Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 1 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   13 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Attack On Sovereignty

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 1/15/13

Become a Fan
  (385 fans)
Cross-posted from Paul Craig Roberts



Those concerned about "The New World Order" speak as if the United States is coming under the control of an outside conspiratorial force. In fact, it is the US that is the New World Order. That is what the American unipolar world, about which China, Russia, and Iran complain, is all about.

Washington has demonstrated that it has no respect for its own laws and Constitution, much less any respect for international law and the law and sovereignty of other countries. All that counts is Washington's will as the pursuit of hegemony moves Washington closer to becoming a world dictator.

The examples are so numerous someone should compile them into a book. During the Reagan administration the long established bank secrecy laws of Switzerland had to bend to Washington's will. The Clinton administration attacked Serbia, murdered civilians and sent Serbia's president to be tried as a war criminal for defending his country. The US government engages in widespread spying on Europeans' emails and telephone calls that is unrelated to terrorism. Julian Assange is confined to the Ecuadoran embassy in London, because Washington won't permit the British government to honor his grant of political asylum. Washington refuses to comply with a writ of habeas corpus from a British count to turn over Yunus Rahmatullah whose detention a British Court of Appeals has ruled to be unlawful. Washington imposes sanctions on other countries and enforces them by cutting sovereign nations that do not comply out of the international payments system.

Last week the Obama regime warned the British government that it was a violation of US interests for the UK to pull out of the European Union or reduce its ties to the EU in any way.

In other words, the sovereignty of Great Britain is not a choice to be made by the British government or people. The decision is made by Washington in keeping with Washington's interest.

The British are so accustomed to being Washington's colony that deputy prime minister Nick Clegg and a group of UK business executives quickly lined up with Washington.

This leaves Great Britain in a quandary. The British economy, once a manufacturing powerhouse, has been reduced to the City of London, Britain's equivalent to Wall Street. London, like New York, is a world financial center of which there are none in Europe. Without its financial status, there wouldn't be much left of the UK.

It is because of the City's financial importance that the UK, alone of the EU member states, kept the British pound as its currency and did not join the euro. Because the UK has its own currency and central bank, the UK was spared the sovereign debt crisis that has plagued other EU member states. The Bank of England, like the Federal Reserve in the US, was able to bail out its own banks, whereas other EU states sharing a common currency could not create money, and the European Central Bank is prohibited by its charter (at Germany's insistence) from bailing out member states.

The quandary for the UK is that the solution to the sovereign debt crisis toward which the EU is moving is to strip the member governments of their fiscal sovereignty. For the individual countries, the spending, taxing and, thereby, deficit or surplus positions of the member countries' budgets will be set by EU central authority. This would mean the end of national sovereignty for European countries.

For Britain to remain an EU member while retaining its own currency and central bank would mean special status for Great Britain. The UK would be the only member of the EU that remained a sovereign country. What are the chances that the UK will be permitted such exceptional status? Is this acceptable to Germany and France?

If the British are to fold themselves into Europe, they will have to give up their currency, central bank, their law, and their economic status as a world financial center and accept governance by the EU bureaucracy. The British will have to give up being somebody and become nobody.

It would, however, free the UK from being Washington's puppet unless the EU itself is Washington's puppet.

According to reports, sometime this year Scotland, a constituent part of the UK, is to vote on leaving the UK and becoming an independent country. How ironic that as the UK debates its dismemberment, the country itself faces being merged into a multi-national state.

 

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/

Dr. Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury for Economic Policy in the Reagan Administration. He was associate editor and columnist with the Wall Street Journal, columnist for Business Week and the Scripps Howard News Service. He is a contributing editor to Gerald Celente's Trends Journal. He has had numerous university appointments. His book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is available here. His latest book,  How America Was Lost, has just been released and can be ordered here.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Libya - The DC/NATO Agenda And The Next Great War

The Road to Armageddon

American Job Loss Is Permanent

A Story...The Last Whistleblower

Pakistan TV Report Contradicts US Claim of Bin Laden's Death

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

You are straightforward. Reading in between the li... by Skyler Trombly on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:14:02 AM
I said this here.... by Michael David Morrissey on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:21:15 AM
Only it is not an attack on sovereignty but on&nbs... by Mark Sashine on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:25:02 AM
The US is the NWO? To some extent this is manifest... by Ernie Messerschmidt on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:14:47 AM
Teetering on the Edge of the Fiscal Cliff ... by Phil Linehan on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:21:03 AM
Not to show any disrespect or find fault with such... by cosmic J. on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:50:02 AM
Those concerned about "The New World Order" speak ... by Michael Dewey on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:49:11 AM
PakAlertPressOn December 23, 1913, when most of co... by Lance Ciepiela on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:12:40 PM
As the top international powers?We may almost be t... by Poor old Dirt farmer on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:56:22 PM
The New World Order is the U.S. Banking Order. The... by Janet Gaudiello on Wednesday, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:51:55 PM
acting as if it is the only game in town. The trut... by Archie on Thursday, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:56:59 PM
but somebody's got to do it! ... by molly cruz on Thursday, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:04:57 PM
Roberts is focused on the correct issue ---- the f... by Alan MacDonald on Friday, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:21:05 AM