Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

An unsent letter to the President's chief counterterrorism advisor

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
- Advertisement -

Prologue

Medea Benjamin, a truly patriotic American and co-founder of the anti-war group, Code Pink, recently wrote an article in OpEdNews.com (May 1, 2012) explaining why she had interrupted the speech entitled "The Ethics and Efficacy of the President's Counterterrorism Strategy" being given by John Brennan, President Obama's chief counterterrorism adviser at the Woodrow Wilson International Center on April 30.

Her action protesting the administration's use of drone strikes was very courageous. I also really appreciate her having written the article. Had she not done so the speech probably would have escaped my attention. After reading her article I found and read the transcript of Mr. Brennan's speech, which instantly reminded me of Hannah Arendt's phrase, "the banality of evil" that she coined to characterize the thoughtless mind of Adolph Eichmann, whose trial she was reporting on for The New Yorker.

My next reaction was to write what now follows as my unsent letter to the chief counter terrorism advisor. A sent letter would be round filed by his staff before he ever saw it.

 

The unsent letter

Dear Chief Counterterrorism advisor to the President,

I recently read an account by the woman who interrupted the speech you gave on April 30 at the Woodrow Wilson International Center. I then read a transcript of your speech. I was appalled by the ouster of the lady and by your speech. I now put to you a series of questions about the entire matter.

- Advertisement -

On the ouster of the protestor

According to the protestor's own account, after her having made only a few remarks she "was handcuffed and taken to the basement of the building, where [she] was questioned about [her] background and motives---[and eventually] released." Apparently she was not making any threatening gestures or speaking profanely and was simply countering your remarks based on what she knew to be to be factual reporting of the deadly effects of U.S. drone attacks on foreign civilians.

Q1. Why did you not intercede and ask your host to give the protestor a little more time to finish her remarks and questions and to give you a little time for a rejoinder?   

Q2. By not altering your speech to respond to her remarks were you in effect acknowledging that your speech was intended to be propaganda for the administration's use of drone strikes and not a basis for debate?

 

- Advertisement -

On defining terrorism

Q3. I find no actual definition of terrorism in your speech. Title 22, Chapter 38 of the United States Codes defines "terrorism" as "premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents." Would you agree that by that definition, the U.S. is a clandestine agent?

Q4. Since by definition a terrorist is a person who perpetrates such violence, and since not all of the targeted individuals were involved in the attack on the twin towers, how can targeted individuals not involved be terrorists if they have not actually perpetrated violence in some other way against Americans, and what is the administration's rationale for killing individuals thought to "pose" a threat of violence from afar to the United States?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

I am a retired (1995)organizational psychologist who has since concentrated on the subjects of the collusion between government and corporations and matters of war and peace. I have just finished writing my final book (final because I am staring (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

America's Corpocracy: The Legacy of U.S. Supreme Court Justice, Lewis F. Powell (1907-1998)

Robed Injustice

America needs a socially responsible capitalism

Tyranny's Hush Money

The Militarization of American Education

Stop Warfare, Not Medicare: A Pathetic Personal Experience but Still Undaunted

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Any conscientious, truly patriotic American who ... by Gary Brumback on Thursday, May 17, 2012 at 3:32:17 AM
I doubt that our illustrious president or anyone i... by Ginger McClemons on Friday, May 18, 2012 at 8:23:59 AM
Thank you very much Ginger for your nice complimen... by Gary Brumback on Friday, May 18, 2012 at 9:10:06 AM