Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   22 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

At Last, a "New" Presidential Candidate Progressives Can Support (Or So We Wish)

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Valuable 3   Must Read 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 12/8/11

Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

A fellow claiming to be President Barack Obama spoke about the economy today in Osawatomie, Kansas.  Although this person looked like President Obama, he did not sound like the centrist President we've seen in office the last three years. The person giving the speech spoke like a staunch progressive; the words he used were more like ones we've heard from  Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) or Representative Dennis Kuchinich (D-OH) than from any recent president of the United States.

If it indeed was the real President Obama, important questions need to be asked: Does he really believe what he said?  Who or what got to him? Why hasn't he spoken like this before?  Is this a new political strategy to recapture his lost base? Will he act on these convictions?  Or is this another one of many elegant speeches  followed by inaction? Did the White House hire Paul Krugman or Robert Reich as a speechwriter?


The "New" President Obama? by
Google

Here are some of the amazing highlights of the President's uncharacteristically progressive Kansas speech:

My grandparents served during World War II.  He was a soldier in Patton's Army; she was a worker on a bomber assembly line.  And together, they shared the optimism of a nation that triumphed over the Great Depression and over fascism.  They believed in an America where hard work paid off, and responsibility was rewarded, and anyone could make it if they tried -- no matter who you were, no matter where you came from, no matter how you started out.

And these values gave rise to the largest middle class and the strongest economy that the world has ever known.  It was here in America that the most productive workers, the most innovative companies turned out the best products on Earth.  And you know what?  Every American shared in that pride and in that success -- from those in the executive suites to those in middle management to those on the factory floor. So you could have some confidence that if you gave it your all, you'd take enough home to raise your family and send your kids to school and have your health care covered, put a little away for retirement...

For most Americans, the basic bargain that made this country great has eroded.  Long before the recession hit, hard work stopped paying off for too many people.  Fewer and fewer of the folks who contributed to the success of our economy actually benefited from that success.  Those at the very top grew wealthier from their incomes and their investments -- wealthier than ever before.  But everybody else struggled with costs that were growing and paychecks that weren't -- and too many families found themselves racking up more and more debt just to keep up.  

Now, for many years, credit cards and home equity loans papered over this harsh reality.  But in 2008, the house of cards collapsed.  We all know the story by now:  Mortgages sold to people who couldn't afford them, or even sometimes understand them.  Banks and investors allowed to keep packaging the risk and selling it off.  Huge bets -- and huge bonuses -- made with other people's money on the line.  Regulators who were supposed to warn us about the dangers of all this, but looked the other way or didn't have the authority to look at all.

It was wrong.  It combined the breathtaking greed of a few with irresponsibility all across the system.  And it plunged our economy and the world into a crisis from which we're still fighting to recover.  It claimed the jobs and the homes and the basic security of millions of people -- innocent, hardworking Americans who had met their responsibilities but were still left holding the bag...

But, Osawatomie, this is not just another political debate. This is the defining issue of our time.  This is a make-or-break moment for the middle class, and for all those who are fighting to get into the middle class.  Because what's at stake is whether this will be a country where working people can earn enough to raise a family, build a modest savings, own a home, secure their retirement.

Now, in the midst of this debate, there are some who seem to be suffering from a kind of collective amnesia.  After all that's happened, after the worst economic crisis, the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, they want to return to the same practices that got us into this mess.  In fact, they want to go back to the same policies that stacked the deck against middle-class Americans for way too many years.  And their philosophy is simple:  We are better off when everybody is left to fend for themselves and play by their own rules.  

I am here to say they are wrong.  I'm here in Kansas to reaffirm my deep conviction that we're greater together than we are on our own.  I believe that this country succeeds when everyone gets a fair shot, when everyone does their fair share, when everyone plays by the same rules. These aren't Democratic values or Republican values.  These aren't 1 percent values or 99 percent values.  They're American values.  And we have to reclaim them.

