Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Inspiring 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 9/27/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (14 comments)

Busting the Fraud of Voter Fraud

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

In response to the September 21 NPR Morning Edition Sunday's Report on Voter Fraud in Wisconsin:

YOU NEED TO KNOW:

There is a major difference between Election Fraud and Voter Fraud.

Election Fraud is a broad term for the manipulation of election results--away from the choice of the majority of eligible voters.

Voter Fraud is the term for voting and/or registering to vote by people ineligible to vote, such as non-citizens, non-residents, those with fictional identification, and, in some states, felons.

Election Fraud can alter the vote tally by tens of thousands of votes, and when carefully targeted, can alter the results of the Presidential Election and the control of Congress.

Voter Fraud is extremely rare, and has little or no effect on results.

Election Fraud is accomplished by:

1. Altering votes

2. Not counting votes

3. Limiting votes

Voter Fraud has been an excuse to enact election laws and encourage policies which accomplish #3 on the previous list, "limiting votes", particularly in low-income and urban areas, which tend to vote Democratic.

Voter Fraud was only raised as an issue after the 2004 election to distract from the multiple instances of Election Fraud investigated and documented in the January 6, 2005 report based on the Field Hearings held by the Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee during December 2004 in Ohio, entitled "Preserving Democracy: What Went Wrong in Ohio". This report became part of the Congressional Record that same day in January when the late Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs-Jones, backed by Senator Barbara Boxer, stood up to Vice President Cheney during the certification of the election and challenged the Ohio results.

The following March, as the soon-to-be imprisoned Congressman Bob Ney, Chair of the House Administration Committee (and author of the Diebold/Jack Abramoff- influenced Help Amerca Vote Act) finally prepared to hold a hearing on the irregularities of the 2004 election, suddenly, out of the blue came a self-proclaimed expert on "voter fraud", Mark "Thor" Hearne of the brand new "American Center For Voting Rights" to testify at the hearing and at the Carter Baker Election Reform Panel the following week.

Watching the insignificant issue of voter fraud take focus away from what really happened, Brad Friedman, investigative blogger for wwwbradblog.com, dug a little into this new expert and his organization, and was able to quickly reveal that Mr. Thor Hearne turned out to be the General Counsel for the Bush/Cheney 2004 campaign.

A later report on Voter Fraud for the Election Assistance Commission was withheld from the public because it found voter fraud was widely-understood to be a non-issue. It was only released after the language was altered to suggest that voter fraud's significance was still in dispute.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://oneperson-knowmore.blogspot.com

"Look around. You're not alone, and you know what we need to know. So go tell it on the mountains and in the cities. From your websites and laptops, tell it. From the street corners and coffeehouse, tell it. From delis and diners, tell it. From the (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

A Little More by Barbara Bellows-TerraNova on Saturday, Sep 27, 2008 at 7:25:22 PM
You've done your homework, Barbara. by Mark E. Smith on Saturday, Sep 27, 2008 at 11:00:14 PM
Not giving up by Barbara Bellows-TerraNova on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:06:16 AM
How do you see things, Barbara? by Mark E. Smith on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:31:30 PM
Not giving up by Sharon Froehlich on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:06:57 PM
Thank you Sharon. by Mark E. Smith on Monday, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:09:58 AM
Getting back to the vending machine analogy. by Mark E. Smith on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:42:18 PM
OK, I'll take the analogy. by Charlie L on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 2:54:04 PM
Charlie by Sharon Froehlich on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:59:46 PM
But your analogy doesn't hold, Charlie. by Mark E. Smith on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:37:38 PM
Responding by Barbara Bellows-TerraNova on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:29:15 PM
Barbara, I spent many years.... by Mark E. Smith on Monday, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:36:57 AM
Sorry, typo above. by Mark E. Smith on Monday, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:42:27 AM
Those without arguments.... by Mark E. Smith on Monday, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:18:29 AM