Tag(s): , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

Baby, I love you!

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (4 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

My 17 year old daughter is severely disabled.  My husband and I are both mature, successful professionals.  Our daughter’s care has—without complaint—drawn deeply on our resources and reserves, both financially and emotionally.  I could not envision having capably dealt with the challenges of providing her with a safe, loving home if I had been 17 rather than 37 when she was born.

Why consider such a hypothetical situation?  Because I was pondering another “hypothetical situation”.  Let us say that a 44 year old mother’s 17 year old daughter delivers a baby with a disability, such as, oh, for example, Down’s syndrome.  Even with the best intentions, 17 year olds rarely have the complement of skills and resources to be ideal parents.  The additional challenges of parenting a special needs child, one who may need interventional medical care, social service support, occupational and physical therapy, special education services, etc,… might overwhelm a single parent of any age.  For a single teen, the involvement of her extended family might be life-saving for both her and her child with disabilities.   Either guardianship or official adoption of the child by the maternal grandmother and grandfather with the single teen’s consent could be viewed as a way to guarantee effective parenting to meet the baby’s needs, while allowing the teen to co-parent to the extent that she is willing or able.  Under such circumstances, the arrangement would pass ethical review.

What would not pass ethical review would be for the baby’s grandparents to pretend that the child is theirs so they could—hypothetically--disguise their teen’s pregnancy.  Nor would it be ethical for these grandparents to, let’s say, use the baby’s disability to enhance their political resumés as advocates for people with disabilities, especially when their promises to fully support and expand funding for IDEA (The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) contains a not-so-hidden school voucher program that could draw funds from public to parochial schools, potentially their real agenda.

Parenting a daughter with disabilities has taught us the meaning of unconditional love.  I would wish that all parents could so unconditionally love their children, and be able to honestly acknowledge and assist with the realities and consequences of teen behavior--without resorting to the “hypothetical”.


Trig, Bristol, Willow, and Sarah

 

Jill Jackson is a writer, mother, wife, military veteran, and hard-core pacifist and liberal. She swallowed the red pill after 9/11.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Bristol by Jennifer Moore on Saturday, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:16:50 PM