Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
July 23, 2008 at 17:10:25

View Ratings | Rate It

Aspartame harms young brains; New Zealand Petition asks for Ban in Schools; New Mexico Physician Stoller Testifies

by Safe Food Campaign, New Zealand (Posted by Stephen Fox)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/SC0807/S00057.html

Press Release, July 23, 2008


Learning and memory may be affected if young people have diet drinks containing the artificial sweetener aspartame, according to a US paediatrician who is presenting evidence today by telelink to the Health Committee at 10am. Mothers are also concerned about New Zealand schools which are now stocking artificially sweetened drinks instead of sugar soft drinks.

The Committee is hearing submissions on aspartame as a result of a petition which calls for the removal of all products containing aspartame and other artificial sweeteners from schools, as well as warning labels on products to alert pregnant women and mothers of young children.

"We are presenting this submission on behalf of over 8,000 people from throughout New Zealand, and especially for all those who have become aware that their symptoms of ill health are due to consuming products with aspartame," stated Alison White, Co-convenor of the Safe Food Campaign.

"The artificial sweetener is the most controversial and complained about additive in history. You only have to google it to see that. It is significant that non-industry funded studies have found various adverse health effects from aspartame, whereas industry-funded studies do not find problems. We cannot underestimate the power and sophistication of industry to maintain and expand its profit and market share, regardless of the health consequences of exposure to this substance."

"The manifestations of aspartame disease in young children are myriad," reported Dr Kenneth Stoller, MD. "These may range from severe headaches, unexplained visual loss, to depression, antisocial behaviour and seizures. Aspartame is not just a food additive. The components in it are isolated in a way that does not occur in nature. It is a neurotoxic drug, causing the deterioration of brain cells."

Mother of a school student, Mary Byrne, is concerned that the Hutt Valley school her daughter attends now stocks artificially sweetened drinks. "I think it's a good thing they're getting rid of sugar soft drinks from schools, but I don't think it's good they're replacing them with artificially sweetened drinks," said Ms Byrne. "I'm pleased that a teacher at the school my daughter is attending is going to show a video on aspartame to students. This gives students more information about the dangers of aspartame, so they are motivated to avoid it."

Aspartame is being used in an increasing number of products, an estimated 6000 products worldwide, not just those labelled 'diet' and 'sugar free' but also in chewing gum, sports drinks, dietary supplements and medications. Sometimes the only warning is 'contains phenylalanine'. An estimated one in 15 people consume aspartame around the world.

"We are alarmed that exposure of young people in New Zealand to aspartame is probably increasing," said Ms White. "Young children especially are at risk of developing an allergy to formaldehyde from aspartame products. Parents and doctors need to be alerted to the problem." The submission presented to the Health Committee includes the stories of three people who have become aware that their health problems were caused by aspartame.

The petition requests specifically:

1. Warning labels on all products containing aspartame to increase awareness of symptoms associated with aspartame toxicity, particularly to alert pregnant women and mothers of small children.

2. A public education programme to raise awareness about adverse reactions to aspartame.

3. A programme to raise awareness within the medical profession of the symptoms associated with aspartame toxicity, to prevent incorrect diagnosis of conditions that may be related to aspartame toxicity.

4. Removal of all products containing aspartame and other artificial sweeteners from schools to reduce toxic effects on young people, thus reducing any behavioural and psychological problems that may result from these effects.

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Book Recommendations for " Aspartame Brain"
Dietary Phenylalanine and Brain Function: Proceedings of the First International Meetings on Dietary Phenylalanine and Brain Function, Washington, D
by Richard J. Wurtman

$87.95
Lowest New Price $20.00

Number of pages: 391
Publisher: Birkhauser

Aspartame - friend, foe or neutral?: An article from: Medical Update
by Edwin W. Brown

$5.95

Number of pages: 2
Publisher: Benjamin Franklin Literary

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments


They Should Ban Aspartame Everywhere!

