OpEdNews Op Eds

Axelrod to Maddow, Obama will Fight for the Public Option

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message E. Nelson     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 9/10/09

Become a Fan
  (4 fans)
- Advertisement -
In a speech that invoked the memory of Teddy Kennedy, rebuked the lies and rhetoric of the Republicans, and appealed to the moral character of all Americans, President Obama laid out the framework to pass comprehensive health care for the first time in almost a century.

Since Teddy Roosevelt first called for health care reform, the debate on universal health coverage has been just that -- only debate. John F. Kennedy tried, Harry Truman tried and William Clinton tried and yet nothing major has happened in the health care debate since President Lyndon Johnson passed Medicare in 1965. Former President Harry Truman, who was present to watch the signing, was the first to sign up for this new government program.

President Obama's speech last night, on the ninth day of the ninth month of 2009, was to a joint session of congress with the goal of re-energizing the pursuit of comprehensive health care reform and the continued pledge to pass it before the end of this year. President Obama laid out the following framework:

* "It will provide more security and stability to those who have health insurance."
* "It will provide insurance to those who don't."
* "And it will lower the cost of health care for our families, our businesses, and our government."

Analysis by a number of political pundits have said today that last night's speech by President Obama was a "game-changer". In one of Obama's stronger statements he said, "I am not the first President to take up this cause, but I am determined to be the last."

After Obama's speech, Senior White House advisor David Axelrod unequivocally stated on the Rachel Maddow Show, that Obama "will fight for the public option".
- Advertisement -

Despite all the vitriol the right has demonstrated against Obama's goal of comprehensive health care over the past two months, Obama continued to reach out across the aisle to Republicans and stated that his door is always open to discuss new ideas about bringing health care to all Americans in an affordable and sustainable fashion. However, he said, "I will not waste my time with those who want to kill the plan."

The suggestion that everyone carry at least some level of basic insurance to maintain a large enough pool of insured and keep costs down so that the entire plan is deficit neutral will only work with a public option plan. Without it, the plan is nothing more than a corporate give-away to the Health Insurance companies. This, along with creating competition and choice, are the biggest arguments as to why a public option must be in any final health care reform bill.

House speaker Nancy Pelosi has shown no signs of budging on her pledge that no bill will pass the house without a public option. The AFL-CIO, with the backing of its 11 million members, have unequivocally stated they will pull their support from any Democrat who tries to defeat the public option. After last night's speech and affirmation by a number of top Obama advisors on various cable news it should be clear that Obama will continue to fight for the public option plan. Lest we forget that President Obama is not part of the legislative branch, the ball in now firmly in the court of the United States Senate. With a dwindling number of Senators like Ben Nelson and Max Baucus remaining on the other side of the line in the sand, liberal and progressive groups no longer have moving targets to focus their efforts on.

Senator Barney Frank, a strong proponent of the public option plan, aptly summed it up on the Rachel Maddow show, "the very weakness of their argument is a testament to the strength of ours".

- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Eric Nelson is freelance writer, an editor at OpEdNews, and a spiritual progressive from Minnesota who has become more politically active. The reasons for this should be obvious to most; rising poverty, a broken health care system, and a growing (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How Wisconsin GOP and Kathy Nickolaus Could Have Stolen the Supreme Court Election if They had Wanted to

Probable Case of Swine Flu in Minnesota Occurs in District Represented by Michele Bachmann

Evidence of Republican Election Fraud in the Al Franken, Norm Coleman Senate Race?

Whats Wrong with Waukesha Wisconsin? More Anomalies in Prosser and Kloppenburg Race

Alan Greenspan calls the McCain Economic Plan a Disaster for the Country

Flax Seed: A Natural Alternative to Statins?