Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   No comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News

CA Supreme Court to Issue Prop 8 Ruling on Tuesday

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

News 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 5/22/09

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)



On Tuesday, the California Supreme Court will issue its ruling on the case questioning the validity of Proposition 8, a voter-based initiative that denies equal treatment under the law to homosexuals in the realm of civil marriage.


Pictured on top row, from left to right are Associate Justices Kathryn Mickle Werdegar, Carlos R. Moreno, Joyce L. Kennard, and Marvin R. Baxter. On bottom from left to right: Associate Justice Ming W. Chin, Chief Justice Ronald M. George, and Associate Justice Carol A. Corrigan.

In the consolidated case, Strauss v Horton, the court directed the parties to brief and argue the following issues:

(1) Is Proposition 8 invalid because it constitutes a revision of, rather than an amendment to, the California Constitution? (See Cal. Const., art. XVIII, sections 1-4.)

In considering this, the Q community regards Proposition 8 a revision, rather than an amendment to the California Constitution.



(2) Does Proposition 8 violate the separation of powers doctrine under the California Constitution?

This question been long settled per this 1943 Supreme Court case where Justice Robert  Jackson dissented (though this is now the law):

"The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections." (emphasis added)

Justice Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954), U. S. Supreme Court Justice Source: West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943).
As to the third question:

If Proposition 8 is not unconstitutional, what is its effect, if any, on the marriages of same-sex couples performed before the adoption of Proposition 8?

Retired California civil rights attorney, John Mortimer, doesn’t believe Proposition 8 will be found Constitutional. But if it is, he told me:

“Those marriages remain valid because they were valid as per a Supreme Court ruling before the Constitution was revised. Retroactive application is a very complicated legal issue, but I feel sure it would not apply here.

“If the court were to allow Prop 8 to stand the court commits suicide. It would mean that the court puts a bullet to its own head in that a tyrannous majority could always be able simply finance a voter initiative to rally the angry ignorant villagers with pitch forks. It would be the end of an independent judiciary as we know it in California.”

The states of Iowa, Vermont, Massachusetts, and Connecticut recognize same sex marriage for its citizens.

A national Day of Decision action is being organized in anticipation of Tuesday's decision.  State organizers plan to protest or celebrate within twenty-four hours of the decision being published.

 

In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Initially focused on elections, she investigated the 2004 Ohio election, organizing, training and leading several forays into counties to photograph the 2004 ballots. She officially served at three recounts, including the 2004 recount. She also organized and led the team that audited Franklin County Ohio's 2006 election, proving the number of voter signatures did not match official results. Her work appears in three books.

Her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a researcher or investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor.

She graduated from The Ohio State University's School of Agriculture in December 2003 with a B.S. in Natural Resources.

All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Tell the truth anyway.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum