OpEdNews Op Eds

An Appeal to Gen. Dempsey on Syria

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Must Read 2   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 8/30/13

- Advertisement -
Original published at Consortium News


Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

MEMORANDUM FOR: General Martin Dempsey, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff

FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity

SUBJECT: Syria and Our Oath to Defend the Constitution

Dear Gen. Dempsey:

Summary:  We refer to your acknowledgment, in your letter of July 19 to Sen. Carl Levin on Syria, that a "decision to use force is not one that any of us takes lightly. It is no less than an act of war." It appears that the President may order such an act of war without proper Congressional authorization. 

As seasoned intelligence and military professionals solemnly sworn to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, we have long been aware that -- from private to general -- it is one's duty not to obey an illegal order. If such were given, the honorable thing would be to resign, rather than be complicit.

The options your letter addressed regarding potential use of military force included five being considered at the time:

- Advertisement -

(1) Train, Advise, Assist the Opposition;

(2) Conduct Limited Stand-off Strikes;

(3) Establish a No-Fly Zone;

(4) Establish Buffer Zones;

(5) Control Chemical Weapons.

You were quite candid about the risks and costs attached to each of the five options, and stressed the difficulty of staying out of the Syrian civil war, once the U.S. launched military action. In responding to questions on military options voiced at your re-nomination hearing on July 18, your letter to the chair of the Committee on Armed Services reflects that you acknowledge Congress's Constitutional role with respect to U.S. "acts of war." Equally important, you addressed these words to Sen. Levin: "You deserve my best military advice on how military force could be used in order to decide whether it should be used." (emphasis in your letter).

- Advertisement -

"Tailored, Limited" Strike Option

Presumably, there has not been enough time to give Sen. Levin's committee an equivalent assessment of the implications of the new option described by the President Wednesday evening as a "tailored, limited" response to the chemical weapons attack on August 21 that he has been told was carried out by Syrian government forces. President Obama said, without elaboration, that a retaliatory strike is "needed ... to protect U.S. security."

It is precisely this kind of unsupported claim (so embarrassingly reminiscent of the spurious ones used more than a decade ago to "justify" attacks on Iraq) that needs to be subjected to rigorous analysis by both the Pentagon and Congress BEFORE the President orders military action. For some unexplained reason of urgency, that order may come within the next day or two. With no wish to prejudge the results of analysis presumably under way, we feel it our responsibility to tell you now that, speaking out of several hundred years of collective experience in intelligence and national security matters, we strongly believe that the President's reference to a military strike on Syria being "needed to protect U.S. security" cannot bear close scrutiny.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

http://

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity  ( VIPS ) is a group of current and former officials of the  United States Intelligence Community , including some from the  Central Intelligence Agency  (CIA), the  U.S. State Department 's  Intelligence Bureau  (INR), and the  Defense Intelligence Agency  (DIA). It was formed in January 2003 as a "coast-to-coast enterprise" to protest the use of faulty intelligence "upon which the US/UK invasion of Iraq was based." [1][2][3]  The group issued a letter before the  2003 invasion of Iraq stating that intelligence analysts were not being listened to by policy makers. In August 2010 it issued a memorandum to the White House warning of an imminent Israeli attack on Iran.
More at wikipedia

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

With a serious straight face Powell tells the trut... by Lance Ciepiela on Friday, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:18:39 PM
Also demonstrates that Mssrs. Bush and Obama had n... by Paul Repstock on Friday, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:00:30 PM
to be completely without conscience with regard to... by Kim Cassidy on Saturday, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:10:41 PM