Aspartame is not a carbohydrate, so the body is just not going to break it down like a sugar, and that is why there are so many problems with it.  We continue to use it because it is very sweet, and you don't have to use nearly as much of it as you would have to use if you were sweetening with sugar...that is why it's considered to be noncaloric.  We have become so fearful of calories, but calories is just a measurement of energy, so if you are not active, don't take in too many calories because that energy will be stored as fat.  I think what they may do in New Zealand is great.  There definitely needs to be an education aspect to it, and they have mentioned that.  I hope the US bans it too!

by mfaison (4 articles, 4 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 23 comments) on Thursday, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:26:34 AM

Recommend  (0+)

MFAISON REPLY

Yes, of course: ban it everywhere. Unfortunately we must be happy with "baby steps," small incremental efforts here and there, as long as we have such pusillanimous regulatory officials in power. What state do you live in? Maybe you could hammer some folks there and get legislation introduced similar to these? Please reply directly to me, if you would: stephen@santafefineart.com. Thanks.

HAWAII RESOLUTION IS HERE:click here

BILL FROM NEW MEXICO:
http://legis.state.nm.us/Sessions/07%20Regular/bills/senate/SB0498.html

by Stephen Fox (96 articles, 3 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 802 comments [33 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Thursday, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:29:02 AM

Recommend  (0+)

The Teddy Bear guy told me:

IN the Teddy Bear Capital of the world or at least Iowa, is a fellow who was addicted to aspartame...he loves the flavor, he told me, and it landed him in a wheelchair.  Why? 

He ended up being so poisoned by the neurotoxic effects of the metabolizing into fromaldyhide, that his nerves gave out and he could no longer walk.  He told me, as we sat in the Museum in this small county seat called Clarion, that his clarion call echoed out to others who have suffered similar symptoms, such as the gulf war syndrome folks who drank pop (as it is called in the midwest) that sat on pallets cooking into formeldihyde in the hot sun.  It turns out that monsanto who started the whole deal tests the pop at 40 degress, but guess what, our bodies run at 13+ degrees hotter than what it takes to incite the formeldihyde and methanol as it is breaking down. 

Check it out.  Then ask yourself, everytime you go into a bank and you see them drinking diet pop whether you want them to be doing that while handling account balances, and then tell them, pilots aren't allowed to drink it while flying because it is a neuro-toxin. 

Well, that's what the Teddy Bear guy told me.  So, when the Aspergers kids wanted a video game club in my classroom at lunch, I told them no diet pop allowed.  One kid brought in a can and when i said no, then he said his Mom makes him drink it, but he secretly dumps out the diet, and puts the regular pop in the diet can so she doesn't know.  And shockjock savage is probably drinking the aspartame...now who's stupid.......

by karmacounselor (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 106 comments [7 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:04:56 AM

Recommend  (0+)

reply to comment

It is pathetic, isn't it, how well meaning parents and teachers have sometimes been so tragically misled by corporate propaganda, lies on television, advertisements, etc., on the "safeness" of horrible poisons like Aspartame.

You are in Iowa. You could do a world of good by sending the text of the Hawaii Senate Resolution 191 which I wrote for 2008 legislature in Honolulu, with Hawaii taken out, and Iowa substituted in, to your state legislators, whom you would be asking to sponsor a similar resolution in 2009 in Des Moines. Here is the text, and just getting one Senator and/or one State Rep. to sponsor it is a major accomplishment, since it published on the Iowa Legislature website, and then the corporations and lobbyists begin to sweat bullets and go into high gear with their lies and manipulations:

SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 191, sponsored by Senator Suzanne Chun Oakland of Honolulu, unfortunately killed by Senate Health Committee inaction, Chairman, Senator David Ige of Pearl City, Hawaii

[ I am not implying that Ige is a corporate crook; perhaps inept and certainly manipulated by one other powerful Hawaii Senator, a former lobbyist]:

 

REQUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES TO REVIEW EXISTING REPORTS AND STUDIES RELATED TO ASPARTAME, AND REQUESTING THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION TO RESCIND APPROVAL OF ASPARTAME FOR UNITED STATES MARKETS.

