OpEdNews Op Eds

Backfire!

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   News 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 2/21/13

Become a Fan
  (42 fans)
Cross-posted from Mike Malloy



The inaugural address is history, the State of the Union speech is over, and all that is left is the incessant gridlock over what policies -- if any -- will be enacted to save this shining ship of states from careening over the so-called fiscal cliff and into the abyss.

Matters not how many times the red-eyed, Merlot-sodden, tobacco-stained John Boehner wipes the tears from his rheumy eyes and slurs out semi-comprehensible accusations at Obama, insisting this sequester is somehow the President's fault (forget the fact that all spending bills originate in his House of Representatives -- seems he's forgotten that. Maybe it was a during a blackout). All that matters is that Boehner and his minions continue to put our economy in serious peril, while blaming others for their risky schemes.

As HuffPo reports:

"In a Wall Street Journal op-ed published Tuesday evening, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) blamed President Obama for the nearly $1.2 trillion in across-the-board spending cuts set to go into effect next month, labeling the looming cuts as 'the president's sequester.'

"'Most Americans are just hearing about this Washington creation for the first time: the sequester,' Boehner writes. 'What they might not realize from Mr. Obama's statements is that it is a product of the president's own failed leadership.'"

Okay, reality check. The sequester was created by the Budget Control Act of 2011, an act of Congress. Not the President. Congress. This Act mandated spending cuts if the congressional "super committee" was unable to formulate a compromise agreement on deficit reduction. This came to fruition in November 2011, when the super committee was unable to seal a deal, and that resulted in the defense and domestic spending cuts -- the sequester -- that were set to take place in January 2010, but are now delayed until March 1st. 

But as Brett LoGiurato writing in "The Business Insider" explains, Boehner's plan to dump the blame from his failure into  the President's lap may backfire -- badly:

"Boehner is arguing that the sequester will be incredibly damaging -- it 'threatens U.S. national security, thousands of jobs and more.' But at the same time, Republicans are prepared to let the sequester kick in if Democrats don't agree to an equal amount of cuts in entitlement spending. In essence, Boehner is prepared to support a policy that he says threatens national security and jobs."

And, Byron York writes in the Washington Examiner...

"Could the GOP message on the sequester be any more self-defeating? Boehner could argue that the sequester cuts are necessary as a first -- and somewhat modest -- step toward controlling the deficits that threaten the economy. Instead, he describes them as a threat to national security and jobs that he nevertheless supports. It's not an argument that is likely to persuade millions of Americans."

York's argument was seized immediately by White House press secretary Jay Carney in his press briefing earlier today. "The President believes it is essential that we avoid these cuts," Carney said after reading a passage from York's piece. "It is bad policy. The Speaker himself says it is bad policy. We -- the Congress, rather, must act to make sure it doesn't happen."

On the other end of the spectrum, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh also cited York's piece and wondered "what Speaker Boehner is thinking."

Me-ow! It's not looking too rosy for John-the-Crier if Lord Limbaugh himself is frowning on him from high upon his golden microphone. Don't you love it when they start to eat their own?

 

www.mikemalloy.com

Kathy never expected a career in radio as a talk show producer. Born and raised in Atlanta, Georgia, Kathy was completing her nursing degree when in 2001 - in an emergency - she was asked to fill in as the producer of Mike's program. Within a few (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

March of the Mysogynists

The Grinch Who Stole Health Reform

Saving Earth

Hunger in America

Tea For Two...

Extinction Level Event . . .?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

There is a core bipartisan agenda, to redistribute... by Dan Mage on Friday, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:34:43 AM