Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 7 Share on Facebook 9 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 21 (38 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   9 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Assange has Given us a Gift


Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 7   Well Said 6   Valuable 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 12/11/10

Author 57115
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
- Advertisement -
WikiLeaks' release of classified information has generated a lot of attention world-wide in the past few weeks.

The hysterical reaction makes one wonder if this is not an example of killing the messenger for the bad news.

Despite what is claimed, information so far released, though classified, has caused no known harm to any individual, but it has caused plenty of embarrassment to our government. Losing a grip on our empire is not welcomed by the neo-conservatives in charge.

There is now more information confirming that Saudi Arabia is a principle supporter and financier of Al Qaeda and this should set off alarm bells since we guarantee its Sharia-run government.

- Advertisement -
This emphasizes even more the fact that no Al Qaeda existed in Iraq before 9/11, and yet we went to war against Iraq based on the lie that it did.

It has been charged, by self-proclaimed experts, that Julian Assange, the internet publisher of this information, has committed a heinous crime deserving prosecution for treason and execution or even assassination.

But should we not at least ask how the U.S. government can charge an Australian citizen with treason for publishing U.S. secret information, that he did not steal?
- Advertisement -

And if WikiLeaks is to be prosecuted for publishing classified documents, why shouldn't the Washington Post, New York Times, and others that have also published these documents be prosecuted? Actually, some in Congress are threatening this as well.

The New York Times, as a result of a Supreme Court ruling, was not found guilty in 1971 for the publication of the Pentagon Papers. Daniel Ellsberg never served a day in prison for his role in obtaining these secret documents.

The Pentagon Papers were also inserted into the Congressional Record by Senator Mike Gravel with no charges being made of breaking any National Security laws.

Yet the release of this classified information was considered illegal by many, and those who lied us into the Vietnam War and argued for its prolongation were outraged. But the truth gained from the Pentagon Papers revealed that lies were told about the Gulf of Tonkin attack which perpetuated a sad and tragic episode in our history.

Just as with the Vietnam War, the Iraq War was based on lies. We were never threatened by Weapons of Mass Destruction or Al Qaeda in Iraq, though the attack on Iraq was based on this false information.

Any information that challenges the official propaganda for the war in the Middle East is unwelcome by the administration and supporters of these unnecessary wars. Few are interested in understanding the relationship of our foreign policy and our presence in the Middle East to the threat of terrorism. Revealing the real nature and goal for our presence in so many Muslim countries is a threat to our empire and any revelation of this truth is highly resented by those in charge.

Questions to consider:

1. Do the American people deserve to know the truth regarding the ongoing war in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen?

2. Could a larger question be: how can an Army Private gain access to so much secret material?

3. Why is the hostility mostly directed at Assange, the publisher, and not our government's failure to protect classified information?

4. Are we getting our money's worth from the $80 billion per year we spend on our intelligence agencies?

5. Which has resulted in the greatest number of deaths; lying us into war, or WikiLeaks' revelations or the release of the Pentagon Papers?

6. If Assange can be convicted of a crime for publishing information, that he did not steal, what does this say about the future of the First Amendment and the independence of the internet?

7. Could it be that the real reason for the near universal attacks on WikiLeaks is more about secretly maintaining a seriously flawed foreign policy of empire than it is about national security?

8. Is there not a huge difference between releasing secret information to help the enemy in the time of a declared war -" which is treason -" and the releasing of information to expose our government lies that promote secret wars, death, and corruption?

9. Was it not once considered patriotic to stand up to our government when it's wrong?

Thomas Jefferson had it right when he advised: "Let the eyes of vigilance never be closed."

Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas. This text was posted on his Congressional web page Friday, 12/10/10. Link

 

Ron Paul is a member of the House of Representatives from Texas and a former presidential candidate, for the GOP and also for the Libertarian parties. His latest book is End The Fed


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

U.S. Moving Towards War in Syria

How to End the Tragedy in Gaza

The Real Refugee Problem -- And How To Solve It

Ron Paul's farewell address to Congress

War Drums for Syria?

Unconstitutional Uses of Drones Must Stop

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Ron Paul has always fought the good fight, and is ... by Peter Duveen on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 9:00:45 AM
This is an important statement. We shouldn't sho... by Michael Collins on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:11:32 AM
I get the idea you are anemic anarchists. I ag... by David Roche on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 2:23:21 PM
the reason is ... barbaric thievery.And, yes, Libe... by Virginia Simson on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 3:35:30 PM
WikiLeaks, and now OpenLeaks will continue the wor... by David Roche on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:39:32 PM
Rep. Paul has hit the nail squarely on the head ab... by Emily Dale on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:39:06 PM
He finally caught on. Some of us were bitching a ... by David Roche on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:41:17 PM
As soon as Assange is gonna to be Assassinated is ... by John Smith on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:27:08 AM
Dear Ron,I'm still hoping you and Jesse will expos... by Debbie S on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:11:17 PM