about avoiding cancer from their products, should take ALL of them back to Whole Foods and ask politely for a full refund. before they stop shopping there altogether.

The fines inherent in Proposition 65 are each at an amount of $2500 per day, so maybe the rosy duplicitous picture put forth by Whole Foods is getting a little cloud?

I personally plan to stop shopping there, henceforth, and probably permanently! If I owned Whole Foods stock, I would be dumping it....This whole deal is starting to remind me of the mess which Erin Brockovich unraveled, the asbestos suits, and the civil rights cases in the 60's. Jerry Brown is certainly on the right track, especially if other Attorneys General were to join in this effort. New Mexico's AG has a Ph. D. in Chemistry; perhaps he will examine Jerry Brown's efforts in that light.

Richard Blumenthal of Connecticutt is the kind of AG who might want to move in that direction....Don't forget also that Governor Christine O. Gregoire of Washington state was one of the AG's who participated back in the 90's in the Tobacco suits, which resulted in billions of dollars of judgments.

JUST HOW DIFFERENT IS WHOLE FOODS IN THIS INSTANCE FROM THE TOBACCO CORPORATIONS?

Truly,

Eliot Gould

by Eliot Gould (16 articles, 0 quicklinks, 28 diaries, 200 comments [3 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2008 at 6:20:34 PM

Recommend  (0+)

reply to Gould comment

Well said. As an investor, I would be curious about and interested in Mike Gilliland's Sunflower/Farmer's Markets, a new chain welcomed in the West; Gilliland was the Boulder, Colorado Founder of Wild Oats, and I can't recall any scandal or ethical broach that EVER  came out during his 20 year tenure there.

by Eliot Gould (16 articles, 0 quicklinks, 28 diaries, 200 comments [3 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2008 at 6:43:48 PM

Recommend  (0+)

author's answer to both comments

First, K. Davis: welcome to Op Ed News! I see this was your first comment ever. You make valid points, and I think that Indiana's stores' shifts in policy are much like those in other states.

I am glad that Beaumont showed the wisdom to switch formats as soon as all of this came out, but from what I understand, these tests proving carcinogenicity were done 3-4 years ago, so have WF and the others kept the same compound/formatting in making their soaps, entirely knowing about the effects of those chemicals for the past four years?

Gould makes some good points too.

Stephen Fox

by Stephen Fox (96 articles, 3 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 802 comments [33 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Tuesday, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:10:31 PM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

Hypocritical Repugnicans Owe WJ Clinton an Apology by David Gray

Dept. of State Spokesman Addresses McKinney's Capture by Meryl Ann Butler

Torture on the 4th of July by Lawrence Gist

Our Nation has a Great Deal to Learn from Phillip Butler about Morality, Law, and Torture by Lawrence Gist

A Not-So-Glorious Fourth Posted by Josh Mitteldorf

Capricorn Full Moon Eclipse 2009 by Cathy Lynn Pagano

Obama and "Pre-Emptive Capitulation" as a Modality of Democratic Governance by Herbert Calhoun

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum