Reprinted from Empire Burlesque
Andy Worthington asks a burning question: "Why is Shaker Aamer still at Gitmo?" And after detailing the case of Aamer -- an innocent man sold to the American security forces by the human traffickers who partnered with the CIA in Afghanistan, a man who was cleared for release from the American concentration camp seven years ago -- Worthington suggests the likely answer:
Aamer knows too much about the torture regime at Gitmo, and has been too vocal in standing up for fellow prisoners throughout his illegal captivity -- and has made it clear he will continue to speak out against the inhumane conditions in the camp.Worthington's piece should be read in full, but here are a few excerpts:
"Imagine being imprisoned, year after year, despite having been told that your captors had undertaken a high-level review process and no longer wanted to hold you?- Advertisement -
"At the United States' detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, Shaker Aamer, the last British resident in the prison, is facing just that situation. More than seven years ago, the George W. Bush administration approved Aamer for release from the detention facility. Five years ago, the high-level interagency Guantanamo Review Task Force, appointed by President Barack Obama when he took office, also approved him for release (PDF) and told him he would be freed, along with 125 others, once the necessary arrangements were made."
When releasing its illegal captives, the United States insists that its victims' home countries (or some other country) will be willing to take them. As Worthington notes, for seven years, the British government has been calling for Aamer to be returned to the UK, his home country. Thus even by the perverted rules of the American concentration camp system, there should be no bar to Aamer's released. He's been cleared by the Bush administration; he's been cleared by the Obama administration; his home country stands ready to welcome him, and has continually called for his release. So why he is still be held captive? Worthington writes:
"We know that Aamer has been an eloquent defender of prisoners' rights from the moment he was handed over to the U.S. by bounty hunters in Afghanistan, where he had traveled with his family to provide humanitarian aid. We know that he has been a leader in the prison, because of his outspoken criticism of conditions at Guantanamo, and has tales of torture and abuse to share with the world.
"Perhaps this fear of embarrassment is the only thing preventing the United States from ending Aamer's 13-year imprisonment and allowing him to rejoin his wife and children in Britain."
A man sold into captivity by crooks working with spies to facilitate the vast, endless expansion of America's imperial war state (a plan laid out years ago by some of the top leaders of the American elite, as we have noted here so often before): this is the reality of the American state. This is what we are now, this is what we do. Yet people still get exercised, on both left and right, over the question of which bloodstained murderer will preside over this slaughterhouse of human values for the next four years. They still think this is the democracy they were taught about in school. They still think that if we can just get the right peachy-keen person in charge of this world-ravaging war machine, then all will be well. I confess that I can no longer fathom such wilful blindness to reality, such utter moral idiocy.