Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   25 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Conspiracy Theory Burden of Proof

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 5/2/13

From http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:World_conspiracies_pyramid.jpg: World conspiracies pyramid
World conspiracies pyramid by Wikipedia

The wake of the Boston Marathon bombings brought with it an undertow of conspiracy theories ranging from the farfetched to the unbelievable. Two weeks ago, I never would have imagined being asked to explain, in casual social situations, what a "false flag' attack is. On The David Pakman Show, inspired in great part by curiosity about the response it would bring, we've been debunking many of these theories. In dissecting much of the material, in particular one short video released by Glenn Beck, I've been able to identify the fundamental misunderstanding that impedes productive conversation with conspiracy theorists. This is not an indication of my personal belief that any specific conspiracy theory is or is not true. This is not a denial, on my part, that governments don't sometimes lie, distort, and distract, but merely an attempt to point out the fallacious nature of many conspiratorial arguments

 For the unfamiliar, Glenn Beck is a former morning radio host turned former Fox News host turned current conservative internet video and nationally syndicated radio host. His video program is known -- among my circles -- for dramatically filmed conservative rants, slow-zooming tirades against President Obama, and majestic wide shots during which Beck states that God guided Mitt Romney to lose a Presidential debate. Glenn Beck was the catalyst for the realization I write about today.

Shortly after the Boston Marathon bombing, Beck developed and expanded on a theory about the young Saudi national who was injured in the explosion. Initially incorrectly assumed to be a suspect in the immediate aftermath on April 15th, Beck believes he is actually an Al-Qaeda recruiter who the government is trying to sneak out of the country. The theory is much more involved, but the details are irrelevant to my discussion here.

After outlining his case, Beck repeated the fundamental misunderstanding that so many conspiracy theorists hold. "The burden of proof is on the federal government," Beck said, "and so far they have not presented one shred of evidence that has refuted what The Blaze (Beck's associated internet media ouetlet) has reported."

This is the central issue and fundamental problem surrounding conspiracy theories and theorists. The burden of proof is not transferred to whoever is accused by the conspiracy theorist. The desire for the federal government to address whether the moon landing was faked, whether 9/11 was an "inside job,' or whether the Boston Marathon bombing was a "false flag operation' does not transfer the burden of proof to the federal government. The burden of proof is on he who proposes the theory.

This lack of understanding of the burden of proof, combined with the fact that it is very difficult to prove a negative, make it virtually impossible to satisfy many conspiracy theorists that their theory, while not provably false, has not been proven positively with evidence. This is why the reaction to many of the debunkings we've done on The David Pakman Show are met with the response that we have not proven to the conspiracy theorist that they're theory is false.

There's an additional layer. Many of these conspiracy theories and theorists rest on basic philosophical disagreements about how knowledge is obtained. If you choose to engage with such theorists, you might find yourself "negotiating down,' as the case may be, by citing a specific piece of evidence that contradicts their theory. A common response will be to question how you really know that the evidence you are citing is real, and its fabrication is not part of the very conspiracy they cite. As you continue this downward negotiation, you arrive at the point where any evidence not physically observed by you, beyond any possibility of subterfuge or manipulation, must be discounted as evidence.

The counterpoint to this -- and this is the key to the double standard -- is that the conspiracy theory itself is no doubt based on the same type of evidence that, when used to disprove, is called unreliable. With the case of the Boston Bombing, while arguing that we can't believe what media and government officials tells us and show us, we see intricate conspiracy theories based on analyses of the exact media and government statements, images, videos, and documents that the conspiracists themselves allege can't be trusted.

Further exploration of the concept "burden of proof" by conspiracy theorists would lead to more reasoned thinking, less baseless ideas, and far fewer awkward conversations at social gatherings. As Wikipedia states, "when debating any issue, there is an implicit burden of proof on the person asserting the claim." Alex Michalos wrote in 1969, as cited by Wikipedia, "if this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed." Let's avoid appealing to ignorance. Am I wrong about this? Email me through our website.

David Pakman, host of the internationally syndicated political talk radio and television program, "The David Pakman Show," writes a monthly column. He can be reached at http://www.davidpakman.com.

 

David Pakman is the host of The David Pakman Show, an internationally syndicated progressive talk radio and television program airing on over 110 stations across 4 countries, on DirecTV, DISH Network, and across the web on a hugely popular podcast (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Expect Insurers to Pull Out Stops to Prevent Vermont Single Payer Healthcare

Conspiracy Theory Burden of Proof

Fox News Labels Elie Wiesel "Holocaust Winner" & Conveniently Labels Bad Republicans as Dems

What's Worse Than Blind Patriotism? Fake Patriotism

Obama Derangement Syndrome and A Tipping Point for Progress

We're all in a blue state of mind

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
19 people are discussing this page, with 25 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

You have to look for evidence, not waste your time... by Joe Giambrone on Thursday, May 2, 2013 at 1:56:20 PM
Ad hominem rants to bolster your fragile egos are ... by Joe Giambrone on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 12:40:22 PM
Talking with conspiracy nuts can be very frustrati... by S. Juniper on Thursday, May 2, 2013 at 2:04:34 PM
The term "conspiracy theory" is employed to discou... by Joe Giambrone on Thursday, May 2, 2013 at 2:51:53 PM
I find it ironic that George Bush recently referre... by Anonymo St Wanted on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 7:27:11 AM
What is the opposite of your "conspiracy nuts" ? A... by Bill Mack on Thursday, May 2, 2013 at 5:22:34 PM
So who are the conspiray nuts? I have no comment ... by Jim Miles on Thursday, May 2, 2013 at 6:02:32 PM
What clearly supported facts are you talking about... by Amy Schreiner on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 11:25:10 PM
You say the burden of proof should be on the propo... by Fred W on Thursday, May 2, 2013 at 2:08:22 PM
We have a semantics problem here.  Almost eve... by Richard Pietrasz on Thursday, May 2, 2013 at 5:03:10 PM
Not all human endeavours are conspiracies. A cons... by Jim Miles on Thursday, May 2, 2013 at 6:13:41 PM
Maybe what's needed is a definition of "conspiracy... by Ken Eidel on Thursday, May 2, 2013 at 6:57:33 PM
  This author talks too much and lends creden... by Howard Lewis on Thursday, May 2, 2013 at 8:06:30 PM
Exactly. The only time I ever hear anything about... by Joe Giambrone on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 12:12:07 PM
Censored: Uncle Ruslan Tsarni May Have Funded Terr... by Joe Giambrone on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 12:15:39 PM
the use of Glenn Beck as an example certainly make... by Paul McArthur on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 5:05:54 PM
Yes, conspiracies happen, but there is good reason... by Daniel Vasey on Thursday, May 2, 2013 at 8:12:46 PM
I will probably be one of those "conspiracy nuts' ... by Deborah Dills on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 12:21:14 AM
spot on deborah!!! it is disgraceful the way the ... by laurie steele on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 3:45:33 AM
you quote Wikipedia, saying '  there is an im... by siamdave on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 12:58:13 AM
The burden of proof lies with those who have the p... by Jim Arnold on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 9:53:44 AM
Dzhokhar Tsaranev   is seen in all  M... by Richard Eastman on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 5:29:58 PM
Is this a parody? You cannot seriously be basing e... by Blessed56 on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 8:37:12 PM
"All that is fact?"  You must be kidding to e... by Blessed56 on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 8:42:13 PM
we wouldn't have so called conspiracy theories. Wh... by dorothy przystas on Friday, May 3, 2013 at 9:52:12 PM