You see, this isn't the first time America has faced this choice.  At the turn of the last century, when a nation of farmers was transitioning to become the world's industrial giant, we had to decide:  Would we settle for a country where most of the new railroads and factories were being controlled by a few giant monopolies that kept prices high and wages low?  Would we allow our citizens and even our children to work ungodly hours in conditions that were unsafe and unsanitary?  Would we restrict education to the privileged few?  Because there were people who thought massive inequality and exploitation of people was just the price you pay for progress.

Theodore Roosevelt disagreed.  He was the Republican son of a wealthy family.  He praised what the titans of industry had done to create jobs and grow the economy.  He believed then what we know is true today, that the free market is the greatest force for economic progress in human history.  It's led to a prosperity and a standard of living unmatched by the rest of the world.

But Roosevelt also knew that the free market has never been a free license to take whatever you can from whomever you can.  (Applause.)  He understood the free market only works when there are rules of the road that ensure competition is fair and open and honest.  And so he busted up monopolies, forcing those companies to compete for consumers with better services and better prices.  And today, they still must.  He fought to make sure businesses couldn't profit by exploiting children or selling food or medicine that wasn't safe.  And today, they still can't.    

And in 1910, Teddy Roosevelt came here to Osawatomie and he laid out his vision for what he called a New Nationalism.  "Our country," he said, ""means nothing unless it means the triumph of a real democracy"of an economic system under which each man shall be guaranteed the opportunity to show the best that there is in him."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

thebigpicturereport.com

Arlen is a writer/blogger living in Monterey, CA. His political blog is thebigpicturereport.com. He writes a weekly quotation quiz "What's Your QQ?" (Quotation Quotient) for the Monterey Herald, as well as a quotationquotient.com website and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

"No War By Any Nation in Any Age Has Ever Been Declared By the People"

Is the CIA Everywhere? Maybe Your Paranoia is Justified

11 Sure-Fire Predictions About the War Against ISIS

Which America Do You Live In: Newsweek's "SuperCountry" or Reich's Stalled "Tinder-Box"?

The Fed's Unprecedented Generosity

How Occupy Wall Street Helped Obama Win

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 people are discussing this page, with 22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Is this a new Obama? Or did he just happen to get ... by Arlen Grossman on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:38:50 AM
And your article is important. The way I see it... by BFalcon on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:24:10 PM
How does this speech differ from all the other swe... by Stephen Unger on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:02:26 AM
Would you marry a man who sweet-talked you and bro... by Bryna Hellmann on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:16:43 AM
I did marry a man like that.  Lived to regret... by Starheart on Friday, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:08:55 PM
Your skepticism is well-founded, Stephen and Bryna... by Arlen Grossman on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:19:54 PM
Your critics aren't "skeptical," which implies the... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:15:31 PM
I do not understand you at all. You are no differe... by Robert Tracey on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:23:20 PM
Brain dead?  evangelicals?   Right, that... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:25:38 PM
It doesn't matter what he feels about those things... by Robert Tracey on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:26:21 PM
even in the vanishingly small chance that the elec... by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:14:35 AM
Paul isn't a libertarian, he's a neo-confederate. ... by Jim Arnold on Friday, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:47:39 AM
What Progressive wants to eliminate the safety net... by Dennis Kaiser on Friday, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:23:32 AM
Obama has shown himself a man of no honor.And he h... by fusion on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:29:01 PM
I guess I won't find any Barack Obama fan club aro... by Arlen Grossman on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:54:10 PM
"At Last, a "New" Presidential Candidate Progressi... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:23:07 PM
Then you can't complain anymore. It's quite sim... by Robert Tracey on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:31:19 PM
The center of U.S. opinion on the issues, not on i... by Not Chomsky on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:19:28 PM
I see where I went wrong, Robert (and others). I p... by Arlen Grossman on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:20:58 PM
Arlen asks:   Why hasn't he spoken like this ... by larry on Thursday, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:16:23 PM
Have you ever had someone sweet-talk you for a sec... by Jim Arnold on Friday, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:01:20 AM
Obama is nothing if not a great orator.  He o... by Starheart on Friday, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:33:22 PM