Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   6 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

American Culture and the Psychology of Mass Shootings

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Interesting 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 1/18/13

How are we to understand the psychology of the gun violence that afflicts American society?

Peter Michaelson goes to great lengths to describe the aberrant psychology of an individual who would slaughter innocent strangers, in an article recently published by Buzzflash on the "The Psychology Behind Mass Shootings" [click here

What mainstream psychology ignores about mass murderers:

While such an analysis can provide important insights and is a necessary contribution to reducing such violence, it is at the same time extremely one-sided and unfortunately displays a bias that is typical of mainstream psychology. This is particularly evident when Michaelson writes, "our suffering is produced through inner conflict --we have nowhere to turn for relief but inward."

Imagine telling a child who is being sexually abused by his caregiver that his suffering is simply a result of inner conflict. Or explaining to victims of superstorm Sandy who are being denied aid by squabbling Republicans that they will just have to seek inner relief. Then try to convince African-Americans that the bigotry they have experienced the last 200 years is strictly a result of and must be addressed on the level of their individual psychology.

While it is true that, as Michaelson wrote, "We have to learn that our negative impressions, impulses, and emotions are not  caused exclusively by external factors, even when life is difficult and seems unfair" so that we will learn to "stop projecting on to others," it also is true that external factors have a profound influence on our inner psychology. Michelson's bias leads him to pathologize rampage shooters at length, but apart from a few remarks about gun control he says next to nothing about our society that glorifies, propagates and turns a blind eye to violence.

In an interview, psychologist James Hillman remarked:

I am attacking the theories of psychotherapy. . . . It makes every problem a subjective, inner problem. And that's not where the problems come from. They come from the environment, the cities, the economy, the racism. They come from architecture, school systems, capitalism, exploitation. They come from many places that psychotherapy does not address. Psychotherapy theory turns it all on you: you are the one who is wrong. What I'm trying to say is that, if a kid is having trouble or is discouraged, the problem is not just inside the kid; it's also in the system, the society.   

Newtown shows us - ourselves:

The murdered children at Newtown hold up a mirror to our collective psyche. In that mirror we see President Obama killing innocent children with drone strikes, the mainstream media remaining virtually silent about this policy, and Obama's counterterrorism advisor Bruce Reidel likening such killings to mowing the lawn: "You've got to mow the lawn all the time. The minute you stop mowing, the grass is going to grow back."

All of this is but a part of our demented policy of perpetual war, aided and abetted by both political parties as the latest amplification of the military-industrial complex's iron grip on our society. Violence and murder is our business, and the tone-deaf National Rifle Association wants to make sure that anyone within our borders who has the urge to murder has the means to do so as effectively as possible.

These are but a few of the countless examples of the violence rampant in our society. Michaelson's analysis does us a disservice by overemphasizing the individual psychology of mass killers and virtually ignoring the society that models such behavior and arms its citizens. As a collective , with our $525 billion yearly military budget, we clearly are displaying the "murderous instincts," "profound inner weakness" and "lack of self-regulation" that Michaelson pins solely on individual shooters.

When an individual kills innocent civilians, we call it murder and insanity, and anyone foolhardy enough to defend such behavior would be rightly vilified. In contrast, when our government routinely kills innocent civilians, we either deny it is happening or liken it to "mowing the grass," and anyone who defends such behavior calls themselves a patriot.

Certainly it is important to recognize that the Newtown killer was mentally disturbed. The deeper healing will come, however, when we admit that in many ways he is a reflection of our own profoundly dysfunctional society -- and then decide to do something about it.

Alan James Strachan, Ph.D. is a psychotherapist, teacher and author of the book-in-progress, America on the Couch: Dreams and Nightmares of Democracy , http://www.americaonthecouch.net .

 

www.americaonthecouch.net

Alan James Strachan, Ph.D. is a psychotherapist, author and teacher, and Janet Coster, M.A., M.A., is a transpersonal counselor, spiritual director and workshop leader. This article is adapted from their book-in-progress, America on the Couch: (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

American Culture and the Psychology of Mass Shootings

MCCAIN TELLS THE TRUTH ABOUT SARAH PALIN, BUT DID ANYBODY NOTICE?

Star Trek and the NSA

Occupying Democracy: A Moral Revolution for Social Justice

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Your essay is absolutely fantastic... by Alan James Strachan on Friday, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:00:32 AM
Someone has the testicular fortitude to call it li... by Sister Begonia on Friday, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:20:49 PM
Hi Sister Begonia, Thank you for your encouraging... by Alan James Strachan on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:07:34 AM
Thank you for your clear, succinct and much fuller... by Janet Coster on Friday, Jan 18, 2013 at 6:06:24 PM
Mr. Michaelson writes pop psychology. His would be... by Ned Lud on Friday, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:42:35 PM
Hi Ned,   Thank you for r... by Alan James Strachan on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 8:11:24 AM