Tag(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   News 4   Supported 4   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 8/2/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

Bipartisan Debt Deal Betrayal

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (163 fans)   -- Page 1 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com

Bipartisan Debt Deal Betrayal - by Stephen Lendman

Seven previous articles explained the following:

(1) Bipartisan lying manipulated popular sentiment to believe what political Washington won't tolerate - defaulting or not raising the debt ceiling. In fact, it's been done routinely 74 times since 1962, including 10 times in the last decade. Moreover, whatever may unfold ahead, default won't happen now, and top officials know it.

In addition as Ellen Brown explains in her latest article headlined, "Bipartisan 'Russian Roulette' and America's Federal Debt: The Debt Ceiling Is Unconstitutional," authority under the 14th Amendment's Section 4 mandates paying public debt obligations.

Despite a nonsensical 1917 law imposing a debt limit, the 14th Amendment says "the validity of the public debt of the United States....shall not be questioned." As a result, "(w)here statute and the Constitution collide, the Constitution prevails." It's constitutionally mandated, "not a matter of negotiation."

Moreover, "(t)he debt crisis was created, not by a social safety net bought and paid for by," payroll tax deduction insurance premiums, contractually obligating Washington to pay benefits as mandated.

"The debt ceiling crisis" also was manufactured, "engineered to extort concessions that will lock the middle class in debt peonage for decades to come."

Indeed that and much more as previous articles explained, recapped briefly below.

(2) Weeks, perhaps months ago, the fix was in to destroy America's social contract incrementally with multiple cuts over a number of years. Principally, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and publicly funded pensions are targeted for total elimination. 

Then, or perhaps coincidentally, everything else, ending all social benefits, returning America to 19th harshness. Republicans have long sought eliminating all New Deal and Great Society programs. Obama-led Democrats agree.

(3) Obama, America's first Black president, was chosen for this purpose, doing what no Republican would dare. It was classic reverse Nixon goes to China. No Democrat would have tried when no diplomatic relations existed. 

Obama is rock-hard conservative, a pro-war, pro-corporate, anti-human/civil rights ideologue neocon, pretending to be populist. His legacy's now written, exposing him as the president who reversed a century of social progress. 

Write it down, remember it, and get mad enough to resist. The alternative's too harsh to accept. Moreover, it violates the Constitution's "general welfare" clause - Article I, Section 8, stating:

"The Congress shall have power to....provide for (the) general welfare of the United States," meaning all citizens, not just the privileged few. 

In addition, the Preamble's opening words are "We the People," everyone, even though political Washington violated constitutional provisions from inception, including who benefits and who doesn't.

On Sunday, the tradition was upheld. Phase I's now done. Expect further cuts through 2012, then more major ones if voters foolishly reelect Obama or a Republican in 2012, or any member of America's duopoly ever. 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

I was born in 1934, am a retired, progressive small businessman concerned about all the major national and world issues, committed to speak out and write about them.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Obama is NOT coservative; he's a REACTIONARY by Jill Herendeen on Tuesday, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:20:11 AM
"Conservative" being one of the deceptive lies foisted on us by Jill Herendeen on Tuesday, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:27:31 AM
We are so screwed by Richard Girard on Tuesday, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:56:11 PM