Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 8/4/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (12 comments)

America's Greatest Problem; The Misunderstanding of Exponential Growth:

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Exponential growth (or geometric growth) is growth by a fixed rate, such as 5% per year. This is opposed to linear growth which is growth by a fixed number. For example, if a family consumes a loaf of bread every week, they would consume 52 loaves of bread per year, year in and year out. While over time, the consumption of the family would grow linearly, or on a cumulative basis, their annual consumption would remain constant.

The first year our family would consume 52 loaves, the second year 52 loaves, for a cumulative total of 104 loaves and then 156 in the third year and so on. This is much different than the U.S. economic system of exponential growth, which grows geometrically or in proportion to it current size.

Should we have applied exponential growth to our loaves of bread and factored a growth rate of just 4% per year, after 17.5 years the family would be using 2 loaves of bread per day. In another 17.5 years, 4 loaves of bread per day and so on to a point that over a given period of time there would not be enough bread in the world to fill the demand.

After reading the above example, how many of you thought, “Seventeen and half years is a long time to double?” It is my belief that the total and complete disconnect from time is the culprit that allows us to base our economy on an impossible mathematical foundation; that of exponential growth. Any exponential growth calculation, when applied to a tangible resource in a finite environment, is a model only valid for a temporary period of time.

The other possibility for our mystifying acceptance of the impossibility of exponential growth (other than misunderstanding the element of time), would be that we view the time that the growth scheme will wor k as being sufficient to last through our personal life span.

Could it be that as a whole, we simply don’t care what happens to those who will come after us? And that we justify our greed and inaction under the thin veil of “they” will find a way? I’ll leave that for you to decide.

Our system of economics in the U.S. is in fact based on exponential growth. Every politician from small town mayor to the president of the United States promises growth. Not linear growth, but exponential growth.

When our government bean counters say that the economy is growing by 4% annually, they are referring to 4% of the current economy. Or, that our overall economy is now 104% of what is was last year. This promised growth will continue only until such time that it reaches an impenetrable barrier such as 100% depletion of a given critical resource, for instance…oil. Or, the inability of resources such as farm land to produce sufficient food for the exponentially growing population of the world.

We won’t slowly run out of resources; we will suddenly run out of resources. Technology has allowed us to harvest and consume resources in an exponential manner to keep pace with our exponential growth. Technology may well continue to advance, however, the resources that technology is applied to will continue to decline. You can write that on the wall.

As an example, modern underground coal miners by using the “advancing long wall system” can mine more coal in one shift, than the same number of old time miners could mine in one year! We are apparently in a hurry to reach the end. Once more, pack light, it’s gonna be a short trip.

Our system of “compounding debt capitalism” by its very design, insures both constant inflation of the money supply, constant population growth and exponential consumption of finite resources; all of which are mathematically and physically impossible in a finite world. And that is a very bad thing for those whose future is based on “The Biggest Lie Ever Believed,” the lie that “exponential growth is good.”

If you find that you’re on the wrong train, get off at the next stop. It makes getting back home a much shorter trip. ─ Mike Folkerth

 

www.kingofsimple.com

Mike Folkerth is the author of "The Biggest Lie Ever Believed" and is not your run-of-the-mill author of finance and economics. The former real estate broker, developer, private real estate fund manager, auctioneer, Alaskan bush pilot, (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Who said that? by Gregg Gordon on Monday, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:31:55 AM
I'll add this by Mike Folkerth on Monday, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:33:30 AM
Gregg by Mike Folkerth on Monday, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:25:55 AM
choose while you can, lest you not have one by mikel paul on Monday, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:11:40 PM
Unlimited growth leads to very limited extinction. by Robert N Smith on Monday, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:34:14 PM
The understanding of by Mike Folkerth on Monday, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:31:23 PM
Well by pft on Monday, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:40:25 PM
Real problem with nuclear energy by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Aug 5, 2008 at 7:09:36 AM
Nick by Mike Folkerth on Tuesday, Aug 5, 2008 at 7:39:21 AM
PFT by Mike Folkerth on Tuesday, Aug 5, 2008 at 7:56:02 AM
Misunderstanding of Exponent by Bryan Emmel on Wednesday, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:03:04 AM
Bryan by Mike Folkerth on Wednesday, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:22:39 AM