Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 5 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   6 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Bitcoin: Destroyer of Central Banks?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 4/7/14

- Advertisement -

St. Louis Fed's VP calls Bitcoins a "threat" to central banks. How realistic is that claim?

Are Bitcoins, and other e-coins, ready to take over the U.S. Dollar?
(image by Bit-Square)

A currency comprises three market demands: (1) as medium of exchange, or substitute for simple barter; (2) as a divisible and fungible, or consistent, medium of exchange, e.g., five $1 bills always equal one $5 bill; and (3) as a store of value so that its value fluctuates minimally.

E-currencies like Bitcoin, Litecoin, Dogecoin, and Reddcoin beat the U.S. Dollar in the first requirement because they are divisible into several decimal places. Because the currencies are mined, or created, through blocks, or cooperative mining algorithms, the currency's safety is ensured through a public tender ledger and, on a micro-scale certainly, surmounts the threat of potentially counterfeit U.S. Dollars, thus beating the second requirement. It is the third requirement, which is basically price stability, that the St. Louis Federal Reserve's Vice President tells Business Insider may mean e-currencies giving central banks a run for their money, both figuratively and literally.

Bitcoin's "existence as a threat is very good: It will discipline the Fed and other central banks to continue to run responsible policies -- if they don't, people could switch to something else," David Andolfatto says. He continues: "The purpose of currency controls is to stimulate demand for domestic currency, because the central bank and the central government want to exploit the people by inflating excessively, so the threat of currency competition -- if a central bank, a government knew people could stop using domestic currency and flock to alternative, that would force the government to behave more responsibly."

- Advertisement -

The Internal Revenue Service recently ruled that Bitcoin is property, which, being a tax, undermines any non-inflationary advantage against the USD by double-digit percentage points. Not that Bitcoin has stabilized to the point that it can be considered a stable  store of value, despite historical upward trends. E-currencies are nowhere near the stability or popularity to even contest central banks.

But e-coins can be purchased and transferred easily and quickly between buyers-and-sellers, which curbs most price fluctuations of the medium. And there the greater gravity lies in the potential for e-currencies to sew the seeds of agorist counter-economics, or the proliferation of innately anti-state market activity. When that, and its broad implications, is spotlighted by the national media, the voluntaryist principles buttressing e-currencies will rise and potentially reach some political mainstream. And that invites discussion of heterodox ideologies from anarcho-capitalism to invite-only socialism.

- Advertisement -

Melvin Davila Martinez is a freelance writer whose work has been published in The New American, Seeking Alpha, and Fox Nation. mdm[at]memobeacon[dot]com.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Bitcoin: Destroyer of Central Banks?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Another day another e-coin. With the rise of Dogec... by Melvin Davila Martinez on Monday, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:33:18 AM
Anything that gives the Fed and the Central bankin... by Michael Germain on Monday, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:33:50 AM
Agreed. ... by Melvin Davila Martinez on Monday, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:03:41 PM
The basic idea of Bitcoin is excellent, BUT as lon... by urb musak on Wednesday, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:17:55 PM
The idea of using different kinds of currencies f... by David Chester on Tuesday, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:57:34 AM
Interesting, but Bitcoin is just the tip of the ic... by bray pento on Thursday, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:56:21 AM