Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   16 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Bachmann "Submission" Question Highly Valid

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 8/13/11

There is nothing quite like the demagoguery and illogical absurdity with which Republicans play the presidential politics game.

Just as four years ago Republicans shrieked and howled over the zeal of the mainstream media and Democrats to "get" Sarah Palin they are back at it now claiming that Michele Bachmann is being trashed.

Such is the case in dog and pony show land in which highly paid consultants play the Democrats versus Republicans game while a one party corporatist party rules and the empire seeks new lands to invade and occupy. The Republicans doing the loudest howling are partisans who never raised so much as a whisper when mudmeisters such as Lee Atwater and Karl Rove combined the worst of McCarthyism and "good old boys" southern racism against opponents.

It was a "smear" against poor Sarah Palin when that notorious media pit bull Katie Couric dared ask her which newspapers she read. Based on Couric's voice tone and body language, this was a perceived softball question to make Palin feel comfortable with the interview process.

Now we now hear the same charge being registered for alleged mistreatment of Michele Bachmann. A chorus of boos was registered at Thursday's Republican presidential candidates debate in Ames, Iowa after reporter Byron York asked Bachmann about a statement made concerning her being "submissive" in her relationship with her husband.

Bachmann delivered a cool response that gave evidence of being canned in the way that certain Ronald Reagan presidential responses were. It looked like a familiar technique of having a question asked under friendly circumstances early in a campaign rather than have it surface later under more difficult circumstances.

Despite the chorus of boos, the questioner was hardly Dan Rather asking Richard Nixon a tough question about Watergate without the benefit of preparation. Byron York, after all, gained recognition as White House correspondent for National Review, hardly to be mistaken for The Village Voice. Rather than acting perturbed or defensive, Bachmann thanked York for his question and delivered her response. In the discussion about the question the revealing answer has been garbled if not lost in the process.

Bachmann replied that in the context of her marital relationship they both defined the word "submissive" as embodying mutual respect. This is hardly the way that Webster's Dictionary defines the word.

Webster's defines the meaning of submissive as "inclined or readiness to submit; acknowledging one's inferiority; yielding; obedient; humble; showing a readiness to submit; expressing submission; as, a submissive demeanor."

It is also instructive to examine the context in which the "submissive" statement was made. It came in a 2006 interview in which Bachmann revealed that she decided to study tax law because it was suggested by her husband even though she hated the idea. Bachmann further explained that she heeded his recommendation because, as is taught in the Bible, a good wife is supposed to follow her husband. The statement context is in perfect harmony with the Webster definition. The husband leads and the wife follows, a classic definition of submission.

While respect is defined as "to regard as worthy of special consideration" and this, more than likely, was examined and decided in advance to be the best course of action by the Bachmann high command, there is a chasm separating respectful consideration and outright submission in the context of conservative biblical fundamentalists.

Why is the question relevant? More than likely it scares the Bachmann camp because it puts the candidate in a thorny position should it be pursued. Bachmann, a Tea Party favorite, needs the religious right, a natural component of her Republican primary strategy.

Here is the ultimate problem. At one point or another, especially if she becomes the Republican presidential nominee, Bachmann would need to expand beyond her natural base to independents and other voters occupying the vital center where national elections are ultimately decided.

How would the Bachmann fundamentalist Christian strain play be perceived by a broader electorate on the issue of wives submitting to husbands? How would this play with a candidate for the presidency? Would she as president defer to her husband?

Whether she stands pat or strays, Bachmann would upset many in a broad national electorate no matter how she answered.

 

Began in the journalism field in hometown of Los Angeles. Started as Sports Editor and Movie Writer at Inglewood Daily News chain after working in sportswriting of high school events at the Los Angeles Examiner.

Received a bachelor's in (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Koch Brothers Own Scott Walker

The Casey Anthony Photo that Dominates the Trial

Reagan, Deregulation and the Slippery Road to Poisoned Assets

When the CIA Overthrew Iran for British Petroleum

Did 12 Heads of Cabbage Decide the Casey Anthony Trial?

Fox News and the Dumbing Down of America

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
on the issues they scream "smear" and "foul" which... by Bill Hare on Saturday, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:06:25 PM
A friend of mine asked this:  If Michele were... by Judy Palmer on Saturday, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:55:55 PM
harkens back to George W. Bush.  He said... by Bill Hare on Saturday, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:10:12 PM
You should have heard how Sean Hannity discussed t... by Gustav Wynn on Saturday, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:46:20 PM
that Bachmann, Palin and that whole Tea Party stra... by Bill Hare on Sunday, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:19:00 AM
Remove Post can you tell me where I ... by tim mcghie on Saturday, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:58:29 PM
out there formed by wing nuts of the hard-nosed Pa... by Bill Hare on Sunday, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:25:47 AM
An interesting tidbit of history is that church th... by John Reed on Sunday, Aug 14, 2011 at 6:19:19 AM
between the Christianity embraced by the religious... by Bill Hare on Sunday, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:08:21 PM
I have always wondered how the fundamentalists dea... by John Reed on Sunday, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:02:28 PM
Excellent article Bill. Bachmann's submissive cont... by Howard Schneider on Sunday, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:14:03 AM
comments are right on point.  Rollins fashion... by Bill Hare on Sunday, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:04:18 PM
As the recent recall election in WI proved yet aga... by Jill Herendeen on Sunday, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:32:31 PM
you noticed the highly relevant paragraph I wrote ... by Bill Hare on Sunday, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:12:46 PM
While everyone is distracted on the presidentisl r... by Gustav Wynn on Sunday, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:19:55 PM
and I know that these are power seeking indiv... by Bill Hare on Sunday, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:20:50 PM