Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Big Business Lobbyists Steamroll Medicare Patients, Main St. Small Businesses

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

It is not uncommon for politicians to view policy debates through the lens of Main St. vs. Wall St. We hear this refrain from both sides of the political spectrum. We hear it so often that the phrase becomes cliché. Yet we must be mindful that there are issues that in essence do boil down to the Main St.-vs.-Wall St. paradigm. One example of this is the pharmacy choice proposal recently suggested -- and then withdrawn -- by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as part of a rule regarding Medicare Advantage plans and Medicare Part D drug plans for 2015.   

The pharmacy-choice provision (sometimes referred to as "any willing pharmacy") is supported by Main Street independent pharmacies; consumer advocacy groups, such as Consumer Action and the Medicare Rights Center; some of the largest unions; and a bipartisan list of members of Congress that span the political spectrum.

Currently, some Medicare drug plans provide beneficiaries an incentive in the form of a lower copayment to utilize the network's "preferred" pharmacy instead of other pharmacies in the network. The problem is the plans don't allow any pharmacy willing to accept the contractual terms and conditions to serve as a preferred pharmacy. They limit these special contracts to cherry-picked pharmacies. CMS' own financial analyses found that in many instances these sweetheart deals are actually raising Medicare costs.

Medicare officials drew two conclusions. First, they should prohibit "preferred"-pharmacy arrangements from costing taxpayers more than traditional plans with more patient choice. Second, the best way to encourage competition and to lower costs is to allow any willing pharmacy to participate in preferred networks.

Beneficiaries would also be able to choose a pharmacy based on quality and service for the same out-of-pocket expense. According to a survey conducted by Consumer Reports, the magazine's readers ranked independent pharmacies highest in key categories such as speed and accuracy, courtesy and helpfulness, and pharmacists' knowledge. Large chain and big-box pharmacies as well as PBM-owned mail-order companies didn't rank as high in those areas.

Enter Wall Street. Multi-billion-dollar corporations called pharmacy-benefit managers (PBMs) that run the drug plans don't want to open networks to competition. They engaged in scare tactics claiming huge cost increases if the any-willing-pharmacy policy is adopted. But if more pharmacies are accepting contract terms that the large PBMs set, that should foster more competition, decreasing costs in Medicare Part D.

- Advertisement -

While the aforementioned proposal improves the Medicare program for beneficiaries and allows Main St. small-business pharmacies to compete, opponents seized on an unpopular aspect of the CMS' proposal as an excuse to throw the whole rule out altogether.  CMS proposed to reduce the number of "protected-class" drugs. This understandably caused concern among patient advocates and prompted CMS to shelve the idea. Unfortunately, Medicare acquiesced to the scare tactics of the big PBMs and put its any-willing-pharmacy proposal on hold as well.

While we commend CMS for working so hard to bring the pro-patient, pro-pharmacist any-willing-pharmacy policy to the forefront, we are disappointed that the agency has tabled it. Given the broad bipartisan and consumer-advocate support, now is the time for Congress to introduce and enact Medicare pharmacy-choice legislation. Don't further sacrifice patients and Main St. in order to please the Wall St. PBMs.

- Advertisement -

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Demand the "any willing provider" provision be included in Medicare Part D preferred plans

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

B. Douglas Hoey, RPh, MBA Hoey is the Chief Executive Officer of the National Community Pharmacists Association. He has spent 20+ years working in and representing community pharmacies. NCPA represents the 23,000 community pharmacies and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Improve Access to Prescription Drugs in Urban Areas

Big Business Lobbyists Steamroll Medicare Patients, Main St. Small Businesses

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

... by Douglas Hoey on Wednesday, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:13:38 AM
This is just another example of big corporations w... by Howard Schneider on Friday, May 2, 2014 at 1:21:19 PM