WHEREAS, aspartame was originally developed as a drug to treat peptic ulcers; and

WHEREAS, manufacturers state that aspartame is made up of forty per cent aspartic acid, fifty per cent phenylalanine, and ten per cent methanol; and

WHEREAS, aspartic acid is a nonessential amino acid that is used by the body to initiate apoptosis or cell death in aging cells, and that excess aspartic acid from aspartame consumption causes apoptosis in healthy cells that can destroy healthy tissue, especially in the brain; and

WHEREAS, phenylalanine is an essential amino acid found naturally in protein but when isolated becomes neurotoxic, lowers the seizure threshold, depletes serotonin triggering psychiatric and behavioral problems, and interacts with antidepressants and other drugs; and

WHEREAS, methanol is a severe metabolic poison classified as a narcotic that converts to formaldehyde and formic acid, and can embalm living tissue and damage DNA; and

WHEREAS, aspartame metabolites include formaldehyde, a "class A" carcinogen, diketopiperazine, a brain tumor agent, and formic acid; and

WHEREAS, in 1974, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved aspartame as an artificial sweetener, but asked its manufacturer Searle to hold back from selling it on the market until further tests could be made with regards to its safety; and

 WHEREAS, scientific data revealed that there was a problem with aspartame safety data and the United States Food and Drug Administration withdrew its approval; and

WHEREAS, in 1975, the United States Food and Drug Administration initiated an investigation into Searle's laboratory practices and discovered fraud in scientific experiments as well as manipulated data giving favorable results proving aspartame to be safe; and

WHEREAS, the results of this investigation are included in what is called "The Bressler Report" by Jerome Bressler; and

WHEREAS, in 1980, Dr. John Olney submitted scientific data to a United States Food and Drug Administration Public Board of Inquiry showing that aspartic acid, the excitotoxic ingredient in aspartame, caused holes in the brains of mice; and

WHEREAS, Dr. John Olney stated that it warranted special emphasis that excitotoxins act by an acute but silent mechanism requiring only a single exposure to toxic concentrations for CVO neurons to be quietly destroyed, that clearly Searle failed to establish the safety of their product, aspartame, for use in children's food, and that all age comparative data support the following conclusions: (1) orally administered excitotoxins destroy CVO neurons at any age; (2) immature animals are most vulnerable; and (3) the toxic threshold increases only gradually between birth and adulthood; and

WHEREAS, in 1980, the Public Board of Inquiry unanimously voted against aspartame approval, but was overruled by a new United States Food and Drug Administration Commissioner, Dr. Arthur Hull Hays, against the advice of Food and Drug Administration scientific personnel and advisers; and

WHEREAS, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved aspartame use in sodas, despite the fact that the National Soft Drink Association argued vehemently against aspartame in these quotes from their protest:

(1)  "The present record does not contain data which demonstrate that the use of APM in soft drinks will not result in the adulteration of the beverages under section 402(a)(3) of the FDC Act 21 U.S.C. 342(a)(3), which provides that a food is adulterated if it contains, in whole or in part, "a decomposed substance or if it is otherwise unfit for food”;

(2)  "An important decomposition product of aspartame, aspartic acid, cannot be detected at all using TLC";

(3)  "G. D. Searle and Company has not demonstrated to a reasonable certainty that the use of aspartame in soft drinks, without quantitative limitations, will not adversely affect human health as a result of the changes such use is likely to cause in brain chemistry and under certain reasonably anticipated conditions of use"; and

(4)  "Specifically, Searle has not met its burdens under section 409....to demonstrate that aspartame is safe and functional for use in soft drinks.  Collectively, the extensive deficiencies in the stability studies conducted by Searle to demonstrate that aspartame and its degradation products are safe in soft drinks intended to be sold in the United States, render those studies inadequate and unreliable."  Senate Congressional Record, May 7, 1985, S5507–5511; and

WHEREAS, the United States Food and Drug Administration has compiled a list of ninety-two symptoms attributed to aspartame consumption including four types of seizures, coma, and death; and

