Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   5 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

America Demands Corruption in a President

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Must Read 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (64 fans)

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/86530412@N02/8449175260/: The Pay Off
The Pay Off
(image by StockMonkeys.com)


Perhaps Americans think that unless a politician is corrupt, the politician won't be able to get anything done -- he or she will be "weak" unless corrupt. That view, which seems to be reflected in casual acceptance of corrupt politicians such as of all Republicans (beholden to the super-rich), and also of conservative Democrats such as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (beholden to the super-rich while speaking as "liberals"), is a rejection of democracy, because democracy cannot even function at all if it's corrupt; only the corruptors then rule, and that's not democracy; there's another name for that; it's called kleptocracy, or fascism, or a number of other terms, but they all refer to dictatorship, by the corruptors, who buy the officials -- and no dictatorship is, or even can be, democratic.

After Jonathan Chait headlined in New York Magazine on 23 September last year,  "How to Beat Hillary Clinton,"  there was a brief flurry of punditry responding to Chait's view that Hillary's record is too corrupt for her to be able to beat Elizabeth Warren in Democratic Presidential primaries. The preponderant view expressed by commentators was that Chait was wrong and Hillary is inevitable to win the Democratic Presidential nomination in 2016 (if she wants the Presidency, which she obviously does). The blogger "Steve M" at "No More Mister Nice" bannered the very same day as Chait,  "No, Hillary Clinton Is Not Going to Lose in 2016 Because of a Sudden Populist Anti-Corruption Surge,"  and he cited example after example to show that,"Voters don't get angry about cronyism, because they expect no less; they don't get angry about financiers' shady doings, because no ambitious politician dares to talk about them, for fear of drying up the revue stream ... Yes, maybe there's one exception to that rule:  Elizabeth Warren . But she's become all but invisible to the average American since she won her election."

Since that time, last September, has Hillary's poll-standing gone down, or Warren's gone up? Not at all: neither has happened.

This has been so even during the past few months while Hillary Clinton has been visiting with Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street firms to pick up $200,000 a shot for meeting with them and for discussing with them in private whatever questions they ask her while they size her up for how much money they will donate to her campaign.

Maybe Americans just don't know  how corrupt Hillary is ; or else maybe it's just that they don't care about corruption; but, either way, Americans seem willing to throw democracy out the window and to live in a corrupt society: a dictatorship by big money, instead of a democracy. 

----------

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They're Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of  CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.

 

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They're Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010,  and of  CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

First Examination of Malaysian MH-17 Cockpit Photo Shows Ukraine Government Shot that Plane Down

Indications that the U.S. Is Planning a Nuclear Attack Against Russia

Harry Reid Effectively Kills Obama's TPP and TTIP International Trade Deals

The Propaganda War About Ukraine: How Important It Really Is

Elizabeth Warren Comes Down Hard Against Global Warming, Separates Herself From Hillary Clinton on Climate Change

How Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Congressional Republicans, Created Child-Refugee Flood

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

U.S. voters have no clue how deep Hillary's "Repub... by Mort Persky on Friday, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:47:53 AM
This essay makes a simple yet potent argument: th... by Robert S. Becker on Friday, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:50:42 PM
Yu have expressed perfectly my own view here of ev... by Eric Zuesse on Friday, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:22:51 PM
Actually, Eric's a good, known quantity here. So a... by J. Edward Tremlett on Friday, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:47:55 PM
Please don't make jokes. This goes so far beyond... by Paul Repstock on Friday, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:12:08 PM