OpEdNews Op Eds

Bad Sex in Fiction Criteria Applied to Obama's Narrative Strategy

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

The Irish author Rowan Somerville won this year's "Bad Sex in Fiction" award, an annual celebration of prose that fails to, er , inspire confidence. The award winner's most failed purple passage was this one: "Like a lepidopterist mounting a tough-skinned insect with a too blunt pin he screwed himself into her."

In my humble opinion the award, which had several other notable nominees ranging from Jonathan Franzen's novel Freedom to Tony Blair's memoirs, missed an opportunity by not nominating the core political narrative of Barack Obama in the 2010 election campaign. That core narrative was: "Things would be a lot worse without us."

So lame was his message and so often was it repeated in conjunction with the "car in the ditch" metaphor that most Americans turned away from Democrats and gave a Bronx cheer to his presidency. Even those of us who support him--and still support him, God bless us every one--have, as the Righteous Brothers' put it, "lost that lovin' feelin'."

The criteria for the "Bad Sex in Fiction" award is not available in a published document, although the judges seem to apply Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's pornography test of "I know it when I see it" to the books they are asked to evaluate. In this case, they know bad sex writing when they read it. And in my case, I know a bad political core narrative strategy when I hear it. My guess is, so do you.

A bad political core narrative strategy, like bad sex writing, conforms to the following three criteria:

  1. The narrative reduces a peak human experience to the mechanical connection of parts while using a bad metaphor to suggest that a rare truth is being suddenly revealed. For example: Our car, which is the U.S. economy, is driven into the ditch, which is the present Near-Great Depression.
  2. The narrative obscures emotional connection, passion, and intimacy by replacing its appeal with a rational exercise of linguistic good judgment in the form of a truncated syllogism suitable only for the procreation of an obvious conclusion . For example: We need to get the car back on the road. The Republican who drove us into the ditch obviously can't drive. It's our turn.
  3. It is neither memorable nor does it inspire confidence that its author "gets it." For example: Things would be worse without us.

In either case--whether the narrative is a bedroom scene or a campaign slogan--the author's prior reputation for narrative prowess, or even for a skilled performance, is now viewed differently, called into serious question, and perhaps even thought of as having been oversold. The result is predictable: A "Bad Sex" award for fiction, a negative election outcome for the president.

So what to do?

There are a number of us who recognize that Obama's problems with the public cannot be solved by putting together a new economic team, or a foreign policy team, any more than lighting the White House Christmas tree can solve the energy crisis. Our president's problem is not one of policies but of communication about those policies with the American people. And furthermore, it is communication problem amplified by his stubborn insistence on a calm presentation of facts done up as good reasons over this most basic of narrative best-practices: story drives information because they appeal to our imagination. And, as the 18th century rhetorician George Campbell knew, "enlivening the imagination " better moves the will."

Obama's communication team has it wrong. They have confused metaphor for story, and reasoning for governing. A metaphor can be an element in a good story, just as good reasons can and should be elements in governing. But until they figure out that America loves nothing so much as a better story than the one we have now , they will never win the hearts or the minds of the electorate.

 

H. L. (Bud) Goodall, Jr. lives in Arizona where he is a college professor and writer. He has published 20 books and many articles and chapters on a variety of communication issues. His most recent books include Counter-Narrative: How Progressive (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Republican Hate Narrative Against Public Employees and Unions

What is "The American Dream?": John Boehner vs. Barack Obama vs. Walter Trout

Divided We Fall

Sarah Palin's Narrative Makeover: Cosmetic Surgery Applied to Her Story

The Liberal Inside of Me

The Republican War on Higher Education: Abraham Lincoln Weeps

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

"Things would have been worse without us" is hardl... by Bud Goodall on Thursday, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:54:42 AM