WHEREAS, the Ramazzini Studies by the European Foundation for Oncology in Italy conducted exhaustive studies over three years with thousands of rats, and proved aspartame to be a multipotential carcinogen, thus confirming the United States Food and Drug Administration's original findings; and

WHEREAS, the United States Food and Drug Administration admitted that aspartame caused cancer over two decades ago when the Administration's toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, told Congress at least one of Searle's studies "has established beyond any reasonable doubt that aspartame is capable of inducing brain tumors in experimental animals and that this predisposition of it is of extremely high significance....In view of these indications that the cancer causing potential of aspartame is a matter that had been established way beyond any reasonable doubt, one can ask: What is the reason for the apparent refusal by the FDA to invoke for this food additive the so-called Delaney Amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act? Given the cancer causing potential of aspartame how would the FDA justify its position that it views a certain amount of aspartame as constituting an allowable daily intake or 'safe' level of it? Is that position in effect not equivalent to setting a 'tolerance' for this food additive and thus a violation of that law?  And if the FDA itself elects to violate the law, who is left to protect the health of the public?" Congressional Record, August 1, l985, SID835:131; and

WHEREAS, aspartame is linked to sudden death, multiple sclerosis, lupus, and many neurodegenerative diseases, as cited in many medical texts, most notably:  Aspartame Disease:  An Ignored Epidemic, by H.J. Roberts, M.D., and Excitotoxins:  The Taste That Kills, by Russell Blaylock, M.D.; and

WHEREAS, on November 3, 1987, Dr. Louis Elsas told Congress:  "I am a pediatrician, a Professor of Pediatrics at Emory and have spent twenty-five years in the biomedical sciences, trying to prevent mental retardation and birth defect caused by excess phenylalanine, and therein lies my basic concern, that aspartame is in fact a well known neurotoxin and teratogen which, in some as yet undefined dose, will. . . irreversibly in the developing child or fetal brain, produce adverse effects"; and

WHEREAS, there are tens of thousands of case histories and anecdotal accounts from victims of aspartame poisoning who have come forward to make their case histories known; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED by the Senate of the Twenty-fourth Legislature of the State of Hawaii, Regular Session of 2008, the House of Representatives concurring, that the Department of Health is requested to create, within their existing budget, an evidentiary repository accessible to the public for patients and physicians to submit over the next year their cases involving victims of aspartame poisoning; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Health is requested to report to the Legislature on the status of the evidentiary repository during periodic interim meetings with the Chairs of the Hawaii State Senate Committees on Health and Human Services and Public Housing, the House of Representatives Committees on Health and Human Services and Housing, and the state Attorney General; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Department of Health is requested to review all existing reports, studies, experiments, and related literature on aspartame, including clinical studies, differentiating each study by its funding source, and submit a report to the Legislature no later than twenty days prior to the convening of the 2009 Regular Session; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the National Academy of Sciences is requested to review all existing reports, studies, experiments, and related literature on aspartame, including clinical studies, differentiating each study by its funding source, and that, if funding is required to undertake this extended evaluation, that the appropriate funding be sought from various foundations and from Congress; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that given the enormous amount of evidence that has been compiled concerning the neurodegenerative harm it can cause, that the United States Food and Drug Administration is requested to rescind approval of aspartame immediately on a phase‑out basis over six months to one year; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certified copies of this Concurrent Resolution be transmitted to the members of Hawaii's Congressional Delegation, the Commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration, the Executive Director of the National Academy of Sciences, the Director of Health, the Director of Human Services, the Attorney General, and the Director of Commerce and Consumer Affairs.

by Stephen Fox (96 articles, 3 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 802 comments [33 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Monday, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:56:30 AM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Tampa, FL - UnitedHealth to Enter Funeral Parlor Industry by James Dunham

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

Did Obama Appoint People With Track Record of Making Right Decisions? by Ralph Nader

The true face of politics as 467,000 jobs were shed by Mary MacElveen

Obama Has No Legal Authority For Afghan War by Sherwood Ross

Torture on the 4th of July by Lawrence Gist

Hypocritical Repugnicans Owe WJ Clinton an Apology by David Gray

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum